<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 105 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the appeal and cross-objection, affirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decisions. The loan taken by the assessee was not considered deemed dividend as the assessee did not have substantial interest in the company until shares were registered in the names of minors. The genuineness of the gift of shares to the assessee&#039;s daughter&#039;s minor children was upheld, and the interest disallowance of Rs. 7,909 was sustained due to lack of evidence on the utilization of borrowings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 105 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the appeal and cross-objection, affirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decisions. The loan taken by the assessee was not considered deemed dividend as the assessee did not have substantial interest in the company until shares were registered in the names of minors. The genuineness of the gift of shares to the assessee&#039;s daughter&#039;s minor children was upheld, and the interest disallowance of Rs. 7,909 was sustained due to lack of evidence on the utilization of borrowings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>