<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 305 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the addition of Rs. 1,54,283 in the building account. The assessing officer&#039;s reliance on the valuation officer&#039;s report was deemed improper, emphasizing the AO&#039;s duty to conduct an independent assessment. The Tribunal allowed grounds 1 to 6 raised by the appellant, following legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disputed addition being reversed based on the requirement for the AO to rely on their own findings rather than external reports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 305 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the addition of Rs. 1,54,283 in the building account. The assessing officer&#039;s reliance on the valuation officer&#039;s report was deemed improper, emphasizing the AO&#039;s duty to conduct an independent assessment. The Tribunal allowed grounds 1 to 6 raised by the appellant, following legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disputed addition being reversed based on the requirement for the AO to rely on their own findings rather than external reports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>