<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 68 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61787</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN dismissed the appeals raised by the assessee regarding a claim for deduction under section 80HHA for the business of toddy contracts. The Tribunal held that tapping toddy does not constitute manufacture or production of an article, based on precedents and interpretations of the relevant law. As a result, the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was rejected, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:54:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 68 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61787</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN dismissed the appeals raised by the assessee regarding a claim for deduction under section 80HHA for the business of toddy contracts. The Tribunal held that tapping toddy does not constitute manufacture or production of an article, based on precedents and interpretations of the relevant law. As a result, the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction was rejected, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>