<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed?type=Tariff" rel="self" type="text/xml" />
        <title>Tax Updates - Daily Update</title>
        <link>https://www.taxtmi.com</link>
        <description>One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws in India</description>
        <category>Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax Services</category>
        <copyright>TaxTMI.Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@taxtmi.com</webMaster>
        <managingEditor>editor@taxtmi.com</managingEditor>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
<title>JOB WORK: ESSENTIAL COMPLIANCE</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17342</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17342</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST job work treats processing of a registered principal's goods as a service while ownership remains with the principal, including where processing amounts to manufacture. Goods must move on prescribed delivery challans and, where required, e-way bills; the principal reports movements in Form GST ITC-04. Return movements require an endorsed or fresh challan and a service invoice for processing charges. The discussion identifies differing approaches to e-way bill return value, including composite goods value versus service charges and applicable tax. Failure to return or directly supply goods within prescribed periods triggers deemed supply consequences and interest.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Digital Personal Data Protection (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2026.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147215</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147215</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 9(1) is corrected to clarify that a Data Fiduciary must obtain verifiable consent before processing personal data of a child or of a person with disability having a lawful guardian. Section 10(2)(c)(ii) replaces "audit" with "data audit," aligning periodic audit terminology for Significant Data Fiduciaries with the independent data auditor requirement and clarifying the intended data protection audit obligation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reserved High Court Judgments: Constitutional Timelines, Accountability and Litigant Remedies</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2535</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2535</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reserved High Court judgments are subject to a three-month framework for a reasoned pronouncement, supported by monthly monitoring, status disclosures, date-recorded certified copies, and automated notice to advocates. Urgent matters may receive an operative-part pronouncement, but reasons must be uploaded within seven days or, where practical difficulties exist, within fifteen days. Parties may seek early pronouncement after the specified period and, after further delay, request withdrawal and assignment for a fresh hearing.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2535.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2535.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Inverted-duty ITC refunds cover higher-rated component inputs, not just principal materials, subject to statutory exclusions and formula-based limits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104683</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104683</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Refund of accumulated ITC under an inverted duty structure depends on whether higher-rated input goods cause credit accumulation relative to output supplies, not solely on whether the principal raw material and output carry the same rate. Section 54(3)(ii) permits the claim subject to notified exclusions, credit eligibility, and proof of a causal nexus between qualifying inputs and accumulation. Input services and capital goods are excluded from Net ITC for the Rule 89(5) calculation. Rule 89(5) limits refundable quantum, while the prescribed process requires electronic filing, invoice details, ledger debit and verification. Administrative circulars cannot add a principal-input condition beyond the statutory test; claimants must substantiate rate inversion, manufacturing nexus, computation and procedural compliance.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104683.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104683.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory timing for GST detention: delayed penalty orders are invalid despite administrative obstacles or intervening regulatory action.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104682</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104682</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(3) of the CGST Act imposes separate mandatory deadlines: the penalty notice must be issued within seven days of detention or seizure, and the penalty order must follow within seven days after service of that notice. The latter period runs from service, not from a reply, valuation exercise or other intervening event. Because detention and seizure are coercive restraints on goods and conveyances, administrative difficulty, minimal delay and inspection-stage timelines cannot extend either deadline; a delayed Section 129 order is invalid. The affected person must receive an opportunity of hearing. Invalidity of Section 129 proceedings does not preclude separately lawful action under other GST provisions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104682.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104682.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Supplier tax payment remains a cumulative input tax credit condition, while reversal demands require transaction-specific evidence and reasons.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104681</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104681</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act constitutionally requires tax charged on a supply to be actually paid to the Government before input tax credit is available; invoice possession, receipt of supply and recipient payment do not substitute for this cumulative condition. The Supreme Court affirmed that a bona fide-purchaser exception cannot be read into the provision by relying on the distinct Delhi VAT framework. Section 41 and Rule 37A require reversal where supplier tax payment conditions are unmet, while permitting re-availment after subsequent compliance. Constitutional validity does not permit mechanical denial of credit: authorities must establish the relevant statutory facts, consider transaction-specific evidence, provide a hearing and issue reasoned findings.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104681.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104681.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) conducts Jan Samvad at Malana in Kullu District to create preventive drug awareness and to promote development</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75055</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75055</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Preventive outreach in Malana village promoted drug awareness, youth engagement, community participation and alternative development in an area associated with illicit cannabis cultivation. Residents were sensitised to the harmful effects of cannabis, charas and hashish oil consumption and encouraged to pursue sustainable alternatives, including apiculture, animal husbandry, dairy activities and tourism. Community discussions addressed livelihood barriers, ecological concerns, and commitments to refrain from drug consumption and discourage illicit cannabis cultivation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Price Depression in Securities Markets: Evidentiary Requirements under the PFUTP Regulations</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2534</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2534</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Settlement-price depression under the PFUTP framework requires cogent proof of a manipulative act, device, scheme or artifice, not merely a substantial short derivative position, closing-window sales, or an incentive to benefit from a lower settlement price. Position concentration and position-limit non-disclosure are distinct from PFUTP fraud. Sales below the last traded price require market-wide causal analysis of other trading activity, execution mechanics, benchmark methodology, commercial rationale, and actual price impact. A genuine hedge and agency-attributed exposure do not, without further proof, establish manipulation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2534.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2534.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Adopted Joint Statement after the India-UK Financial Markets Dialogue 2026, held in London</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75054</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75054</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-UK financial-markets cooperation covers capital-market connectivity, cross-border listings, investor access and development of GIFT IFSC as an international financial centre. Engagement also addresses insurance, pensions, asset management, sustainable-finance disclosures and cross-border investment. Fintech cooperation includes digital public infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, data exchange, responsible artificial intelligence, fraud prevention, cyber security and operational resilience. Cross-border payments work prioritises reduced frictions, transparency, efficiency and interoperability of electronic payment infrastructures.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Vested appellate rights protect penalty-only GST appeals from later pre-deposit burdens when adjudication began before amendment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104680</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104680</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 107(6)'s substituted proviso, requiring a ten per cent pre-deposit for penalty-only appeals, does not apply where a formal show-cause notice commenced adjudication before 1 October 2025. The High Court treated the right of appeal and its associated conditions as substantive and vested when the lis begins. Because the new filing-stage deposit may bar access to the appellate forum, it is an onerous condition rather than merely procedural. In the absence of express retrospective operation or necessary intendment, appeals from pre-amendment proceedings remain governed by the earlier regime, while admitted amounts remain payable. The Appellate Authority has no inherent power to waive an applicable mandatory deposit.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104680.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104680.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Foreign Leave Travel Concession and Tax Deduction at Source under Sections 10(5), 192 and 201</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2533</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign LTC/LFC payments for itineraries containing an overseas leg are outside the Section 10(5) exemption, which is confined to actual eligible domestic travel subject to Rule 2B shortest-route and fare conditions. Under Section 192, employers must include known non-exempt payments in estimated salary and deduct tax; they cannot disregard available claim records showing foreign or circuitous travel. A recovery restraint does not automatically suspend the deduction obligation. Section 201 recipient-compliance conditions, interest, and penalty based on reasonable cause require separate analysis.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2533.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2533.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 74 extended limitation requires pleaded facts establishing fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, not a mere tax mismatch.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104679</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104679</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 74 extended limitation under the CGST Act applies only where a tax shortfall, erroneous refund or wrongful input tax credit arose by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. A show cause notice must plead foundational facts linking deliberate conduct to the alleged evasion; a mismatch, short payment, audit objection or mechanical use of statutory terms is insufficient. The proper officer must independently form the required satisfaction. Section 75 prevents an adjudicating order from adding grounds beyond the notice, so deficient fraud allegations cannot be cured later. Section 74 applies through Financial Year 2023-24, while Section 74A introduces a unified notice regime for later periods.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104679.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104679.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary Policy Statement, 2026-27 Resolution of the Monetary Policy Committee October 5 to 7, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75051</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75051</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Monetary Policy Committee increased the policy repo rate under the liquidity adjustment facility by 25 basis points to 5.50 per cent and changed the stance to calibrated tightening. The standing deposit facility rate became 5.25 per cent, while the marginal standing facility rate and Bank Rate became 5.75 per cent. The stance excludes near-term rate cuts; future action may comprise a rate hike or pause, contingent on growth, inflation, underlying price pressures, second-round effects and demand impulses.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Commerce Secretary Shri Rajesh Agrawal Calls for Greater Utilisation of India-EFTA TEPA Opportunities</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75053</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75053</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-EFTA TEPA establishes reciprocal market-access commitments, with EFTA coverage extending to most Indian exports and full coverage for non-agricultural products. Tariff predictability is intended to support investment planning, supply-chain development and longer-term business partnerships. Agricultural opportunities may arise where duties have been reduced to zero. Article 7.1 includes an investment commitment under which the EFTA States are to aim to increase foreign direct investment into India and facilitate employment generation within specified implementation periods.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Commerce and Industry Minister Shri Piyush Goyal Holds Meetings with Leading U.S. Companies in New York to Strengthen India–U.S. Trade and Investment Ties</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75052</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75052</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-U.S. trade and investment engagement was pursued through discussions with leading United States companies on expanding investment, partnerships and commercial operations in India. Financial-sector discussions addressed private equity, asset and wealth management, insurance, and financial services, including prospective engagement aligned with the objective of insurance access for all by 2047.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Re-assignment of appeals pending in Kolkata Zone in partial modification of Order No. 04/2025 dated 28.04.2025</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71534</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71534</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Listed Central Excise and Service Tax appeals filed on or after 1 July 2017 are reassigned to specified Central Excise Officers for passing Orders-in-Appeal under the applicable enactment. The allocation applies to matters concerning acts done or omitted before the commencement of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Each appeal is identified by its appeal number, assessee name and registration number and is assigned to the designated appellate officer.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>An Approach Paper on Expanding the scope and coverage for the Index of Services Production</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75050</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75050</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The Index of Services Production is proposed to expand beyond its initial formal-sector coverage, which relies on high-frequency administrative data and GST outward-supplies data. Education, Human Health and Residential Care, and Public Administration and Defence are proposed for inclusion. Their incorporation would increase coverage of services-sector Gross Value Added and support aggregation of sub-sectoral indices into a unified measure of short-term services-sector movements. Stakeholder views are invited on the proposed methodology.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>DRI cracks down on cross-border gold smuggling along Indo-Bangladesh border; seizes over 8.3 kg foreign-origin gold; 4 arrested</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75049</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75049</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Intelligence-led customs enforcement targeted cross-border gold smuggling through surveillance and interception of four persons travelling from a border route. Personal searches recovered foreign-origin gold biscuits concealed in specially tailored cloth waist belts. Seventy-two gold biscuits were seized under relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the four persons were arrested. Investigation continues into organised networks and wider syndicates involved in the movement and distribution of smuggled gold.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>No ITC, Limited Reach: The Price Of Six Per Cent Composition</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17538</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17538</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 10(2A) provides a residual composition levy for eligible service providers and mixed suppliers who cannot enter the conventional composition scheme. Eligibility depends on PAN-level aggregate turnover within the prescribed ceiling, collective election by all registrations under the PAN, and continuous compliance during the year. The combined 6% tax applies to turnover of supplies rather than profit, while composition taxpayers cannot collect tax separately or claim input tax credit. Inter-State outward supplies and platform-based services through specified electronic commerce operators remain restricted, and reverse-charge tax continues at regular rates.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17538.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17538.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>HIGHER AND SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES AFTER RECENT AMENDEMENT -analysed to show that multiple designations are in practice. These need reduction and simplification to avoid litigation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17537</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17537</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 118 enables the Board to establish administrative subordination among income-tax authorities based on functional jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction and assigned work. The hierarchy runs from the Central Board of Direct Taxes through principal, director, commissioner, deputy, assistant, officer, recovery and inspector levels. The amended appellate arrangement places Joint Commissioners (Appeals) and Additional Commissioners (Appeals) under Principal Chief Commissioners and Chief Commissioners. Administrative control cannot dictate a particular assessment or case disposal and must preserve the discretion of first appellate authorities.