<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 254 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62016</link>
    <description>Government securities held by a banking company under statutory liquidity requirements may be treated as stock-in-trade on the facts, because the banking scheme permits purchase and sale and the accounting label of &quot;investment&quot; is not conclusive; valuation at market value where lower than cost was therefore allowable, and the depreciation claim succeeded. Reassessment initiated beyond four years under section 147 was not sustainable where it rested on a later legal view and no failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts was shown, so the reopening lacked jurisdiction and was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:46:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 254 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62016</link>
      <description>Government securities held by a banking company under statutory liquidity requirements may be treated as stock-in-trade on the facts, because the banking scheme permits purchase and sale and the accounting label of &quot;investment&quot; is not conclusive; valuation at market value where lower than cost was therefore allowable, and the depreciation claim succeeded. Reassessment initiated beyond four years under section 147 was not sustainable where it rested on a later legal view and no failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts was shown, so the reopening lacked jurisdiction and was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>