<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed?type=Schedules" rel="self" type="text/xml" />
        <title>Tax Updates - Daily Update</title>
        <link>https://www.taxtmi.com</link>
        <description>One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws in India</description>
        <category>Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax Services</category>
        <copyright>TaxTMI.Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@taxtmi.com</webMaster>
        <managingEditor>editor@taxtmi.com</managingEditor>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
<title>ITC wrongly reversed under Permanent reversal Category</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121176</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121176</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit mistakenly entered as a permanent reversal in GSTR-3B may be reclaimed when eligible through subsequent return reporting in Table 4(A)(5) and Table 4(D)(1). The correction should be supported by invoice-level reconciliation establishing that the entry was a clerical misclassification of temporary reversal. Permanent and temporary ITC reversals require separate reporting treatment, and any resulting Form DRC-01C notice should be addressed through a structured response explaining the reporting trail and procedural lapse.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tripura State Goods and Services Tax (Tenth Amendment) Act, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147343</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147343</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Post-supply discounts may be excluded from the value of supply only where the supplier issues a credit note and the recipient reverses attributable input tax credit. The credit-note mechanism expressly covers such discounts. Refund provisions additionally include unutilised input tax credit allowed under the relevant proviso, while the specified treatment of refunds under subsections (5) and (6) excludes claims for goods exported with payment of tax.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Special Economic Zones (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147377</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147377</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For funds established in an IFSC, a Developer's written confirmation of a provisional space offer to the fund management entity and the entity's lease deed are treated as the fund's corresponding documentation. For an IFSC Unit, the first final recognition, registration, licence or authorisation determines service commencement, notwithstanding later invalidity. Letter of Approval renewal considers employment, statutory violations and statutory-payment defaults. Aircraft and ship leasing arrangements may share authorised office space or manpower without separate space documentation where permitted.]]></description>
<category>SEZ</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>National Assessment Centre (NAC) Portal Access and effective utilisation by Trade and other Stakeholders</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71610</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71610</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[National Assessment Centre Portal provides a common digital platform under the Faceless Assessment framework for accessing Customs assessment information and reference material. Its searchable resources cover audit objections, rulings, legal decisions, classification, valuation, meeting minutes, advisories, alerts and trade-facilitation information. Importers, Customs Brokers and trade associations are encouraged to use the platform to support informed compliance, reduce divergent assessment practices, and improve transparency, predictability and certainty in Customs assessment.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transshipment Permission to M/s. Shreeji Translogistics Ltd., Kolkata to operate Import Bonded Trucking Services for Air Import cargo between Air Cargo Complex, Kolkata and all other Customs notified Indian Airports, ACCs, CFS and ICDs</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71611</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71611</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Import transshipment permission authorises bonded trucking of air import cargo from Air Cargo Complex, Kolkata to Customs-notified airports, Air Cargo Complexes, Container Freight Stations and Inland Container Depots through ECTS-sealed closed-body trucks. Bond amounts are debited on taking over cargo and credited upon delivery to destination Customs. The transshipper is responsible for shortages or pilferage and related value, interest, penalty and cess liabilities. Permission remains valid for one year or until bond expiry, subject to customs transit, cargo-handling and allied compliance requirements.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Optimization of Statutory Branch Auditors (SBAs) Costs and Acceleration of Centralized Audit Frameworks</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75104</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75104</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For FY 2026-27, audit remuneration is to remain at existing levels. Member banks are advised to accelerate a centralised audit framework to improve cost efficiency while retaining comprehensive risk oversight. Physical statutory branch audit coverage should be reduced to cover 50% of total business, apart from centralised treasury audits. Audit coverage must align with SEBI listing and disclosure requirements and RBI guidelines, supported by a Board-approved policy for the centralised audit roadmap.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Securities and Exchange Board of India (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2026.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147372</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147372</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[InvITs may issue depository receipts on their units subject to applicable requirements and the manner specified by the Board. Specified unitholder approvals require votes in favour representing at least seventy-five per cent of total votes cast, rather than approval by unitholders holding a prescribed value of units. For transaction-related approvals, votes cast by related parties are excluded. A sponsor exit in a multiple-sponsor InvIT requires an exit option for dissenting unitholders through purchase of their units.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Seeks to give effect to the first tranche of tariff concessions under India New Zealand Free Trade Agreement</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147373</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147373</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Preferential tariff concessions for goods imported into India from New Zealand apply through tariff-item-specific ceilings on basic customs duty, AIDC and, where applicable, Health Cess. Eligibility requires proof of New Zealand origin under applicable trade-agreement origin rules. Separate schedules prescribe CIF-value-based treatment for specified 750 ml container imports, Manuka honey and kiwi fruit. In-quota treatment for specified Manuka honey and albumins requires Directorate General of Foreign Trade allocation, electronic quota authorisation and electronic debit in the Indian Customs EDI System; Manuka honey also requires New Zealand certification.