<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 29 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding no basis for penalty imposition for the assessment year 1969-70. The assessee&#039;s cooperation post-settlement proposal showed transparency, with discrepancies attributed to estimation variances, not deliberate concealment. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for substantial evidence to support penalties and dismissed the idea that an agreement alone could prove concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:52:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 29 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding no basis for penalty imposition for the assessment year 1969-70. The assessee&#039;s cooperation post-settlement proposal showed transparency, with discrepancies attributed to estimation variances, not deliberate concealment. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for substantial evidence to support penalties and dismissed the idea that an agreement alone could prove concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>