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17537.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17537.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Good times have started for the taxpayers through GSTAT.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17536</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17536</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reasoned decision-making in GST adjudication requires quasi-judicial authorities to give cogent, clear and succinct reasons, based on relevant material and free from extraneous considerations. This safeguard of natural justice restrains arbitrary power, promotes transparency and accountability, and enables judicial review. Original adjudication and first appeals should address deficiencies in reasoning rather than shift substantive correction to later appellate review.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17536.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17536.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs held your genuine shipment on an IPR complaint?Check the registration first</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17535</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17535</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Registration of a right holder's notice is the condition that makes allegedly infringing imports deemed prohibited and supports the ordinary suspension of clearance. A bare complaint does not suffice. Customs may initiate an ex officio suspension on prima facie evidence or reasonable grounds, but prompt reasons must be communicated and the right holder must comply with notice and bond requirements within five days. General importer-protection and Customs indemnity bonds, together with consignment-specific security, support continued detention. Failure to join proceedings or satisfy applicable bonds and time limits requires clearance, subject to other import conditions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17535.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17535.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Factual Disputes Call For Adjudication, Not Premature Writ Intervention</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17534</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17534</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Audit findings may identify discrepancies and support further action, but they do not create an enforceable tax liability. A show-cause notice initiates statutory adjudication, in which the taxpayer may contest the proposed demand through records, evidence and legal submissions. Rule 101(4) requires genuine consideration of the audit reply, though a brief response does not by itself establish complete non-consideration. The Adjudicating Authority must independently examine limitation, computation, audit scope, the legal basis of the demand, and whether a Form GST DRC-03 payment was voluntary or lawfully appropriable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17534.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17534.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tamil Nadu's GST Collection Paradox: Falling Domestic Collections, Rising State Receipts</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17533</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Domestic GST collections and post-settlement SGST are distinct measures and may move differently because IGST settlement and input-tax-credit utilisation affect final State receipts. Tamil Nadu's domestic collection decline therefore requires reconciliation before it is attributed to economic contraction, evasion or weakened compliance. The analysis should identify taxpayer-specific and sector-specific movements, quantify GST rate-rationalisation effects, reconcile output liability with cash and credit discharge, verify settlement schedules, and examine State-specific refunds. Aggregate revenue weakness may support risk analysis but cannot replace evidence and statutory safeguards in proceedings against individual taxpayers.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17533.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17533.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CURRENT ECONOMY AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GST</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17532</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17532</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST administration introduces Multistate Registration for normal taxpayers seeking registrations under the same PAN across multiple States or Union Territories. A Master TRN enables submission of Common Registration Information, followed by separate jurisdiction-specific TRNs with auto-populated but editable common details. GSTAT procedures cover respondents' replies and transfer appeals for identical legal questions pending before different benches, allowing qualifying taxpayers with multiple PAN-linked registrations to consolidate matters. Potential policy measures include easing blocked input tax credit and protecting genuine recipients affected by supplier defaults.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17532.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17532.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>FILING OF FORMS UNDER INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS OF PERSONAL GUARANTORS TO CORPORATE DEBTOR – PART I</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17531</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17531</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Personal guarantor insolvency resolution proceedings require resolution professionals to electronically file prescribed PGIRP forms with complete and accurate records. PGIRP-1 records the interim resolution professional's section 99 report and recommendation on admission or rejection. PGIRP-2A records rejection of an application under section 100, while PGIRP-2B records admission, publication of a public notice, and creditor claim timelines. Filing failures, incomplete records, or inaccurate information may attract regulatory action, including refusal to issue or renew an Authorisation for Assignment.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17531.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17531.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interest on wrongly availed and utilised input tax credit runs from actual utilisation until reversal under GST rules.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104642</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104642</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest on wrongly availed and utilised input tax credit must be computed from the actual date of utilisation until the date of reversal. Section 50(3), read with rule 88B(3), does not permit interest to be calculated from an earlier date merely because the credit was wrongly availed. Where interest has been computed from an incorrect earlier date, the assessment order requires modification to apply the revised computation. Statutory appeal or revision remains available for any other disputed issue.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104642.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104642.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Natural justice in GST appeals requires hearings and reasoned orders; non-prosecution cannot end appeals without merits review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104641</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104641</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 107 of the GST law requires the Appellate Authority to provide a hearing, make necessary inquiry, and issue a written order identifying the issues, decision, and reasons. An appellant's non-appearance may permit ex parte consideration but does not permit dismissal for non-prosecution. An appellate order that ignores an adjournment request and merely records that no interference is warranted, without reasoned consideration of the appeal grounds, breaches those requirements. The matter was remanded for fresh merits adjudication after hearing.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104641.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104641.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Alternative statutory remedy governs Customs adjudication challenges after orders, making writ relief on securities and assessments unavailable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104640</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104640</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs adjudication orders require challenges to determinations, related bank guarantees, and alleged adjudicatory delay to be pursued before the statutory appellate forum in the first instance. A direction to defer matters involving delay in adjudication does not extend to a writ where Orders-in-Original have already been issued; the dispute is no longer one concerning pending adjudication. Relief restraining finalisation of provisional assessments becomes infructuous after adjudication. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, writ jurisdiction cannot bypass the appellate remedy, and non-disclosure of a material prior adjudication order affects writ relief. The merits of the orders and consequences of alleged delay remain open before the appellate authority.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104640.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104640.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Irrevocable joint development rights prevented land exclusion from CIRP, requiring status quo pending appellate disposal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104639</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104639</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unilateral cancellation of an irrevocable joint development agreement and power of attorney was treated prima facie as ineffective where they conferred development rights on the corporate debtor and barred unilateral revocation. The construction period ran from requisite approvals and had been extended, while an alleged no-objection remained conditional and unaccepted. Land subject to mortgage and possible third-party rights was not excluded from the corporate insolvency resolution process at this stage. The landowner could intervene, and all parties were required to maintain status quo pending disposal of the appeal.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104639.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104639.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Special bail treatment for women accused of money laundering permits departure from twin conditions, subject to case-specific judicial discretion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104638</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104638</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The first proviso to section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act creates a case-specific exception for women seeking bail from the statutory twin conditions. The benefit is discretionary, not automatic, and depends on the facts. Completion of investigation, filing of the complaint, time in custody, and absence of any investigative need for the woman's presence supported the grant of regular bail; no basis arose to cancel it.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104638.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104638.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Portal service of GST show cause notices requires effective intimation; absent notice invalidates adjudication and requires fresh hearing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104637</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104637</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Uploading a GST show cause notice solely under the portal's "Additional Notice and Orders" tab, without separate intimation, denied the taxpayer an effective opportunity to reply and breached the principles of natural justice. As the statutory appeal was dismissed solely on limitation without consideration on merits, the show cause notice, adjudication order and appellate order were quashed. Fresh proceedings were directed through a fresh show cause notice, an opportunity of hearing, and a reasoned adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104637.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104637.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input Tax Credit reconciliation requires examination of return records before excess-credit demands are reconsidered and bank attachments released.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104636</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104636</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input Tax Credit reconciliation through GSTR-2A/2B, GSTR-3B and the annual return may provide prima facie evidence of available credit. A tax demand alleging excess utilisation of Input Tax Credit requires reconsideration where those material records were not duly examined, with an opportunity to establish the credit claimed. Verification of asserted recovery of part of the demand is also required before releasing a bank attachment. The tax demand was set aside for fresh consideration, and the attachment was to be lifted subject to verification of recovery.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104636.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104636.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory limitation bars appellate condonation beyond the prescribed outer limit, but implemented registration restoration made departmental challenges infructuous.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104635</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104635</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Statutory appellate jurisdiction does not permit the First Appellate Authority to condone delay beyond the enactment's prescribed outer limit; equitable relief available in writ jurisdiction cannot enlarge that power. Condonation beyond that limit renders consequential appellate orders legally unsustainable. Where the Department has implemented those orders by restoring cancelled registrations, altering the registrants' legal and commercial position and permitting business continuation, it cannot seek annulment without addressing the consequences of restoration. The absence of effective, workable relief makes the Department's challenge infructuous and not maintainable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104635.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104635.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Temporal application of customs exemptions protects pre-amendment multimodal consignments from denial of provisional release consideration.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104634</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104634</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs exemption amendments cannot be applied to imported second-hand specialised equipment handed to the first carrier before the amendment took effect, where multimodal transport is recognised under the Customs Act. A request for provisional release must therefore be considered under Section 110A and cannot be refused merely by relying on the subsequent amendment. Earlier directions concerning provisional release of similar goods remain applicable where no distinguishing feature exists. Upon compliance with lawful conditions, the goods are to be provisionally released pending adjudication.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104634.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104634.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory revision.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104633</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104633</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The first proviso to Section 129A(1) excludes Tribunal appellate jurisdiction over orders relating to goods imported as baggage. Gold chains brought into India by an arriving international passenger retain their character as baggage regardless of the method of carriage or issues concerning the merits of confiscation. Challenges to confiscation orders involving such baggage must therefore be pursued through the statutory revisionary remedy under Section 129DD, rather than by appeal before the Tribunal. Appeal papers filed before the Tribunal are to be returned for pursuing revision.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104633.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104633.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority disputes.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104632</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104632</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Article 227 supervisory intervention in ongoing arbitration is confined to a manifest and patent lack of inherent jurisdiction. Where the arbitration agreement, its invocation for a joint venture, and commencement of the reference are undisputed, a dispute over a liquidator's authority to represent the joint venture and continue proceedings falls within the arbitral tribunal's competence. A joint venture constituent that remains silent after notice of the liquidator's asserted authority may be treated as having acquiesced. Equitable supervisory relief is unavailable where intervention seeks to terminate a pre-existing claim rather than protect the joint venture's interests, particularly where the conduct is in bad faith.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104632.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104632.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 32A immunity protects successor companies from pre-CIRP corporate offences after approved resolution plans change management or control.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104631</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104631</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 32A(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ends a corporate debtor's liability for offences committed before commencement of CIRP once an approved resolution plan results in a qualifying change in management or control. The immunity can protect a successor company that takes over and amalgamates with the former corporate debtor, preventing civil or criminal liability for the predecessor's pre-CIRP acts, including alleged Air Act offences. Its application is company-specific: proceedings may be quashed against the protected successor without affecting prosecution of the remaining accused.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104631.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104631.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tribunal leave for proceedings against a company in liquidation is mandatory where the suit seeks joint reliefs.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104630</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104630</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tribunal leave is mandatory for continuation of a pending suit by or against a company in liquidation. Where joint reliefs are sought against the company and a co-defendant, the claimant cannot maintain the suit or appeal by deleting the company from the parties. The liquidator must be served and represented in proceedings involving the company in liquidation. The commercial judgment was set aside, and the suit was remitted for fresh consideration only if leave is obtained from the Tribunal to continue proceedings against the company.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104630.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104630.