<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 165 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the partners, canceling the gift tax assessments imposed on them individually. It held that the admission of a minor partner was an act of the firm, not individual partners, and that only the firm should be liable for gift tax as all partners suffered a detriment due to the admission of the minor. The Tribunal emphasized that partners who did not suffer any detriment could not be considered donors for gift tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 165 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the partners, canceling the gift tax assessments imposed on them individually. It held that the admission of a minor partner was an act of the firm, not individual partners, and that only the firm should be liable for gift tax as all partners suffered a detriment due to the admission of the minor. The Tribunal emphasized that partners who did not suffer any detriment could not be considered donors for gift tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>