<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 123 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT (Appeals) and cancelling the levy of additional tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the rectification of a non-existent intimation was beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, and the retrospective amendment to Section 143(1A) could not be applied to justify the rectification order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 123 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the CIT (Appeals) and cancelling the levy of additional tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the rectification of a non-existent intimation was beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, and the retrospective amendment to Section 143(1A) could not be applied to justify the rectification order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>