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Locus Standi of Non-Parties Limits Recall of Resolution-Plan Implementation Orders and Supports Time Exclusion for Delayed Possession</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104629</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104629</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Non-party former management, including a shareholder and personal guarantor, cannot seek recall of an order concerning resolution-plan implementation merely because counsel appeared in the proceedings. Participation rights are subordinate to timely insolvency resolution; without creditor status, impleadment, permitted intervention, or legal injury, no locus standi arises. Where a successful resolution applicant has paid the upfront amount but possession of the corporate debtor's property remains withheld through unauthorised occupation, excluding time for payment obligations facilitates implementation without modifying the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority may grant that extension without express committee of creditors concurrence.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104629.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104629.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Shareholder standing in resolution-plan appeals excludes challenges based solely on shareholding, and unsupported fraud claims cannot cure the defect.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104628</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104628</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Individual shareholders do not, merely by virtue of shareholding, qualify as aggrieved persons entitled to appeal approval of a corporate debtor's resolution plan. Allegations that post-approval modifications were fraudulent cannot expand standing unless supported by specific material. Homebuyers who have not independently challenged the resolution plan cannot contest it indirectly by supporting a shareholder's appeal. The shareholder's challenge to the approved resolution plan was therefore treated as not maintainable, and the related interlocutory applications were rejected.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104628.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104628.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Room-service food sales excluded from service tax; liquor-brand promotion remained taxable only within the normal limitation period.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104627</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104627</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Separately billed room-service food and beverages supplied in hotel rooms were treated as sales rather than restaurant services because hotel rooms were not restaurant premises and no evidence linked the charges to room-service value; the related service-tax demand was set aside. Exclusive liquor-brand listing, displays and branded accessories constituted taxable promotional or sponsorship service, leaving that demand sustainable only within the normal limitation period. Actual electricity charges recovered from tenants on sub-meter readings and remitted to suppliers were not consideration for renting, so the demand was set aside. Extended limitation required deliberate evasion, not mere non-declaration; the surviving demand was restricted to the normal period.]]></description>
<category>Service Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104627.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104627.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Parallel Criminal Acquittal Does Not Defeat Independently Acknowledged Cheque Liability or Statutory Presumptions in Dishonour Proceedings</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104626</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104626</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Parallel criminal acquittal for failure to prove penal ingredients does not by itself negate an independently acknowledged financial liability supporting cheque dishonour proceedings. A notarized agreement and written declaration may establish a legally enforceable debt. Once foundational facts are proved, presumptions of consideration and discharge arise and require a probable, material-supported defence; an uncorroborated snatched-cheque assertion without a contemporaneous police complaint or bank intimation is insufficient. Registered dispatch to the drawer's correct address supports due service of the statutory demand notice, while revisional review remains limited to perversity, lack of evidence, or material legal or procedural error.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104626.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104626.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory GST Appeal Channels Challenges to Consolidated Notices into Appellate Review Rather Than Writ Adjudication</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104621</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104621</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Availability of an efficacious statutory GST appeal generally weighs against writ adjudication of challenges to a consolidated show-cause notice. Objections that the notice is barred by limitation, issued without jurisdiction, or impermissibly combines separate financial years may involve disputed questions of fact and law suitable for appellate examination. The statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act preserves those objections for determination. The writ petition was relegated to that remedy, subject to an adjusted pre-deposit, with no coercive action until the appeal attains finality.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104621.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104621.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Anticipatory bail after CGST summons remains maintainable, but requires circumstances justifying pre-arrest protection during investigation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104620</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104620</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Anticipatory bail following a CGST summons is not premature merely because no arrest order exists: summons alone neither establishes arrest nor makes a person an accused, but tangible circumstances may create a real and reasonable apprehension of arrest. Such apprehension only engages anticipatory-bail jurisdiction; it does not establish entitlement to pre-arrest protection. In an investigation concerning alleged clandestine manufacture and clearance, outstanding inquiries, a co-accused's arrest, and alleged non-cooperation supported the need for possible further interrogation. The application was therefore refused, as investigation requirements outweighed the requested extraordinary protection.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104620.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104620.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Show-cause notice service is mandatory before ex parte GST demand; non-service requires fresh adjudication after a hearing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104619</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104619</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Service of the show-cause notice through the GST portal, registered post, or e-mail is essential before an ex parte GST demand may be sustained. Where the record contains no material establishing such service and the taxpayer received no opportunity to submit a defence or be heard, the adjudication breaches the required process. The adjudication and appellate orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after furnishing the show-cause notice, permitting objections, and granting a hearing.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104619.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104619.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Natural justice in ex parte GST adjudication secured fresh consideration where pregnancy prevented participation and appellate limitation had expired.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104618</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Natural justice in ex parte GST adjudication required fresh consideration where medical records substantiated the proprietor's pregnancy and consequent inability to participate. Expiry of the statutory appellate limitation left no appellate remedy. The ex parte GST demand was set aside subject to deposit of 10% of the tax demanded and remitted from the reply-and-document-production stage, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Non-appearance as directed would automatically revive the earlier order.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104618.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104618.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST on compulsory acquisition of immovable property cannot be deducted because expropriation is not a taxable supply.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104617</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104617</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsory acquisition of land and buildings under the State's eminent-domain power is an expropriation, not a supply of goods or services for GST purposes. Land and buildings attached to land are immovable property, and landowners do not sell goods or provide services merely by surrendering property pursuant to statutory acquisition. GST deducted from compensation for such acquisition therefore lacks statutory basis. The deduction was treated as exceeding legal authority, with the affected compensation notice quashed to that extent and refund of the deducted GST with interest directed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104617.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104617.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory delay-condonation limits restrict GST appellate jurisdiction, while restored registrations render departmental challenges infructuous after implementation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104616</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104616</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Statutory outer limits on condonation of delay in GST registration-cancellation appeals confine the First Appellate Authority to the power expressly granted. Constitutional-court directions issued in extraordinary jurisdiction cannot enlarge that statutory power, and equity or substantial justice cannot displace the prescribed limit; appeals entertained after that limit are without jurisdiction. Where the Department has implemented appellate orders by restoring cancelled registrations, its own challenge becomes infructuous because the restored legal and commercial position cannot be unsettled without affecting intervening transactions. Such departmental appeals are not maintainable after implementation of the impugned orders.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104616.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104616.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Notional Rental Income Excluded for Unsold Flats That Remain Legally Unoccupiable Without an Occupancy Certificate</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104615</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104615</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Notional rental income under Section 23(1)(a) is not chargeable on unsold flats during a period in which they are legally unoccupiable because no occupancy certificate has been issued. A completion certificate alone does not establish legal occupiability for this purpose. Consequently, notional rental income cannot form the basis for revision of an assessment for that period, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104615.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104615.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Company-funded jewellery held for safekeeping does not constitute a cash loan or deposit, making the related penalty unsustainable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104614</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104614</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Use of a company's disclosed income to purchase jewellery on its behalf does not, without more, constitute acceptance by its managing director of a cash loan or deposit. Storage of company jewellery at the managing director's residence or in his locker for safekeeping does not alter that character. Characterising the arrangement as a cash loan or deposit on assumptions, presumptions or surmise renders the related penalty unsustainable; the penalty was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104614.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104614.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Jurisdiction over amalgamating companies fails when TDS orders target entities that ceased to exist after notified amalgamation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104613</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104613</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Jurisdiction over an amalgamating company ends when it ceases to exist following amalgamation. A section 201 order issued and served in the former company's name, despite prior notification to the TDS authority, suffers a jurisdictional defect; referring to the successor company in the body of the order does not cure it. The order was void ab initio and quashed, while the issue of interest under section 201(1A) remained academic.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104613.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104613.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interest on belated refund claims is unavailable when the return was filed late without prior condonation of delay.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104612</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest under section 244A on a refund claimed through a return filed after the statutory deadline depends on the return's validity and prior condonation of delay. A return filed late without a preceding condonation application is treated as invalid for this purpose. Clause (ii) of paragraph 6 of the CBDT circular applies generally to belated refund claims, rather than only to supplementary refund claims, when read with the circular's preceding provisions. Statutory interest is therefore unavailable on refunds claimed through such belated returns.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104612.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104612.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment based on reviewed loan evidence fails without fresh material, while post-April electronic notices require section 148A compliance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104611</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104611</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment of a loan credit previously examined in scrutiny cannot rest on the same confirmation, bank statements and balance sheet without fresh information or tangible material; adopting a different view is an impermissible change of opinion. Separately, an electronic notice served on or after 1 April 2021 must follow section 148A: a show-cause notice, supply of material, consideration of the taxpayer's reply, and an order before issuing a notice under section 148. Failure to follow this sequence invalidates reassessment. On these independent grounds, the reassessment notice and consequential order were quashed, without deciding the loan-credit addition on merits.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104611.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104611.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Foreign tax credit remains available where delayed prescribed-form filing is procedural and substantive eligibility is undisputed.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104610</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104610</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign tax credit for Australian employment income cannot be denied solely because a belated return and Form No. 67 were filed late where substantive entitlement and compliance with other required formalities are undisputed. Rule 128's timing requirement is treated as a directory procedural condition in subordinate legislation and cannot curtail substantive entitlement to foreign tax credit. The credit claim was consequently required to be accepted, and the denial was set aside.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104610.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104610.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Concealment Penalty Fails When Appeal Effect Deletes Underlying Additions, While Notice-Default Penalty Is Also Deleted</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104609</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104609</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Deletion of reassessment additions through an appeal-effect order removed the basis for concealment penalty, as no concealed income remained when the penalty order was passed. The Tribunal therefore deleted the concealment penalty. Penalty for non-compliance with statutory notices was also deleted where the assessee had stated, through affidavits, unfamiliarity with tax law and reliance on a professional for compliance. The Tribunal treated these circumstances as warranting relief in the interest of justice, allowing both appeals and deleting both penalties.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104609.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104609.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment Notices to Deceased Assessees Are Jurisdictionally Invalid Without Timely Notice to Legal Representatives and Void</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104608</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104608</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment proceedings initiated by a notice issued in the name of an assessee already deceased are jurisdictionally defective. A valid reassessment notice must be addressed to a living assessee or, where permitted, to the legal representative. Provisions allowing continuation of existing proceedings against legal representatives do not cure proceedings initiated only after the assessee's death. Where no fresh notice is issued to the legal representatives within the prescribed period, the reassessment lacks jurisdiction. The notice, consequential reassessment proceedings and assessment order are void in law and liable to be quashed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104608.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104608.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Receipt-based treaty taxation requires royalties and technical-service fees to follow receipts, while restricted software supplies are not royalty.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104607</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104607</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Royalty and fees for technical services under the India-Germany DTAA are taxable on receipt rather than accrual basis. Consideration for restricted, non-exclusive standard software licences that do not transfer copyright rights is not royalty under the Act or treaty. Separate scopes of work, invoicing, consideration and no profit-and-loss sharing prevent consortium members from constituting an association of persons; joint and several liability and indemnities alone are insufficient. Offshore equipment-supply income is not taxable in India merely because it forms part of a composite project. Transfer-pricing adjustments require a prescribed method and cannot rest on an ad hoc mark-up where transaction differences are reconciled and benchmarking is undisputed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104607.