<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 140 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee concealed income by suppressing the value of closing stock, falling within clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271. Consequently, section 153(1)(b) applied, allowing the assessment completed on 30-7-1983 to be within the prescribed time limit. The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that the assessment was time-barred and instructing the CIT(A) to address other grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 140 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee concealed income by suppressing the value of closing stock, falling within clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271. Consequently, section 153(1)(b) applied, allowing the assessment completed on 30-7-1983 to be within the prescribed time limit. The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that the assessment was time-barred and instructing the CIT(A) to address other grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>