<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 93 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by the assessee as not maintainable, ruling that the assessee lacked standing to appeal since the order of the CIT (Appeals) fully favored them. The Tribunal clarified that only aggrieved parties have the right to appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the time limit under Section 153(2A) did not apply in this case, as the order issued on 8-3-1994 was not a fresh assessment but a compliance order following the appellate decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 93 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal filed by the assessee as not maintainable, ruling that the assessee lacked standing to appeal since the order of the CIT (Appeals) fully favored them. The Tribunal clarified that only aggrieved parties have the right to appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the time limit under Section 153(2A) did not apply in this case, as the order issued on 8-3-1994 was not a fresh assessment but a compliance order following the appellate decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>