<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61729</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the inclusion of interest in the hands of the appellant. It rejected the argument regarding the character of interest paid by the firm, emphasizing that interest on loans given by minors does not directly or indirectly arise from minor admission to partnership benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 66 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61729</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the inclusion of interest in the hands of the appellant. It rejected the argument regarding the character of interest paid by the firm, emphasizing that interest on loans given by minors does not directly or indirectly arise from minor admission to partnership benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>