<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61791</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to grant registration to the firm (assessee), M/s. A.J. Lopez &amp;amp; Sons. The Tribunal disagreed with the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reasons for denying registration, including issues related to the minor&#039;s signature and profit allocation method. Emphasizing that minors can only be admitted to the benefits of the firm, not as full-fledged partners, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the firm, stating that the profit allocation method did not cast doubt on the genuineness of the firm. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the registration of the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61791</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to grant registration to the firm (assessee), M/s. A.J. Lopez &amp;amp; Sons. The Tribunal disagreed with the Income-tax Officer&#039;s reasons for denying registration, including issues related to the minor&#039;s signature and profit allocation method. Emphasizing that minors can only be admitted to the benefits of the firm, not as full-fledged partners, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the firm, stating that the profit allocation method did not cast doubt on the genuineness of the firm. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the registration of the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>