<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 129 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The decision was based on the failure to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to defend against evidence collected without its knowledge, impacting both assessment and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of upholding natural justice principles, stating that any violation undermines the validity of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 129 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The decision was based on the failure to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to defend against evidence collected without its knowledge, impacting both assessment and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of upholding natural justice principles, stating that any violation undermines the validity of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>