<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 67 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in IT Appeal Nos. 605 and 607 (Coch.) of 1982, upholding the continuation of registration for the assessee-firm for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82. The decision was based on the interpretation of the partnership deed and compliance with section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the absence of specified loss shares did not invalidate the partnership deed or the firm&#039;s registration, given the historical context and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 67 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in IT Appeal Nos. 605 and 607 (Coch.) of 1982, upholding the continuation of registration for the assessee-firm for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82. The decision was based on the interpretation of the partnership deed and compliance with section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the absence of specified loss shares did not invalidate the partnership deed or the firm&#039;s registration, given the historical context and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>