<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 255 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and holding that interest under sections 139(8), 215, 217, 234A, and 234B could not be charged during reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal also found that the rectification orders under section 154 were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 255 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and holding that interest under sections 139(8), 215, 217, 234A, and 234B could not be charged during reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal also found that the rectification orders under section 154 were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>