<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 85 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that the share income of the husband for the period when the assessee was a partner should be included in her income, but not for the period after she ceased to be a partner. The Tribunal held that for section 64(1)(i) to apply, the assessee must have been a partner when the share income accrued to the spouse, emphasizing the timing of when income accrues in a partnership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 85 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that the share income of the husband for the period when the assessee was a partner should be included in her income, but not for the period after she ceased to be a partner. The Tribunal held that for section 64(1)(i) to apply, the assessee must have been a partner when the share income accrued to the spouse, emphasizing the timing of when income accrues in a partnership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>