<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 121 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61747</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin ruled in appeals concerning the deduction under section 80P(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a cooperative society engaged in banking activities and letting out surplus space in a building. The tribunal held that income from letting out property cannot be considered &quot;profits and gains&quot; under clause (c) as it is not a business activity specified in clauses (a) and (b). The tribunal applied the rule of ejusdem generis and emphasized that clause (c) refers to profits and gains from activities other than those specified in clauses (a) and (b), ultimately denying the exemption claimed under clause (c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 121 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61747</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin ruled in appeals concerning the deduction under section 80P(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a cooperative society engaged in banking activities and letting out surplus space in a building. The tribunal held that income from letting out property cannot be considered &quot;profits and gains&quot; under clause (c) as it is not a business activity specified in clauses (a) and (b). The tribunal applied the rule of ejusdem generis and emphasized that clause (c) refers to profits and gains from activities other than those specified in clauses (a) and (b), ultimately denying the exemption claimed under clause (c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>