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104607.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Agency termination compensation is business income, while export and eligible-unit deductions depend on direct nexus.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104606</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104606</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Termination compensation under a distribution arrangement that is substantively an agency relationship is treated as business income rather than a capital receipt, and taxation is confined to the settlement actually received. A non-compete covenant integral to acquiring and protecting a trademark qualifies as a depreciable intangible asset. For section 80-IB, only costs directly connected with an eligible undertaking should reduce its profit; allocation of finance, research, travel, head-office and export-promotion costs depends on factual nexus. Section 80HHC excludes receipts lacking a direct export nexus, while concurrent 80-IB and 80HHC deductions remain subject to the gross-total-income ceiling. A purely legal additional ground based on the existing record may be considered.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104606.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104606.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Speaking orders for customs reassessment are mandatory; value enhancement without one cannot displace the declared import value.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104605</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104605</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Enhancement of declared customs value during reassessment under section 17(4) requires a speaking order under section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. Failure to issue that order violates the statutory requirement and makes the reassessment unsustainable. The declared value must be accepted, with the assessments and appellate order set aside and consequential relief granted.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104605.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104605.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Nexus between attached bank balances and proceeds of crime is essential for PMLA attachment confirmation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104604</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104604</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[PMLA provisional attachment of an NBFC's bank balance requires material establishing that the property constitutes proceeds of crime connected with a scheduled offence. FIR allegations alone were insufficient where final chargesheets did not arraign the NBFC or its lending application, and no material showed that an unauthorised fintech operated under its licence or that the NBFC received identified criminal proceeds. Legitimate lending income and an outstanding contractual loan cannot be characterised as proceeds of crime without supporting evidence. As no nexus was identified between the attached balance and criminal proceeds, confirmation of the attachment was set aside.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104604.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104604.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax classification by form at sale places GRD Powder and GRD Mix under the residuary entry, not non-alcoholic beverages.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104603</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104603</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tax classification of GRD Powder and GRD Mix depends on the goods' identity and physical form at the time of supply, not on their subsequent use after mixing with milk or water. Strict construction of taxing statutes requires classification at the taxable event; a purchaser's use cannot convert a powder or biscuit-form product into a beverage. The entry for non-alcoholic drinks and beverages, read ejusdem generis with syrups, cordials, distilled juices, ark and essences, covers liquids or liquid preparations. GRD Powder and GRD Mix therefore fall under the residuary entry rather than the specific entry for non-alcoholic drinks and beverages.]]></description>
<category>VAT</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104603.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104603.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Secretary, DFS, Shri Sanjay Lohiya chairs review meeting on progress of Financial Inclusion Schemes with senior executives of Public Sector and Private Sector Banks</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75048</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75048</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Banks were urged to expand brick-and-mortar branches and banking correspondent coverage in unbanked villages, strengthen digital outreach, and implement end-to-end digital loan processing. Working-capital lending for micro-enterprises through UPI-linked credit lines and credit cards was highlighted. Banks were also directed to increase awareness of insurance claim eligibility, exercise care in claim-related grievance handling, and enrol new PMJJBY and PMSBY beneficiaries through the Jan Suraksha portal.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit under Inverted Duty Structure: Section 54(3)(ii) and Rule 89(5)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2532</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2532</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Refund of accumulated unutilised ITC under an inverted-duty structure depends on a causal link between higher-taxed input goods and lower-taxed output supplies. The test is not restricted to the principal raw material; higher-rated component inputs may support a claim despite parity between the principal input and output. Refund remains confined to credit on input goods, excluding input services and capital goods. Rule 89(5) separately determines the maximum refundable amount through its turnover-based formula, subject to statutory exclusions and prescribed filing and verification requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2532.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2532.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Detention of Goods in Transit: Consequences of Delayed Penalty Orders Under Section 129(3)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2531</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2531</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(3) imposes two mandatory sequential deadlines: a penalty notice must be issued within seven days of detention or seizure, and the penalty order must follow within seven days of service of that notice. The service date, rather than reply, valuation or intervening events, controls the latter period. Administrative difficulty cannot extend either deadline. The framework also requires a hearing, while inspection reporting timelines and administrative forms remain distinct and cannot dilute the statutory time limits.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2531.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2531.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ITC: Constitutional Validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and Supplier-Tax-Payment Condition for Input Tax Credit</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2530</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2530</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit under Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act is conditional upon actual payment of the tax charged on the supply to the Government. The condition is cumulative and is not replaced by the recipient's invoice, payment to the supplier, receipt of supply, return filing, or bona fides. Self-assessed credit is reversible with applicable interest where the supplier has not paid tax, but may be re-availed after subsequent supplier compliance. A bona fide-purchaser exception cannot be read into the actual-payment requirement, although any reversal or demand must rest on specific statutory facts, supporting material, and reasoned adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2530.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2530.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Omission of export-refund restriction requires pending integrated-tax refund claims to be assessed without the former eligibility bar.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104625</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104625</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving clause requires pending claims for refund of integrated tax paid on exports to be assessed without the former eligibility restriction. The Supreme Court treated the omission as applicable to proceedings pending on 08 October 2024, because no provision preserved the omitted sub-rule. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not save proceedings under an omitted rule, as it applies to repeal by a Central Act or Regulation rather than subordinate legislation. Independent refund conditions under the zero-rated supply, Section 54 and Rule 96 framework, including applicable procedures and limitation, continue to govern refund entitlement.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104625.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104625.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Substantive Right of Appeal and Onerous Pre-Deposit Conditions under the CGST Act</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2529</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2529</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Substituted CGST pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only orders does not govern an appeal arising from a formal show-cause notice issued before 1 October 2025, absent express retrospective language or necessary implication. The right of appeal and its applicable conditions vest when the lis commences; a filing-stage deposit that bars institution is substantive, not merely procedural. Admitted amounts remain payable, while a mandatory applicable deposit cannot ordinarily be waived or reduced by the Appellate Authority.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2529.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2529.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interim arrest protection cannot survive dismissal of an unmaintainable anticipatory-bail application; GST arrest requires communicated statutory authorisation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104624</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104624</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interim protection from arrest cannot survive dismissal of an anticipatory-bail application as not maintainable, because interim relief must remain ancillary to a pending substantive proceeding. Under the GST arrest framework, a summons does not itself make a person an accused or create a legally sustainable apprehension of arrest. Arrest requires the Commissioner's reasoned authorisation based on reasons to believe that a specified offence has been committed. That authorisation must be communicated before arrest, enabling the affected person to pursue anticipatory bail, judicial review, or other available remedies. Communication is a statutory procedural safeguard, not residual bail protection after dismissal.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104624.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104624.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended Limitation under GST: Fraud, Wilful Misstatement and Suppression Must Appear from the Notice</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2528</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2528</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 74 requires the notice itself to state the material facts supporting the precise statutory limb invoked and the causal nexus between that conduct and the alleged tax consequence. The phrase "by reason of" requires a pleaded connection; a tax discrepancy coupled with a conclusory allegation of fraud or suppression is insufficient. The notice should identify the relevant act, omission, representation, non-disclosure or device, explain why it is deliberate or wilful, and enable an effective response.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2528.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2528.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 87A rebate on Section 111A gains remains available where applicable law contains no express exclusion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104623</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104623</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 87A, as applicable to the relevant assessment year, allows a resident individual under the concessional regime to claim a rebate from income-tax on total income, including tax computed on qualifying short-term capital gains under section 111A, where the prescribed conditions are met. Section 111A fixes the special-rate computation for those gains but does not expressly exclude the resulting tax from the rebate base. Section 115BAC(1A) preserves Chapter XII special-rate computation and does not displace the separate rebate. By contrast, section 112A(6) expressly limits rebate against tax on specified long-term capital gains. Eligibility remains dependent on assessment-year-specific statutory text, resident status, applicable income limit, and any express restriction.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104623.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104623.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Authentication and forwarding of Export Declaration Forms (EDFs) at Non- EDI Customs locations</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71533</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[At Non-EDI Customs locations, physical Export Declaration Forms furnished by exporters must be received, authenticated by the specified authority, and forwarded to the Authorised Dealer named in the form. Authenticated forms should, where practicable, be transmitted electronically from a single official Government email address, with records maintained of forms authenticated and forwarded. Customs Commissioners must identify Non-EDI locations and ensure that this mechanism operates from 1 October 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transfer-pricing comparability requires justified turnover filters and availability-based related-party transaction thresholds to ensure reliable uncontrolled benchmarks.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104622</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104622</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transfer-pricing comparability under the transactional net margin method requires economically reliable uncontrolled benchmarks under Section 92C and Rule 10B. Turnover is not a standalone statutory bar, but material scale differences may justify excluding enterprises where brand value, intangibles, bargaining power, assets, risks or market conditions could affect margins. A turnover threshold must therefore be supported by transaction-specific comparability analysis rather than applied as a universal rule. Related-party transaction filters seek to reduce the influence of controlled dealings on comparable profitability. A 15% threshold is ordinarily appropriate where sufficient reliable comparables exist; a higher threshold requires a recor.....]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104622.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104622.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cabinet approves Commitment of Rs.10,000 Crore towards establishment of the SME Growth Fund for direct equity investments in Small and Medium Enterprises to create future champions</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75047</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75047</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Union Cabinet approval commits Rs.10,000 crore towards establishment of the SME Growth Fund as an Alternative Investment Fund framework for direct equity investment in small and medium enterprises. The initiative is intended to catalyse long-term, patient growth capital for SMEs and address the identified shortage of equity financing for enterprises beyond the early stage, where existing equity-support funds predominantly serve micro and early-stage businesses.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport  Logistics Authority</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75046</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75046</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Integrated Transport  Logistics Authority will function as a special purpose vehicle for integrated transport and logistics planning, research, technical project appraisal, monitoring, policy support and data analytics. It will prepare a long-term National Transport Master Plan, assess sectoral and annual plans for alignment and multimodal integration, technically appraise and monitor specified major infrastructure projects, and undertake impact assessments. It will also maintain a unified transport data repository and support logistics-policy review, capacity building, training, skilling, research and innovation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs custodianship for Ennore cargo appoints Viking Warehousing to hold import and export goods pending statutory clearance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104602</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104602</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Viking Warehousing CFS is appointed custodian of imported cargo landed at Kamarajar Port, Ennore, in addition to Chennai Port, and received at its CFS. Custody continues until the goods are cleared for home consumption, warehoused, or transhipped under the Customs Act, 1962. It is also appointed custodian of export cargo brought into its premises until export. The custodian must comply with the Customs Act, the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009, and applicable rules, regulations, and instructions. The appointment takes effect from 30 September 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104602.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104602.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interim pharmaceutical export clearance relief extends, while future clearances require full regulatory compliance after the extension period.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104601</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104601</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The interim facilitation measure for export clearance of drugs and pharmaceutical consignments is extended until 31 December 2026, subject to the previously prescribed conditions. After that date, export clearance must strictly comply with the applicable CDSCO Office Order. All other procedural requirements and conditions governing such export consignments remain unchanged. The extension takes effect immediately.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104601.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104601.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Integrated cargo security controls require CFSs to link vehicle access, tasking, Customs holds and independent gate-out verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104600</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104600</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Integrated technology-enabled cargo safety and security controls are mandatory for every Container Freight Station under JNCH, establishing connected digital controls over port transit, entry, cargo handling, Customs holds, surveillance and exit. Vehicles, personnel and cargo must be authenticated, digitally linked to valid system-generated tasks, and subject to real-time validation; oral instructions and paper records cannot override system blocks or active regulatory holds. Gate-out must independently reconcile identity, seals, releases, tasks and alerts. CFSs must operate a 24x7 control room, tamper-resistant audit trails, 180-day CCTV retention, transit tracking, escalation processes and cybersecurity safeguards. Compliance is phased ov.....]