<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the allowance of depreciation on assets leased to PSEB and NACAST, finding those transactions genuine. The issue of depreciation on other leases was remanded for fresh adjudication. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the software expenses as revenue expenditure, disagreeing with the capital expenditure treatment by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 279 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the allowance of depreciation on assets leased to PSEB and NACAST, finding those transactions genuine. The issue of depreciation on other leases was remanded for fresh adjudication. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the software expenses as revenue expenditure, disagreeing with the capital expenditure treatment by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>