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>S.80M Deduction for dividend paid out of eligible dividends earned by companies- time available is up to 19.10.2026 for AY 2026-27. S.148 of ITA 2025 is also compared and wider possibilities explored</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17594</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17594</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[A domestic company may claim an inter-corporate dividend deduction for qualifying dividends received from domestic or foreign companies or business trusts, limited to dividends distributed within the prescribed period. Under the 2025 Act, distribution must be made at least one month before the return-filing due date. The corrected safe distribution date identified for an audit-case return due on 21 November 2026 is 20 October 2026. The same distributed dividend cannot generate a deduction in another tax or previous year.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17594.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17594.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Clarification on Legislative Developments concerning Government’s shareholding in IDBI</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75103</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75103</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Government shareholding in IDBI may be reduced or divested because the IDBI (Repeal) Act, 2003 contains no restriction on dilution of the Government's stake. A proposed amendment to limit dilution was rejected and not incorporated into the enacted law. Parliamentary statements cannot override statutory text, and promissory estoppel cannot be invoked on the basis of legislative debate statements to prevent dilution of Government shareholding. Successive Union Budget speeches also reflected a policy of transformation and strategic disinvestment of IDBI Bank.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interpretation of</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121175</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121175</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Concessional GST conditions distinguish a prohibition on taking input tax credit from a restriction on its utilisation. Credit that is not taken cannot enter the electronic credit ledger. Credit that is not utilised may be availed and retained but cannot be set off against tax on the specified service, while remaining available for other eligible taxable supplies. For specified rail services, credit on goods used in supplying the service may be used for taxable outward supplies of goods but not for tax on that service.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Penalty: Scope of "Any Person" under Section 122(1A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2574</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2574</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 122(1A) may impose personal GST penalty on a registered or unregistered person only for a covered invoice or input tax credit transaction. Liability requires cumulative proof that the individual retained an identifiable personal benefit and that the transaction was conducted at that person's instance. Directorship, employment, registration, signature authority, or association with the taxable entity neither independently establishes nor excludes liability. Proceedings require transaction-specific and person-specific allegations and findings. The provision operates prospectively for underlying acts or transactions occurring on or after 01.01.2021.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2574.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2574.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Forum shopping in bail proceedings led to fresh merits consideration after parallel remedies and adverse orders were withheld.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105134</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105134</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Forum shopping and suppression of material facts undermine the good faith required for discretionary bail jurisdiction. Pursuing parallel bail or release remedies while withholding rejection orders and refusal of interim release constitutes abuse of process. Urgent vacation listing of a pending bail petition, without a returnable date, Vacation Bench direction, or adequate notice to the opposing party, improperly seeks to steal a march and mislead the Court. The bail petition was revived for fresh consideration on merits, while the existing bail continued as interim bail pending further orders.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105134.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105134.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Condonation of delay in GST appeals restored merits review after illness and death disrupted the firm's affairs.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105133</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105133</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Serious illness and death of a proprietor's spouse, disrupting the firm's affairs, justified condonation of delay in statutory GST appeals. The High Court set aside appellate orders rejecting the appeals as time-barred and remitted them for determination on merits, based on the parties' concession and subject to payment of costs. Failure to pay costs forfeited the benefit of restoration, while all merits remained open before the appellate authority.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105133.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105133.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit limitation and effective notice requirements require quashing barred credit denial and remanding remaining GST issues.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105132</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105132</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit denied as time-barred under section 16(4) of the CGST Act was quashed because the issue was covered by a common order that had quashed the departmental determination. On the remaining adjudication issues, portal uploads of notices and reminders, without any response, did not provide an effective opportunity of hearing where statutory alternative service modes were available. The balance of the adjudication was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, conditional on agreed pre-deposit, reply filing and effective notice of personal hearing.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105132.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105132.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Effective GST notice service requires meaningful delivery, with defective portal-only notice leading to fresh adjudication after hearing.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105131</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105131</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Effective service of GST notices requires more than uploading statutory notices and hearing intimations under an additional-notices portal tab when the taxpayer receives no physical service through RPAD. SMS and email reminders do not cure the resulting lack of a meaningful opportunity to file explanations and supporting records, which breaches principles of natural justice. GST adjudication and the consequential Form GST DRC-07 may therefore be set aside for fresh consideration, subject to a 10% deposit of disputed tax. The taxpayer must be allowed to submit objections and documents, followed by a clear 14-day personal-hearing notice and a merits-based order.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105131.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105131.