<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 93 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the subsidy received by the assessee-firm for film production was not taxable as a revenue receipt or casual income. The subsidy was deemed an incentive for promoting the film industry in Kerala, not linked to specific expenses or profits. Additionally, the subsidy was to be taxed in the hands of the current partnership, as the firm was considered the same entity despite changes in partners. The decision favored the assessee, determining the subsidy as non-taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:45:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 93 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the subsidy received by the assessee-firm for film production was not taxable as a revenue receipt or casual income. The subsidy was deemed an incentive for promoting the film industry in Kerala, not linked to specific expenses or profits. Additionally, the subsidy was to be taxed in the hands of the current partnership, as the firm was considered the same entity despite changes in partners. The decision favored the assessee, determining the subsidy as non-taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>