<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 261 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61563</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 10,07,000 under s. 40A(3) of the IT Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was supported, citing the exception under r. 6DD(j) due to delayed payment realization when paid by cheque/draft and the genuineness of transactions. The ITAT emphasized genuine transactions, business expediency, and legal exceptions, concluding that the disallowance could not be sustained in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 261 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61563</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 10,07,000 under s. 40A(3) of the IT Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was supported, citing the exception under r. 6DD(j) due to delayed payment realization when paid by cheque/draft and the genuineness of transactions. The ITAT emphasized genuine transactions, business expediency, and legal exceptions, concluding that the disallowance could not be sustained in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>