<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 316 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on all three issues raised by the assessee: disallowance of depreciation on a jeep due to lack of evidence for exclusive business use, disallowance of expenses on freight and wages for lack of proof of genuineness, and disallowance of interest paid by the assessee for failure to establish the business purpose of the advance and diversion of interest-bearing funds for non-business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 316 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on all three issues raised by the assessee: disallowance of depreciation on a jeep due to lack of evidence for exclusive business use, disallowance of expenses on freight and wages for lack of proof of genuineness, and disallowance of interest paid by the assessee for failure to establish the business purpose of the advance and diversion of interest-bearing funds for non-business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>