<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and decide the deduction claim for interest on borrowed capital under section 36(1)(iii) based on the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The disallowance of the technical know-how fees claimed under section 35AB was upheld, with the Tribunal stating that the deduction period for such fees is limited to six consecutive years, and failure to claim it in one year does not extend this period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and decide the deduction claim for interest on borrowed capital under section 36(1)(iii) based on the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The disallowance of the technical know-how fees claimed under section 35AB was upheld, with the Tribunal stating that the deduction period for such fees is limited to six consecutive years, and failure to claim it in one year does not extend this period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>