<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 115 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62128</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal despite a delay in filing due to postal issues. The addition of Rs. 3,000 to the assessee&#039;s income under Section 40A(3) was upheld as the cash payment lacked evidence of exceptional circumstances. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the application of Rule 6DD(j) for cash payments, deleting the addition based on exceptional circumstances of borrowing funds after banking hours.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 115 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62128</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal despite a delay in filing due to postal issues. The addition of Rs. 3,000 to the assessee&#039;s income under Section 40A(3) was upheld as the cash payment lacked evidence of exceptional circumstances. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the application of Rule 6DD(j) for cash payments, deleting the addition based on exceptional circumstances of borrowing funds after banking hours.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>