<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified the interpretation of Section 80HHC for supporting manufacturers selling to export houses, emphasizing turnover in sales to determine deduction eligibility. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to calculate the deduction based on sales to the export house, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The analysis highlighted legislative intent and dismissed a restrictive approach, affirming the deduction calculation method based on sales to the export house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified the interpretation of Section 80HHC for supporting manufacturers selling to export houses, emphasizing turnover in sales to determine deduction eligibility. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to calculate the deduction based on sales to the export house, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The analysis highlighted legislative intent and dismissed a restrictive approach, affirming the deduction calculation method based on sales to the export house.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>