<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 265 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overruled the preliminary objection regarding the locus standi of the appellants, holding that they were competent to file the appeal as affected parties under the broad definition of &#039;assessee&#039; in the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed, ensuring that the right to appeal should not be denied on technicalities. The case was directed to be heard on 8-1-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 265 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overruled the preliminary objection regarding the locus standi of the appellants, holding that they were competent to file the appeal as affected parties under the broad definition of &#039;assessee&#039; in the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed, ensuring that the right to appeal should not be denied on technicalities. The case was directed to be heard on 8-1-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>