<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62046</link>
    <description>In a block assessment against an &quot;other person&quot; under the search provisions, limitation was held to run from the notice issued to that person, so the assessment was not time-barred. A challenge based on absence of a hearing before the Commissioner&#039;s approval also failed, as audi alteram partem was not extended beyond the statute. However, additions founded on third-party statements and search material could not stand without disclosure of the relied-upon material and a fair opportunity to rebut it. The assessment was therefore set aside for fresh adjudication after supplying the material and allowing cross-examination where the statements were used.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:19:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62046</link>
      <description>In a block assessment against an &quot;other person&quot; under the search provisions, limitation was held to run from the notice issued to that person, so the assessment was not time-barred. A challenge based on absence of a hearing before the Commissioner&#039;s approval also failed, as audi alteram partem was not extended beyond the statute. However, additions founded on third-party statements and search material could not stand without disclosure of the relied-upon material and a fair opportunity to rebut it. The assessment was therefore set aside for fresh adjudication after supplying the material and allowing cross-examination where the statements were used.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>