<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 314 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-company, determining that it did not qualify as an &quot;investment company&quot; or a &quot;credit institution&quot; under the Interest-tax Act. The company&#039;s activities focused on managing state-owned industrial enterprises and acting as a holding company for the Kerala Government. As it operated solely as an agent of the government, disbursing funds to subsidiary companies without retaining interest collected, the Tribunal concluded that the company was not liable for interest tax. The decision was supported by the precedent set in the case of CIT v. South Indian Bank Ltd., leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 314 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-company, determining that it did not qualify as an &quot;investment company&quot; or a &quot;credit institution&quot; under the Interest-tax Act. The company&#039;s activities focused on managing state-owned industrial enterprises and acting as a holding company for the Kerala Government. As it operated solely as an agent of the government, disbursing funds to subsidiary companies without retaining interest collected, the Tribunal concluded that the company was not liable for interest tax. The decision was supported by the precedent set in the case of CIT v. South Indian Bank Ltd., leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=62005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>