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IGST refunds for exports under manual shipping bills fall within Customs processing jurisdiction, requiring consideration under Rule 96(3).</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105130</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105130</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 96(3) assigns processing of IGST refunds on exported goods, including goods covered by manual shipping bills, to the Customs system or the proper Customs officer after receipt of information on a valid Form GSTR-3B return. Where the GST Department disclaims jurisdiction to sanction the refund, Customs cannot reject the claim by asserting that it falls within the GST Department's jurisdiction. Customs must process the claim and sanction any admissible IGST refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105130.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105130.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Excess output tax set-off can negate a tax shortfall, while vague notices and portal-based rejections breach natural justice.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105129</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105129</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Excess output tax paid beyond monthly liability may be set off against ineligible input tax credit where no overall tax short payment arises, avoiding an unnecessary payment-and-refund cycle. Refund of such excess output tax falls within the stated statutory exception and is not subject to unjust-enrichment scrutiny. Sales-return claims supported by valid credit and debit notes cannot be rejected solely for non-uploading on the GST portal where no mandatory upload requirement applied. Reasoned appellate orders must address material submissions, and demands cannot rest on grounds beyond the show cause notice. Interest for delayed return filing requires a notice identifying the relevant defaults, tax base and computation.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105129.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105129.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IGST Credit Set-Off: Aggregate reconciliation can eliminate alleged CGST and SGST input tax credit excesses.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105128</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105128</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST input tax credit may be assessed through aggregate reconciliation of IGST, CGST and SGST credits, including IGST paid on imports. Surplus IGST credit remaining after discharge of IGST liability can be used towards CGST and SGST liabilities, so an apparent CGST or SGST credit shortfall may not establish excess credit availment or tax short payment. GST adjudication must also afford a personal hearing, address taxpayer contentions and evidence, and give reasoned findings; orders issued without these safeguards risk breach of natural justice and non-application of mind.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105128.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105128.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fraud threshold for extended tax limitation curbs unsupported penalties, while consolidated notices across financial years remain permissible.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105127</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105127</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 74 requires foundational facts of fraud, wilful misstatement, or deliberate suppression with intent to evade tax; mechanical allegations cannot support extended limitation or penalty. Where credit entries were disclosed in statutory returns, the Section 74 demand and penalty were set aside, with any tax payable to be determined under the Section 73 framework through Section 75(2). A consolidated show cause notice spanning multiple financial years is permissible where the full demand is within limitation and no appellate prejudice results. Input tax credit discrepancies require factual verification and an opportunity to provide supporting evidence, requiring fresh adjudication. Interest follows tax ultimately determined payable and must be recomputed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105127.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105127.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Show-cause notice limits prevent input tax credit disallowance on an unalleged supplier tax-payment ground during adjudication.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105126</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105126</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 75(7) prevents confirmation of an input tax credit demand on a ground not set out in the show-cause notice. Where the notice alleged ineligibility only under section 16(2)(aa), which was inapplicable to the relevant period, adjudication could not instead rely on the separate condition under section 16(2)(c) that suppliers must pay tax to the Government. Mere reproduction of section 16(2)(c), without allegations or supporting facts identifying its breach, does not provide adequate notice. A provision protecting proceedings from formal defects cannot cure this substantive defect in the notice and adjudication process.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105126.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105126.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST refunds for cancelled air tickets remain available when passenger reimbursements defeat unjust enrichment and credit-note adjustment is unavailable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105125</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105125</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST refunds on cancelled air tickets may be available where ticket, passenger, invoice, refund voucher, credit note and BSP records establish that the airline refunded both fare and tax and retained no amount. On those facts, unjust enrichment does not bar the refund. Where credit notes cannot be adjusted because no output tax liability remains after cancellations, refund may be claimed in FORM GST RFD-01 as excess payment of tax. For B2C passenger-ticket transactions, input tax credit reversal is not applicable where no recipient credit is involved; a later proviso requiring reversal of credit attributable to credit notes does not apply to earlier periods. Refund claims should consequently be processed with applicable interest.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105125.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105125.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST short-payment interest and penalty apply when tax and interest remain unpaid within the show-cause notice period.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105124</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105124</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Delayed payment of a GST shortfall attracts statutory interest. Payment of tax after the prescribed period does not remove that liability. Where tax and interest remain unpaid within 30 days of a show-cause notice, the statutory penalty for short-payment demands applies. The discretionary penalty principle concerning failure to register as a dealer is distinguishable; interest and penalty were sustained.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105124.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105124.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit verification governs GSTR-2A mismatches, while unutilised reversals and sales-return credit notes avoid additional tax consequences.