<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,04,470 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified for the brought forward loss claim and the unexplained cash credits, as the assessee had acted in good faith and provided explanations supported by evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=100001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceling the penalty of Rs. 2,04,470 imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified for the brought forward loss claim and the unexplained cash credits, as the assessee had acted in good faith and provided explanations supported by evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>