<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 196 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion, allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, canceling the penalty levied by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified as it did not emanate from the satisfaction of the ITO and the explanation provided by the assessee was bona fide, thus not attracting the provisions of Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 196 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority opinion, allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, canceling the penalty levied by the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified as it did not emanate from the satisfaction of the ITO and the explanation provided by the assessee was bona fide, thus not attracting the provisions of Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>