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104600.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104600.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Online Customs refund re-filing requires rectification of deficiencies; manual applications for returned claims will not be accepted.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104599</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104599</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Importers and exporters whose Customs refund applications were returned may re-file them online through ICEGATE after rectifying all communicated deficiencies. The online re-filing facility applies to applications returned under the Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995. Manual filing requests for returned refund applications will not be entertained. Applicants must fully cure the identified deficiencies before re-filing, as applications submitted without proper compliance may be rejected.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104599.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104599.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Import documentation for cosmetics, drugs and medical devices requires category-specific licences, labels, certificates and shelf-life verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104598</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104598</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Imports of cosmetics, drugs, medical devices, and medical-device raw materials or components must meet category-specific checklist requirements under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and applicable rules before out-of-charge clearance. Customs verification requires, as applicable, registration certificates, import licences or permissions, invoices, packing lists, country-of-origin certificates, storage-premises licences, batch quality certificates, and labels matching approved particulars. Cosmetics require declarations regarding hexachlorophene and animal testing, while drugs require residual shelf life exceeding 60%; consignments below that level require port-office referral. Medical devices with applicable shelf life must meet prescribe.....]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104598.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104598.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>The issue of portal only upload is getting resolved within three months.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17528</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17528</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Electronic service of GST notices and orders requires effective taxpayer access, rather than portal uploads that may not be visible in practice. Proposed enhancements to the GST Common Portal would display the dates on which orders were passed and uploaded, together with email and SMS notification triggers. The resulting chronology is intended to improve transparency concerning the issuance, uploading, and electronic communication of notices and orders, and to address disputes caused by delayed or insufficiently visible portal postings.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17528.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17528.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Disputed Classification Calls for Appeal, Not Writ Intervention</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17527</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17527</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST classification disputes involving tariff treatment, exemption eligibility and alleged excess beyond a show-cause notice ordinarily engage the statutory appellate remedy rather than direct writ review when the asserted jurisdictional defect cannot be separated from contested facts. Section 75(7) confines a final tax demand to the amount and grounds specified in the show-cause notice. Classification of animal-feed supplements between Heading 2309 and Heading 3004 depends on evidence such as product composition, principal use, labels, dosage, trade understanding and technical material.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17527.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17527.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IICA observed 3rd IICA CSR Day on Gandhi Jayanti with a Special Address by the DG  CEO to Participants of the IICA Certified CSR Professional Programme ahead of NCCSR 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75045</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75045</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[CSR is grounded in trusteeship and in companies' responsibilities to employees, communities and the environment, rather than shareholders alone. The framework includes the Unspent CSR Account, multi-year projects, certification of fund utilisation and impact assessment. CSR is intended to leverage corporate resources, technology and expertise, rather than merely supplement public expenditure. Needs-based project selection, community participation, need and social-impact assessment, implementing-agency capacity, resource pooling and technology-enabled monitoring are emphasised to move from compliance and spending towards evidence-based transformation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>No more improper invocation of section 16 (2) (c) of the CGST Act please.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17530</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17530</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act requires more than routine or mechanical invocation against purchasing dealers for supplier non-payment of tax. Its application should rest on circumstances warranting action and a demonstrated purchaser link to the supplier's default. Relevant evidence includes invoices, e-way bills, receipt and use of goods, and payment to suppliers. Retrospective registration cancellation does not automatically justify invocation. Proceedings against the selling dealer, clear show-cause particulars, natural justice, and reasoned orders recording facts and law are emphasised.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17530.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17530.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Rule 96(10) - Quietus for Pending Proceedings, a Refund Window for the Rest?</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17529</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17529</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 96(10)'s omission without a saving or sunset clause removes the restriction from all pending proceedings. The Supreme Court applied the principle that deletion without saving treats an omitted rule as if it had not existed; the General Clauses Act does not preserve proceedings under an omitted rule, and a GST Council recommendation of prospective operation is advisory. Pending export refund claims, demands, recovery actions, and appeals founded solely on the restriction therefore lack a surviving basis.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17529.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17529.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ARRESTS UNDER GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (PART-2)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17526</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17526</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST arrest authorisation permits the Commissioner, by order and upon reasons to believe, to empower an officer to arrest a person who has committed specified offences. Arrest extends to prescribed categories of tax evasion, wrongful availment or utilisation of input tax credit, and wrongful refunds where the relevant monetary thresholds are exceeded; it also covers the specified offence under clause (f) and repeat offending. Every arrest must comply with criminal-procedure requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17526.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17526.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>The Beneficiary May Be Unregistered, but Section 122(1A) Cannot Operate Retrospectively</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17525</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17525</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 122(1A) reaches an unregistered individual who retains the benefit of specified invoice or input-tax-credit contraventions and causes the transaction to be conducted. Personal liability requires proof of both retained benefit and control, direction, or causation; designation or managerial participation alone is insufficient. The mechanism does not create automatic vicarious liability for directors or employees. Effective from 01.01.2021, it applies prospectively according to the date of each underlying transaction, not the date of the show-cause notice or adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17525.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17525.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>SEAT AND VENUE OF THE ARBITRATION</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17524</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17524</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Arbitral seat supplies the juridical framework and identifies courts with supervisory jurisdiction, whereas venue is only the physical hearing location. Where no place is expressly designated as the seat, hearings at a place for the arbitrator's convenience do not establish that place as the juridical seat. Jurisdiction over an arbitral award challenge depends on the agreed or determined seat and competent-court factors, including the place of contractual performance. A prior arbitrator-appointment proceeding does not, by itself, make its location exclusively determinative.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17524.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17524.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary-limit compliance governs departmental GST appeals; Commissioner authorisation alone does not establish an exception or permit merits review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104597</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104597</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Monetary-limit compliance governs departmental GST appeals even where the Commissioner authorises an application under Section 112(3). Appeals below the prescribed threshold require the Revenue to specifically plead and establish a recognised exception under the applicable litigation-control framework. A bare assertion of the Commissioner's permission does not prove a residual exception without material demonstrating a case-specific recorded opinion. Maintainability must be determined before the underlying tax merits are considered. Where no recognised exception is established, a below-threshold departmental appeal is liable to dismissal at the admission stage, leaving the substantive tax dispute undecided.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104597.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104597.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electronic Cash Ledger balances do not end GST interest for prior periods until debit discharges delayed GSTR-3B liabilities.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104596</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104596</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST interest on delayed GSTR-3B liabilities remains payable on the cash component until the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited, even where sufficient funds were deposited and continuously available earlier. A ledger credit evidences deposit with the Government but does not discharge an identified tax liability; debit is required for payment. The proviso excluding continuously available cash-ledger balances from interest computation operates prospectively and does not apply to earlier periods. A show-cause notice causes no defect where the taxpayer received the demand computation, responded fully, and suffered no prejudice. Failure to provide a requested personal hearing breached statutory requirements, but remand was unnecessary absent surviving substantive prejudice. Interest demands remain subject to reconciliation and credit without double recovery.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104596.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104596.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Technical textile classification places laminated HDPE geomembrane under the lower GST rate from the effective date.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104595</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104595</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Laminated HDPE woven geomembrane used for waterproof pond lining, including Biofloc applications, is classified under tariff sub-heading 59111000 as a textile fabric for technical use. HDPE tapes and strips below 5 mm fall within Section XI, and their weaving produces textile fabric; lamination with plastic on both sides does not displace classification where the material serves a technical purpose under Chapter Note 8 to Chapter 59. The product attracted GST at 12 per cent up to 21 September 2025 and 5 per cent from 22 September 2025, following its placement under the relevant GST rate entries for tariff heading 5911.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104595.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104595.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST classification of outdoor playground and gym equipment distinguishes sports goods from physical-exercise equipment and bearings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104594</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104594</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Outdoor playground equipment, including qualifying spare parts, is classified under tariff item 95069990 as sports goods and taxable at 5%. Outdoor gym equipment and its qualifying spare parts are classified under tariff item 95069190 as equipment for general physical exercise and taxable at 18%. Parts solely or principally used with Chapter 95 articles generally follow the equipment classification. Ball and roller bearings remain separately classifiable under Heading 8482 because that specific tariff entry prevails over the general parts classification; their applicable tariff entry depends on their specifications, and they are taxable at 18%.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104594.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104594.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax payable threshold under Section 276CC prevents prosecution where liability is unestablished and non-filing lacks wilful intent.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104593</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104593</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tax payable is material to prosecution for failure to furnish a return under Section 276CC because the statutory exception depends on the assessee's tax liability. Where no assessment or other tax determination exists, the complaint does not allege tax payable, and a refund claim remains unaddressed, prosecution is misconceived. Wilful failure is also essential: the statutory presumption of culpable mental state may be rebutted through evidence showing no intent to evade tax. Evidence that property was jointly acquired, loan-financed, and that sale consideration was received by the spouse rebutted wilfulness. The convictions and sentences were set aside, and the assessee was acquitted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104593.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104593.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Separate speaking orders on reopening objections are mandatory; deciding them within reassessment invalidates jurisdiction and precludes revival of stale proceedings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104592</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104592</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment proceedings alleging bogus purchases require the Assessing Officer to decide objections to reopening through a separate speaking order and communicate it before completing reassessment. Incorporating the response to those objections only in the reassessment order does not satisfy this mandatory procedure and makes the assumption of jurisdiction unsustainable. Reassessments for the relevant assessment years were therefore quashed, while challenges to the alleged bogus-purchase additions became infructuous. Remand was declined because restoring jurisdictionally invalid proceedings would revive stale matters; the Revenue may proceed in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104592.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104592.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Appeal Filing Does Not Stay Tax Recovery, Though Further Recovery May Pause During First Appeal</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104591</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104591</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Filing a first appeal against a disputed tax demand does not automatically stay recovery. A stay requires valid reasons and a specific stay petition; where no petition was filed before recovery, the taxpayer cannot claim a stay as of right or obtain refund merely because the appeal remained pending. Refund of the amount already recovered was therefore declined. However, substantial recovery already made may justify protection against further coercive recovery until disposal of the first appeal.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104591.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104591.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Recorded satisfaction before Rule 8D application bars additional exempt-income expense disallowance and preserves voluntary taxpayer computation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104590</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104590</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Gains from share and securities sales retained their capital-gains character because no factual distinction from later assessment years justified recharacterisation as business income. Import-purchase payments to a Japanese non-resident associated enterprise remained free from withholding-tax disallowance, as identical later-year determinations governed the issue. Rule 8D could not support an additional section 14A administrative-expenditure disallowance unless the Assessing Officer examined the accounts, recorded dissatisfaction with the taxpayer's own disallowance, and identified expenditure related to exempt income. Formulaic application without these steps required deletion of the additional disallowance. The Revenue's appeal failed, while the taxpayer's appeal succeeded on section 14A.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104590.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104590.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customer-referral commission is business income, not fees for technical services, where no know-how is made available.