<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 119 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed a deduction claim for a shortage in stores and raw materials for a company, determining the shortage as an accumulated business loss over several years rather than a capital loss. The Tribunal acknowledged the company&#039;s awareness of the shortages since 1980 and allowed a partial deduction of Rs. 10 lakhs for the assessment year 1986-87, rejecting the Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals)&#039;s arguments. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 119 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed a deduction claim for a shortage in stores and raw materials for a company, determining the shortage as an accumulated business loss over several years rather than a capital loss. The Tribunal acknowledged the company&#039;s awareness of the shortages since 1980 and allowed a partial deduction of Rs. 10 lakhs for the assessment year 1986-87, rejecting the Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals)&#039;s arguments. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>