<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the land in question was commercial, not agricultural, and therefore subject to capital gains tax. The enhanced compensation received was held taxable under Section 45(5)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the AO&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the land in question was commercial, not agricultural, and therefore subject to capital gains tax. The enhanced compensation received was held taxable under Section 45(5)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and reinstated the AO&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>