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104589</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104589</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customer-referral commission, calculated as a fixed percentage of sales to referred customers, does not constitute fees for technical services under the India-Netherlands tax treaty or the Act where no technical or consultancy service, design, technology, or know-how is provided or made available for independent future use. Such commission is business income and is not taxable in India under the treaty in the absence of a permanent establishment. Beneficial treaty treatment must be given effect, and withholding-tax credit relating to interest on income-tax refunds must be granted in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104589.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104589.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cash-payment disallowance requires verified statutory conditions; unreliable civil-contractor books may instead support estimated business income.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104588</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104588</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cash-payment disallowance under section 40A(3) requires verified foundational facts: payments exceeding the prescribed limit to a particular payee on a particular day, supported by examination of books, vouchers and potential Rule 6DD exceptions. Assumptions about abnormal profit rates cannot replace those statutory conditions, so unsupported disallowances cannot be sustained. Where a civil contractor's books are unverifiable and unreliable, the first appellate authority's co-terminous powers permit rejection of books under section 145(3) and estimation of business income. Treating a potential profit result as independently making section 40A(3) inapplicable is legally unsound, but does not invalidate a properly supported book rejection and income estimation.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104588.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104588.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Berry Ratio rejected for jewellery manufacturing; receivables interest depends on customer-credit parity and binding book-profit directions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104587</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104587</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Berry ratio is unsuitable as a profit level indicator for a jewellery manufacturer that bears material, inventory, price and manufacturing risks, because value-added expenses exclude material costs, capital deployment and risks; total cost is the more reliable base. Sales transfer-pricing adjustments based on that ratio were deleted. Notional interest on associated-enterprise receivables requires parity analysis against unrelated customers: where identical 180-day, interest-free credit terms applied, the adjustment was deleted. For a later year, verification was required and any interest confined to delays beyond 180 days at six-month LIBOR plus verified bank spread. Transfer-pricing adjustments could not be included in book profit contrary to binding directions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104587.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104587.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Jurisdictional satisfaction for concealment penalty cannot be created later by substituting a distinct penal provision after assessment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104586</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Jurisdictional satisfaction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) must be recorded during assessment, including a direction to initiate penalty under that provision where deemed satisfaction is invoked. Initiation under section 271AAC, a distinct provision with separate conditions and consequences, cannot support a later notice or penalty under section 271(1)(c). A subsequent penalty order cannot amend the assessment order or retrospectively create foundational jurisdiction. The penalty was therefore deleted, while the quantum appeal remained for independent determination on merits.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104586.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104586.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Delayed trade receivables require independent arm's length benchmarking after the agreed credit period, using currency-appropriate interest rates.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104585</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104585</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Delayed trade receivables from an associated enterprise that remain unpaid beyond the agreed credit period are treated as a separate financing transaction and require independent arm's length benchmarking. Only the delay exceeding the actual arm's length credit period should attract interest, calculated in the receivable currency with a justified spread; LIBOR plus 200 basis points is prescribed for foreign-currency receivables. For ITES comparable selection, verification is required of the service-income and 25% related-party transaction filters. The turnover filter excludes companies with turnover above ten times or below one-tenth of the tested party's turnover.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104585.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104585.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Compulsorily convertible debentures remain debt before conversion, preventing transfer-pricing and interest-deduction disallowances on the stated facts.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104584</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104584</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsorily convertible debentures retain their debt character until actual conversion; compulsory conversion alone does not turn stipulated pre-conversion interest into an equity return. Their arm's-length interest cannot be determined at nil by replacing the contracted debt transaction with equity without defects in the comparable uncontrolled price analysis. Where working-capital adjustment already captures receivable effects and the same non-interest credit policy applies to unrelated customers, separate notional interest on associated-enterprise receivables duplicates the benchmarking adjustment. Pre-conversion CCD interest remains a contractual cost of borrowed capital, deductible absent findings of sham expenditure or non-business diversion; lender services are irrelevant.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104584.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104584.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Arm's length pricing of captive electricity follows the distribution licensee's supply rate, while penalty initiation challenges remain premature.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104583</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104583</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For specified domestic transactions, market value constitutes the arm's length price, with the special rule in the Explanation to section 80A(6) prevailing over the general provision. Regulated tariffs at which generating companies supply distribution licensees are not comparable uncontrolled prices because they are not negotiated in uncontrolled conditions. The cement unit's purchase rate from its distribution licensee was the more reliable internal comparable for captive electricity transfers; functional differences did not alter that comparison, and a mark-up on an average price was unsustainable. The transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted and the related deduction allowed. A challenge solely to initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104583.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104583.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pass-through associated enterprise purchases require no arm's length adjustment where credit notes align prices with the unrelated supplier.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104582</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104582</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transfer-pricing adjustment on raw-material purchases routed through a pass-through associated enterprise is not warranted where the unrelated foreign supplier directly supplies the goods and credit notes reduce the effective price to that supplier's price. An additional invoiced component used solely for customs-duty valuation does not justify an arm's length price adjustment in those circumstances. Compliance with the direction concerning operating revenue results in no further adjustment. The transfer-pricing adjustment on these purchases was deleted and the appeal allowed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104582.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104582.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Stock-in-trade transfer taxability follows possession and consideration, not later conveyance registration, limiting deemed-value provisions to the actual transfer year.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104581</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104581</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Taxability of business income from transfer of property held as stock-in-trade arises when the transferee receives possession in part performance of a written agreement for consideration and remains willing to perform. Receipt of the full consideration and delivery of possession complete the transfer; later registration of a conveyance incorporating the earlier agreement is procedural and does not create a fresh transaction. Accordingly, the deemed-consideration rule for stock-in-trade applies only in the previous year of the completed transfer, not in a later year solely because the conveyance was registered then. Income is attributable to the earlier assessment year, and the later-year addition does not survive.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104581.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104581.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax withholding on settlement compensation requires an identified statutory obligation before a disallowance can arise.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104580</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104580</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Faceless assessment permits Assessment Units to exercise Assessing Officer functions, including issuing scrutiny notices, without requiring the National Faceless Assessment Centre to issue them. ESOP discount reimbursed to a holding company constitutes employee compensation accruing over the vesting period where the liability has arisen and is reasonably estimable; later exercise, lapses or forfeitures require corresponding adjustments. A disallowance for failure to deduct tax from settlement compensation requires an identified statutory withholding obligation. Relinquishment of a right to sue does not itself establish payment for services, commission, brokerage, professional or technical services, or a non-compete arrangement; for non-resident payments, withholding depends on taxability in India.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104580.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104580.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Compulsorily convertible debentures remain debt until conversion, preventing transfer-pricing recharacterisation as equity without the GAAR procedure.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104579</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104579</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsorily convertible debentures remain debt until conversion, notwithstanding mandatory conversion, absence of principal repayment, regulatory classification or accounting treatment. Their interest must therefore be benchmarked as debt for arm's-length pricing; treating pre-conversion CCDs as equity and fixing interest at nil is unsustainable. Debt-equity recharacterisation is contemplated under Chapter X-A only where an arrangement is declared impermissible and the prescribed procedure is followed. As that procedure was not invoked, the transfer-pricing adjustment based on recharacterisation of unsecured CCDs as equity was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104579.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104579.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reciprocal plot exchanges: Consideration in kind prevents section 43CA valuation addition where no stamp-duty shortfall exists.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104578</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104578</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reciprocal transfers of developed plots under a pre-existing arrangement for consolidating fragmented ownership may constitute valid consideration in kind, notwithstanding deeds showing nil monetary consideration. Section 43CA applies only where consideration received or accrued is below stamp duty value. Where each transfer was matched by equivalent land transferred to the transferor's nominees and no shortfall against stamp duty value was found, the deeming fiction did not apply. The section 43CA addition was deleted because the conveyances represented reciprocal exchanges rather than understated consideration.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104578.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104578.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Project-import contract registration before importation determines Heading 98.01 eligibility, while Section 18A permits qualifying post-clearance Bill revisions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104577</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104577</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Project-import assessment under Heading 98.01 depends on registration of the relevant contract on or before importation and before clearance for home consumption; execution of a foreign-supplier purchase order is not importation. Accordingly, only goods imported after contract registration may receive project-import treatment, subject to all other regulatory conditions, while goods imported before registration do not qualify. Post-clearance revision of a qualifying Bill of Entry remains available under Section 18A notwithstanding the restriction in Section 149, but remains subject to prescribed requirements. Consequential refund processing may follow for qualifying post-registration consignments.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104577.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104577.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Clean slate protection prevents enforcement of pre-CIRP export obligations through Denied Entry List restrictions after resolution approval.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104576</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104576</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Pre-CIRP export-obligation defaults cannot support continued Denied Entry List restrictions after an approved, unchallenged resolution plan extinguishes the Government's operational-debt claim and attached performance obligations. Coercive administrative orders issued against the corporate debtor during the insolvency moratorium were void ab initio, and the impugned orders and listing were set aside, subject to fresh lawful action for an independent subsequent default. Inaction by the final decision-making authority constituted part of the cause of action, supporting territorial writ jurisdiction. Availability of an alternative remedy did not oust constitutional writ jurisdiction.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104576.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104576.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Resolution-plan feasibility fails where SEZ land conversion lacks consent and the Information Memorandum conceals regulatory uncertainty.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104575</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104575</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Material defects in the Information Memorandum, including overstated debt, omission of guarantor recovery, erroneous creditor ranking and undisclosed SEZ de-notification, distort voting, valuation and resolution-plan feasibility; commercial wisdom cannot cure those defects. A corporate guarantor that pays the financial creditor is subrogated to secured rights only to the amount paid and must be ranked as a secured financial creditor. The financial creditor's claim against the principal borrower must be recomputed from the finally adjudicated debt after crediting recovery from the guarantor. A plan requiring conversion or sub-leasing of SEZ leasehold land without statutory consent or completed approvals is neither feasible nor viable. The process must restart with a corrected Information Memorandum and fresh resolution invitation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104575.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104575.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST limitation turns on issuance of substantive notices and orders, not later electronic DRC summaries, preserving appellate review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104574</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104574</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST limitation under Section 74 turns on issuance of substantive show-cause notices and adjudication orders, while Rule 142 requires consequential electronic summaries in Forms GST DRC-01 and DRC-07. Later dates on those forms do not invalidate notices or Orders-in-Original issued within the applicable limitation period. Challenges involving fraud, suppression, supplier knowledge or collusion, input tax credit entitlement, and departmental evidence require statutory appellate scrutiny where no denial of hearing or patent jurisdictional defect exists. Merits remain open before the Appellate Authority.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104574.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104574.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Rule 138B authorisation and alternative appellate remedies limited the writ challenge to confiscation proceedings involving scrap-goods transport.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104573</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104573</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 138B permits physical verification of a conveyance by a proper officer authorised by the Commissioner; an authorisation-based challenge fails where the officer holds that authority and no jurisdictional defect is established. Writ jurisdiction despite an alternative statutory appeal remains confined to exceptional circumstances, including infringement of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to statutory validity. Where a fresh show-cause notice, personal hearing, consideration of the reply, and relevant detention, verification and registration-cancellation material are provided, complaints concerning relied-upon documents require appellate examination. The writ challenge to confiscation was dismissed, leaving the statutory appeal available.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104573.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104573.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate review.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104572</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104572</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Alternative statutory remedy under GST required disputes over reclassification of animal nutrition products from feed supplements to medicaments to be pursued through the appellate process. Alleged variance between the show cause notice and adjudication order, tariff classification, applicable notifications, and denial of hearing or cross-examination required factual examination and did not establish an apparent jurisdictional defect warranting writ intervention. