<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 128 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61803</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN ruled in three appeals challenging the levy of minimum penalty under section 271(1)(c) for income concealment. The tribunal found no deliberate concealment, attributing the omission to inadvertence. The penalty was canceled for the assessment years in question, emphasizing the significance of intent in penalty imposition for income concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 128 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61803</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN ruled in three appeals challenging the levy of minimum penalty under section 271(1)(c) for income concealment. The tribunal found no deliberate concealment, attributing the omission to inadvertence. The penalty was canceled for the assessment years in question, emphasizing the significance of intent in penalty imposition for income concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>