<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 55 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61826</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) were invalid and bad in law. Consequently, the reassessment was cancelled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The tribunal did not delve into the merits of the disallowances made by the assessing authority as the reassessment itself was held to be invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 55 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61826</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) were invalid and bad in law. Consequently, the reassessment was cancelled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The tribunal did not delve into the merits of the disallowances made by the assessing authority as the reassessment itself was held to be invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>