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that avoidance of the prescribed pre-deposit was not a basis to bypass appeal, while permitting the statutory appeal and excluding the writ period for limitation.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104572.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104572.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Writ jurisdiction over CGST penalties requires a clear natural-justice breach; record-dependent challenges belong in statutory appeal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104571</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104571</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Writ jurisdiction against a common CGST penalty order is unavailable where alleged natural-justice breaches are unsupported by any specific denial of hearing or non-consideration of material. Challenges concerning limitation, the initiating officer's competence, and penalty liability require examination of the adjudication record and statutory provisions within the appellate process; the writ petitions were therefore not entertained. Pre-deposit relief available under an earlier High Court ruling may be claimed only where its factual conditions and stipulated requirements are satisfied.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104571.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104571.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Anticipatory bail under GST requires a communicated arrest-authorisation order; summons alone make a pre-arrest petition premature.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104570</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104570</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Anticipatory bail under the CGST Act requires a communicated order authorising arrest. Summons issued during an inquiry into alleged ineligible input tax credit do not, by themselves, make the recipient an accused or establish a legally sustainable apprehension of arrest. The statutory foundation for pre-arrest protection is an arrest-authorisation order made after the required reasons to believe; pending investigation, searches, summons, and a contingent risk of arrest cannot replace that requirement. Petitions founded only on summons were premature where no such order had been passed and communicated, without addressing the underlying allegations or investigation.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104570.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104570.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Proof of statutory breach limits strict-liability transit penalties where consignee-address errors are bona fide and goods match documents.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104569</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104569</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129 transit penalties may operate on a strict-liability basis, but still require proof of a statutory breach attracting the penalty. Where invoices, e-way bills and bilty documents matched the goods, the buyer was identifiable, and historical records supported use of its former address, a repeated consignee-address entry was treated as a bona fide documentary error. In the absence of evidence of a fictitious purchaser, diversion, clandestine unloading, value suppression, or tax evasion, the discrepancy did not establish a substantive transit violation. The transit penalty and consequential recovery were annulled, while tax lawfully payable on the supply remained unaffected.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104569.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104569.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Part B e-way bill exception protects initial intrastate movement to transporter premises from tax penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104568</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104568</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 138(3)'s third proviso permits Part B conveyance details to remain unfilled during the specified initial intrastate movement from a consignor's business premises to a transporter's premises for further transportation. The exception covers movement to a transporter's warehouse for consolidation before onward dispatch, rather than every short-distance journey. A permitted omission does not constitute an actual contravention attracting a Section 129 penalty, despite its overriding language. Appeals below the statutory monetary threshold may be admitted where a substantive issue concerning this exception and the resulting penalty warrants consideration on merits.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104568.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104568.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electronic Cash Ledger balances do not discharge GST return liabilities until debit, sustaining interest on delayed return filing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104567</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104567</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST interest on self-assessed return liabilities is discharged only when the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited towards the identified liability; a sufficient unappropriated cash balance does not stop interest until belated GSTR-3B filing. The later Rule 88B(1) proviso excluding amounts credited by the due date and continuously retained in that ledger operates prospectively, not for earlier periods. Notice proceedings remain valid where the taxpayer received the demand basis and computation, gave detailed replies, and established no actual prejudice. Denial of a requested personal hearing breached section 75(4), but did not require remand where the record was complete, the remaining issue was legal, and no lost substantive opportunity was identified. Interest demands were sustained, subject to reconciliation to prevent double recovery; substantive refund claims failed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104567.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104567.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the request.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104566</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104566</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Prescription of a timeframe for deciding applications to cancel or surrender duplicate PANs was referred to CBDT for initial consideration because no prior representation had stated the grounds for such a timeframe. The petitioner may submit a detailed representation; CBDT must decide it in accordance with law within eight weeks of receipt and communicate the decision.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104566.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104566.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Upper turnover filters in software transfer pricing comparability were upheld, defeating the Revenue's challenge to selected comparable companies.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104565</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104565</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Upper turnover filter of Rs. 200 crore for selecting software-development comparables in transfer-pricing analysis was treated as valid under precedent. The Revenue's challenge failed because the issue was already covered in favour of the taxpayer, resulting in dismissal of its appeal for the relevant assessment year.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104565.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104565.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST refund taxability: Audit-report disclosure alone does not convert unclaimed indirect-tax refunds into taxable income.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104564</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104564</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST refund disclosure in a tax audit report does not, by itself, establish taxable income. GST is a statutory levy collected and paid on behalf of the Government, and its refund represents a return of tax paid rather than income. Where refunded GST or IGST was not claimed as expenditure in the profit and loss account, it cannot be taxed solely because of its disclosure in the tax audit report. Allowability of the refund remains subject to examination of supporting records and applicable law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104564.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104564.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Omission without a saving clause removes the basis for penalties tied to Form 3CEB reporting of specified domestic transactions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104563</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104563</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Omission of the provision defining related-party purchases as specified domestic transactions, without a saving clause, removed the statutory foundation for penalties for failure to furnish Form 3CEB. Omission is distinguished from repeal: absent a saving provision, it does not preserve a right to initiate or continue proceedings based on the omitted provision. Penalties imposed for the relevant assessment years were therefore unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104563.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104563.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Conditional stay of transfer-pricing demand requires deposit and cooperation pending early disposal of the appeal process.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104562</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104562</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Recovery of the balance disputed tax demand arising from transfer-pricing adjustments was stayed pending appeal, conditional on deposit of 20% of the outstanding demand after excluding proportionate demand relating to services claimed to have been rendered to an associated enterprise. The stay operates for 180 days or until appeal disposal, whichever occurs first, subject to meeting the deposit condition and cooperating in early appeal disposal. No merits determination was made on the transfer-pricing additions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104562.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104562.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory draft assessment orders protect non-resident eligible assessees from jurisdictionally defective reassessments involving prejudicial variations.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104561</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104561</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 144C requires a draft assessment order before a final reassessment order imposes a prejudicial variation on a non-resident eligible assessee. Following the amendment to the definition of eligible assessee, non-residents other than companies are expressly covered. The draft procedure allows the assessee to accept the variation or seek directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel. Direct issuance of a final reassessment order without a draft order deprives the assessee of that statutory remedy. Such non-compliance is a jurisdictional defect rather than a curable procedural irregularity, rendering the final reassessment order invalid.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104561.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104561.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended limitation for wrongly exempted special additional duty sustained, while related interest and penalty were set aside.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104560</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104560</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Extended limitation for recovering wrongly exempted Special Additional Duty was sustained where, following amendment of the relevant Schedule, the exemption was unavailable and RMS-facilitated imports were cleared on the importer's declaration. The Special Additional Duty demand and its appropriation consequently remained valid. Interest under Section 28AA and penalty under Section 114A on the confirmed duty demand were unsustainable under affirmed precedent and subsequent consistent Tribunal decisions, and were set aside. The modified order retained duty recovery while removing interest and penalty, with consequential relief in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104560.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104560.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cross-segment derivatives manipulation triggered market-access restraints and preservation of alleged wrongful gains through interim directions pending investigation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104559</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104559</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cross-segment derivatives trading was treated prima facie as manipulative where connected companies moved futures prices through aggressive orders while holding larger, sentimentally opposite options positions and pre-positioned options orders. Artificial futures-price movements enabled favourable options execution, while cancelled, inexecutable futures orders added deceptive order-book depth. Repeated deliberate futures losses coupled with greater options gains were considered inconsistent with legitimate hedging, arbitrage, speculation, or rational profit-maximising conduct. Company directors responsible for business conduct faced a rebuttable presumption of vicarious liability and joint-and-several impounding of gains attributable to their companies. Interim directions restricted market access, preserved assets and gains, and required asset disclosures pending investigation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104559.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104559.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resolution plans.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104558</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104558</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Dismissal of employees through composite charge-sheet-cum-dismissal orders without a disciplinary inquiry breached natural justice, and the findings that termination was illegal remained undisturbed. Labour awards made before commencement of CIRP crystallised the employees' compensation entitlement and were not displaced by a subsequently approved resolution plan. Court-directed deposits securing those awards represented the employees' entitlement once the awards attained finality; failure to seek withdrawal before CIRP did not entitle new management to the funds. Employees could withdraw the deposited compensation and accrued interest, but had no further service-related claims.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104558.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104558.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Look Out Circulars require demonstrated flight risk or investigation obstruction and cannot persist solely during pending inquiries.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104557</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104557</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Look Out Circulars constitute coercive restraints on the right to travel abroad and require a continuing factual basis; a pending money-laundering investigation alone does not justify their routine continuation. Relevant considerations include compliance with summons, provision of requested material, prior travel without evasion, absence of court-imposed travel restrictions, and lack of evidence of abscondence, non-compliance or obstruction. Travel-related safeguards may require advance disclosure of travel particulars, a valid email address and full cooperation with the investigation to ensure continued availability.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104557.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104557.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Nexus between cash and proceeds of crime established through excise-evasion evidence and uncorroborated source claims.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104556</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104556</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Provisional attachment of cash as proceeds of crime requires a demonstrated nexus between the property and the scheduled offence. Evidence of a double-trip mechanism, supported by the truck driver's statement, showed excise-duty evasion through repeated use of transport documents. The warehouse owner did not independently corroborate the claimed bank withdrawal or receipts from traders; a cash book retained in the owner's custody lacked independent evidentiary value. The absence of bank records, investigative material, and increased declared income established the nexus between the seized cash and illicit country-liquor transactions, so the cash was treated as proceeds of crime and the attachment remained in force.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104556.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104556.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Known encumbrances in SARFAESI auctions remain payable before property can be delivered free of departmental attachments.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104555</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104555</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Known departmental attachments in a SARFAESI auction constitute encumbrances where entered in the encumbrance certificate and restrict alienation, transfer and further charges. Rules 9(6) to 9(10) require disclosure of known encumbrances and allow delivery free of them only after deposit of the amount required for discharge. Secured-creditor priority over Government dues governs recovery of secured debt but does not displace that mandatory sale procedure. Accordingly, a disclosed departmental attachment cannot be removed from the encumbrance certificate, nor can an auction purchaser avoid the associated dues, unless they are discharged. A secured creditor is not functus officio while any part of its debt remains unrecovered and enforcement continues.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104555.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104555.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vacated.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104554</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104554</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Possession of unused premises in a non-operational Special Economic Zone unit was separated from the parties' monetary claims to facilitate use by a viable entrepreneur. The applicable rent-control, Special Economic Zone, or public-premises eviction regime was treated as academic and left open. Claims for rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages were referred to arbitration, while the respondent was required to vacate after supervised removal of movables and evaluation of improvements.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104554.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104554.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>gst case law required S.16(2)(c) of GST can't be applied Mechanically to Deny ITC: PH HC issues 14 Guidelines for Dept.