<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 138 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty under section 273(2)(aa) was without jurisdiction due to the lack of proper satisfaction regarding the nature of the offense during the assessment proceedings. The appeals were allowed, and the penalty orders were quashed. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case for the levy of penalty under section 273(2)(aa).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 138 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty under section 273(2)(aa) was without jurisdiction due to the lack of proper satisfaction regarding the nature of the offense during the assessment proceedings. The appeals were allowed, and the penalty orders were quashed. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case for the levy of penalty under section 273(2)(aa).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>