<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 311 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under s. 272A(2)(f) for the delay in filing declarations in Form No. 15H. The Tribunal considered ignorance of law as a reasonable cause for the delay, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed without a conscious disregard for statutory provisions. It concluded that the delay was unintentional, leading to the removal of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 311 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under s. 272A(2)(f) for the delay in filing declarations in Form No. 15H. The Tribunal considered ignorance of law as a reasonable cause for the delay, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed without a conscious disregard for statutory provisions. It concluded that the delay was unintentional, leading to the removal of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>