</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121162</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121162</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit eligibility is discussed in relation to the statutory condition that the supplier must pay tax. The central issue is whether that condition permits mechanical denial of credit to a recipient where supplier-side payment is not established. The available material also identifies a constitutional challenge to conditioning credit on supplier tax payment.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Supplier Default and the Buyer's ITC - Liability Must Be Established, Not Assumed</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17520</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17520</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST input tax credit is conditioned on the tax charged on a supply having been paid to the Government. A recipient's full payment of the invoice, including GST, settles the recipient-supplier obligation but does not by itself establish Government payment. Supplier non-payment, a retrospective registration cancellation, or an alert may justify inquiry, but cannot alone establish that the recipient's credit is inadmissible. The recipient must substantiate commercial reality through invoices, proof of receipt, transport and stock records, banking evidence, and other contemporaneous material, while the officer must evaluate that evidence through a transaction-specific and reasoned process.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17520.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17520.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Preserving Financial Stability in an Evolving World - Special Address by Shri Sanjay Malhotra, Governor, Reserve Bank of India, at the Fifth Kautilya Economic Conclave on October 3, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75044</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75044</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Financial stability is pursued by strengthening resilience rather than preventing every shock. The framework combines prudent regulation, risk-based supervision, stress testing, countercyclical macroprudential measures, targeted temporary liquidity assistance and resolution. Monetary policy remains directed to price stability, while financial-stability risks are addressed through regulatory, supervisory and macroprudential tools. System-wide resilience requires sound banks and NBFCs, reliable payment and technology infrastructure, robust data on interconnected exposures, scenario analysis, credible safety nets, and proactive proportionate oversight of cyber, model and third-party risks.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory compliance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104553</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104553</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Jai Research Foundation is approved as a Research Association for scientific research under section 45(4)(b), for the purposes of section 45(3)(a)(i) and Income-tax Rules 32 and 33. The approval applies for tax years 2026-2027 through 2030-2031, subject to compliance with rule 33. For each tax year in which donations are received, the association must prepare and deliver Form 15 by 31 May following that tax year. It must also provide each donor with a Form 16 certificate specifying the donation amount.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104553.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104553.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Import permits for non-insecticidal pesticide use now require Form IA applications, verified supporting records, and compliance with revised rules.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104552</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104552</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Import of insecticides included in the Schedule to the Insecticides Act for non-insecticidal use, including acrylonitrile, requires an import permit under the amended Insecticides Rules. Applications must be filed with the Registration Committee in Form IA, supported by information on manufacturing use, storage, regulatory approvals, import history and consumption. The Committee may verify the information, process complete applications within the prescribed timeframe, and issue permits generally valid for one year or for three years where the importer holds pesticide-registration certification for raw-material use. Pending portal applications are subject to the revised requirements. Incomplete applications may be rejected, and permits may be cancelled for incorrect information. Small unit packs of certified reference materials or reference standards are exempt.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104552.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104552.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Trade finance governance: revised Sub-Committee structure applies uniformly across Niryat Protsahan interventions under the Export Promotion Mission.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104551</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104551</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Trade Finance Sub-Committee composition is revised uniformly for all interventions under the Niryat Protsahan sub-scheme of the Export Promotion Mission. The committee is co-chaired by the Development Commissioner, Ministry of MSME, and the Additional Secretary for Trade Finance, Department of Commerce, with members representing trade finance, financial services, export promotion, internal finance, credit-guarantee and export-finance functions. The EPM-section Joint DGFT serves as convenor. Representatives of export credit insurance, banking, financial-services centres and factoring entities participate as invitees. The committee may co-opt additional participants and engage trade-finance experts or industry representatives for technical appraisal. All other existing provisions remain unchanged.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104551.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104551.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Non-resident deposit reporting shifts to CIMS Sankalan, requiring monthly NRD-CSR submissions through approved digital reporting channels.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104550</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104550</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[NRD-CSR (R012) reporting for banks maintaining non-resident deposit accounts is conducted through the CIMS Sankalan portal, replacing the earlier XBRL-based submission framework. Banks must report bank-wise consolidated data using the revised NRD-CSR format, maturity codes, record types and validation checks. Returns may be submitted through system-to-system integration, XML file upload, or a screen-based web form; access and reporting channels are managed through CIMS. Monthly returns must be submitted by the 10th day of the following month. The directions are issued under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, without affecting approvals required under other laws.]]></description>
<category>FEMA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104550.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104550.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Board-approved internal guidelines for Form A2 outward remittances may now be approved by delegated Board or management committees.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104549</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104549</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Authorised Dealer Category I banks and Category II entities must maintain internal guidelines for facilitating outward foreign exchange remittances through online or physical submission of Form A2 and related documents. Approval for those guidelines may now be given by the Board, a Board Committee, or a Management Committee where the Board has delegated that power. Existing requirements governing online or physical Form A2 submissions otherwise remain unchanged. The directions operate without affecting any separate permission or approval required under other applicable laws.]]></description>
<category>FEMA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104549.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104549.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules and Its Effect on Pending Integrated Tax Refund Proceedings</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2527</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2527</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Omission of Rule 96(10), effective from 08 October 2024 without a saving clause, applies to integrated-tax export-refund proceedings pending on that date. Such claims are assessed without the former restriction concerning specified notification benefits because Section 6 of the General Clauses Act does not preserve an omitted subordinate rule. The omission does not remove independent requirements for zero-rated supplies, refund eligibility, export documentation, returns, limitation, verification, or the applicable Rule 96 and Rule 89 procedures.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2527.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2527.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interim Protection from Arrest after Dismissal of Anticipatory Bail under the GST Arrest Framework</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2526</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2526</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interim protection from arrest is ancillary to a live anticipatory-bail proceeding and cannot subsist as a freestanding direction after an application is dismissed as not maintainable. Under the GST arrest framework, a summons does not by itself make the summoned person an accused or create a legally sustainable apprehension of arrest. Arrest depends upon the Commissioner's reasons to believe and an order authorising arrest. The Section 69 authorisation order must be communicated before arrest, enabling the affected person to pursue available remedies before personal liberty is curtailed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2526.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2526.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interplay of Sections 87A, 111A and 115BAC(1A) in Computing Rebate on Special-Rate Capital Gains</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2525</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2525</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 111A requires qualifying short-term capital gains to be taxed at the prescribed special rate, while section 87A operates as a rebate from income-tax computed on total income for an eligible resident individual under the applicable section 115BAC(1A) regime. Special-rate taxation governs computation and does not itself imply exclusion from the rebate. Unlike section 112A(6), section 111A contains no express provision reducing the rebate base by tax on qualifying gains. Eligibility depends on the statutory terms applicable for the relevant assessment year.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2525.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2525.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment limitation excludes reply time but preserves a finite statutory period for completing the pre-notice process.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104548</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104548</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under the former reassessment framework, time allowed or extended for an assessee's reply to a Section 148A(b) show-cause notice is excluded when computing the Section 149 limitation period. A notice is not invalid merely because the response period runs beyond the original limitation deadline. After that exclusion, where the remaining time does not exceed seven days, the sixth proviso provides a seven-day terminal period for issuing the Section 148A(d) order and consequential Section 148 notice. The exclusion does not create an open-ended period. Limitation must therefore be computed through the complete chronology of response periods, adjournments, extensions, reply-stage closure, and issuance of both the order and notice.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104548.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104548.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment approvals and limitation require separate statutory tests, with book-entry evidence independently supporting extended reopening periods.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104547</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104547</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment validity depends on distinct safeguards governing notice, limitation and approvals. Under section 149(1)(b), extended limitation may apply where books, documents or evidence reveal qualifying escaped income represented as an asset, relevant expenditure, or entries in books of account; these are alternative statutory categories. Digital and handwritten cash-book records may constitute books of account when supported by possession, control, corroboration and taxpayer nexus. Section 151 sanction requires genuine consideration of the reopening proposal and material, but need not contain elaborate reasons. Approval for a section 143(2) notice must precede its issuance, and contemporaneous electronic communication may establish timing despite a later postal receipt. Section 148B approval for the assessment order remains distinct from notice-stage and scrutiny-notice approvals.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104547.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104547.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 87A rebate may cover eligible short-term capital-gains tax under the earlier new-regime statutory framework.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104546</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104546</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 87A rebate was treated, for the pre-restriction period discussed, as available against income-tax on total income, including tax on short-term capital gains subject to special-rate taxation, where a resident individual met the new-regime eligibility conditions. The distinction between special-rate computation and rebate availability was central: the special-rate provision determined tax on qualifying gains but contained no express rebate exclusion. By contrast, the express exclusion for specified long-term capital gains supported the view that a similar restriction could not be implied for short-term gains. Later statutory language limiting the rebate was prospective and requires separate assessment where applicable.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104546.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104546.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Make-available requirement limits treaty taxation of management and support fees unless recipients gain independently usable technical capability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104545</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104545</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore DTAA confines fees for technical services to managerial, technical or consultancy services that are ancillary and subsidiary to royalty, make available technical knowledge enabling independent application, or involve development and transfer of a technical plan or design. Management and business-support services do not qualify merely because they are commercially valuable, specialised or recurring. The treaty inquiry turns on contractual deliverables, actual work performed, material transferred, and whether the recipient acquires autonomous technical capability; continuing dependence on the provider may evidence no transfer. Where more beneficial, the treaty limitation prevails over the broader domestic FTS definition, subject to treaty-residence and prescribed-document requirements.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104545.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104545.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-cognizance hearings under BNSS are mandatory for PMLA complaints when the cognizance stage is governed by BNSS.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104544</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104544</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 223(1) BNSS requires a proposed accused to be heard before cognizance of a PMLA complaint where the BNSS governs the cognizance stage. Section 44(1)(b) PMLA permits direct cognizance without committal but does not displace incorporated complaint safeguards; Sections 46 and 65 preserve criminal procedure unless inconsistent with the PMLA. Section 71 operates only upon inconsistency. Registration or listing of a complaint before BNSS commencement is administrative, not a pending inquiry under the saving clause, absent judicial application of mind. Non-compliance with the hearing requirement renders cognizance invalid and requires reconsideration from that stage; the hearing addresses prima facie cognizance, not trial merits.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104544.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104544.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended Limitation u/s 74 of the CGST Act: Foundational Facts for Fraud, Wilful Misstatement and Suppression</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2524</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2524</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 74 permits extended GST limitation only where tax short payment, erroneous refund, or wrongful input tax credit arose by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax. A mismatch or discrepancy alone is insufficient. The show cause notice must disclose foundational facts identifying the transaction, withheld or misstated material, deliberate conduct alleged, and its factual link to tax evasion. Audit objections or approaching limitation cannot replace the proper officer's independent satisfaction. Liability cannot be confirmed on grounds beyond those specified in the notice.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2524.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2524.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fiscal transparency requires partner-specific treaty analysis for UK partnership income, preventing automatic FTS treatment of legal services.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104543</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Fiscal transparency of a UK partnership requires Indian-source income to be tested partner by partner for treaty entitlement. Article 4(1)(b) of the India-UK DTAA limits protection to the share taxed as income of a UK resident, whether in the partnership's or partners' hands; it does not bar non-UK resident partners from invoking India's treaty with their own residence State. Domestic recognition of the partnership does not establish a single treaty residence. Treaty claims require residence certificates and prescribed information. Legal-professional services are not automatically fees for technical services merely because India-UK treaty relief is unavailable; their characterisation must satisfy domestic law and the applicable treaty's income article, including relevant fixed-base, permanent-establishment, or presence conditions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104543.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_104543.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
<item>
<title>TMI Updates - Newsletter dated: October 07, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/07/2026</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/07/2026</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Newsletter for tax updates and legal information]]></description>
<category>Daily Updates</category>
<category>Tax</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>