<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 104 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ITO and AAC, determining that the full value of the consideration for the property transfer was Rs. 83,700, and the cost of improvement was Rs. 20,000. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the doctrine of diversion by overriding title and confirmed that the interest received from the bank was correctly added to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 104 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ITO and AAC, determining that the full value of the consideration for the property transfer was Rs. 83,700, and the cost of improvement was Rs. 20,000. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the doctrine of diversion by overriding title and confirmed that the interest received from the bank was correctly added to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>