<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 275 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61635</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A), ruling in favor of the assessee. It directed the recalculation of interest under sections 234B and 234C after allowing the set-off of MAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized that MAT credit should be considered at the advance tax computation stage, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 275 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61635</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A), ruling in favor of the assessee. It directed the recalculation of interest under sections 234B and 234C after allowing the set-off of MAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized that MAT credit should be considered at the advance tax computation stage, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>