<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 300 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, providing specific directions on each issue. Promotional and product development expenses were deemed revenue in nature, not capital, thus deductible. The Tribunal excluded sales tax, excise duty, and freight from total turnover for Section 80HHC deductions. It allowed Section 80-I deductions for industrial undertakings, maintaining consistency with prior rulings. Managerial labor and factory staff salaries were upheld in closing stock valuation. Interest on capital for a new plant was allowed as revenue expenditure. ERP implementation expenses were considered revenue, and the Tribunal directed reevaluation of excise duty adjustments under Section 43B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 300 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, providing specific directions on each issue. Promotional and product development expenses were deemed revenue in nature, not capital, thus deductible. The Tribunal excluded sales tax, excise duty, and freight from total turnover for Section 80HHC deductions. It allowed Section 80-I deductions for industrial undertakings, maintaining consistency with prior rulings. Managerial labor and factory staff salaries were upheld in closing stock valuation. Interest on capital for a new plant was allowed as revenue expenditure. ERP implementation expenses were considered revenue, and the Tribunal directed reevaluation of excise duty adjustments under Section 43B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>