<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 112 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62010</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment was not valid under either section 147(a) or section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of full and truthful disclosure of material facts by the assessee and established that an audit report&#039;s opinion alone does not constitute valid grounds for reopening assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 112 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62010</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment was not valid under either section 147(a) or section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of full and truthful disclosure of material facts by the assessee and established that an audit report&#039;s opinion alone does not constitute valid grounds for reopening assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>