<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, restoring the AO&#039;s additions regarding gifts received by the assessee and his wife, citing lack of proof of the gifts&#039; genuineness and potential involvement of undisclosed sources. However, the deletion of the addition for low household expenses was upheld, as there was insufficient evidence to support the higher estimation made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 245 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, restoring the AO&#039;s additions regarding gifts received by the assessee and his wife, citing lack of proof of the gifts&#039; genuineness and potential involvement of undisclosed sources. However, the deletion of the addition for low household expenses was upheld, as there was insufficient evidence to support the higher estimation made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>