<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that the machinery in the Nagercoil unit had been installed and used for business purposes, as evidenced by the production of coir products. The Tribunal found that the trial production was part of the assessee&#039;s business activities and that the machinery had been wholly used for the business. Therefore, the development rebate was allowed for the assessment year 1975-76.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that the machinery in the Nagercoil unit had been installed and used for business purposes, as evidenced by the production of coir products. The Tribunal found that the trial production was part of the assessee&#039;s business activities and that the machinery had been wholly used for the business. Therefore, the development rebate was allowed for the assessment year 1975-76.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>