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105123</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105123</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit claimed in Form GSTR-3B is not denied merely because it is absent from Form GSTR-2A, which operated as a facilitative mechanism during the relevant period; the claimant must nevertheless prove statutory credit conditions, including supplier tax payment. Section 35(6) applies only to goods not accounted for, so verified reconciliation of e-way bills with invoices and ledger entries prevents a demand based on deemed outward supplies. Interest on wrongly availed credit arises only on utilisation, determined where the electronic credit ledger balance falls below that credit; pre-notice tax payment without interest bars notice and penalty. Sales-return credit notes can reduce taxable value and output tax liability subject to statutory conditions, and non-reporting in Form GSTR-1 is a compliance lapse rather than an independent tax liability.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105123.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105123.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST refund limitation exclusions preserve unregistered purchasers' claims after cancelled flat bookings, with no unjust-enrichment bar.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105122</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105122</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST refund limitation for an unregistered flat purchaser following cancellation of a construction-linked booking must exclude the period prescribed in Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax when computing the two-year period under section 54(1). The refund application was therefore within time. Where the developer deposited GST but refunded only the non-tax consideration, the purchaser may claim refund if the GST incidence was borne by the purchaser and the requirements of Statement 8 and Rule 89(2) are met. As the ultimate consumer, the purchaser is not barred by unjust enrichment. Refund was admissible with applicable interest after sixty days from the refund application.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105122.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105122.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST interest computation requires month-wise ledger verification, while pre-notice voluntary payment protects against penalty for inadvertent turnover reporting omissions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105121</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105121</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST interest remains payable despite voluntary tax payment before a show cause notice, but must be calculated month by month by identifying the tax liability, due date, actual payment date, and amount payable through the Electronic Cash Ledger under section 50 read with rule 88B. Interest calculated on the entire liability without verification of the electronic cash and credit ledgers requires fresh computation. Where omitted B2C turnover was accounted for, disclosed in the annual return, and fully paid before notice, section 73(5) applies; penalty under section 73(6) is unsustainable. The interest demand was remitted for recomputation and the penalty was set aside.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105121.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105121.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Expired e-way bills trigger GST detention penalties without proving tax-evasion intent when no timely extension or evidence supports delay.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105120</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105120</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(1) treats transportation of goods in contravention of GST requirements as sufficient for detention and penalty; proof of an intention to evade tax is not required because the penalty arises from breach of a civil obligation. Expired e-way bills may therefore attract penalty even for interstate stock transfers where a claimed vehicle breakdown lacks supporting evidence and no timely extension or amendment is sought. Invoices or the stock-transfer character of the movement do not replace a valid e-way bill, and exceptions requiring a valid e-way bill do not apply after expiry. Procedural objections concerning hearing, notices, or forms do not alter the position where a full opportunity to provide explanations and evidence is available before the final fact-finding authority.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105120.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105120.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Actual transport movement determines goods-detention liability; acknowledged notice service stands, while release payments await fresh adjudication.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105119</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105119</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129 liability for detained goods must be determined from the actual transport movement, including the route, destination and timing; a later e-way bill cannot retrospectively cure a contravention, and later invoices alone cannot establish onward movement. Conflicting interception accounts, incomplete carrier records and unavailable primary material require fresh, reasoned adjudication of the diversion defence. Acknowledged receipt of and response to FORM GST MOV-07 bars a later service objection, but does not remove the duty to consider the defence and grant statutory hearing. Payment to secure release does not conclude liability and must be adjusted or refunded following the fresh determination.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105119.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105119.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Post-interception transport documents require credible linkage to goods; unsupported transit claims cannot defeat undeclared-goods penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105118</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105118</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Post-interception invoices and bilties require reliable corroboration to establish that physically verified undeclared goods were covered by valid transport documents. Delayed documents were insufficient where they could not be linked to the goods, transaction parties did not acknowledge dealings or establish their identity and business credentials, and discrepancies remained unexplained; the penalty for transporting undeclared goods was therefore sustained. A transit-State defence based on asserted movement to an out-of-State destination also requires credible proof of the destination and underlying transactions. Mere passage through the transit State did not invalidate proceedings, and a precedent involving materially different facts was inapplicable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105118.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105118.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>E-way bill accuracy in diverted transit sales determines Section 129 penalties despite no independent proof of tax evasion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105117</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105117</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(1) of the CGST Act imposes civil penalty for substantive contraventions of transit movement-document requirements without requiring independent proof of intent to evade tax. Authorities must nevertheless assess the taxpayer's explanation and distinguish material discrepancies from minor or technical errors. A sale during transit may occur without prior physical receipt by an intermediary, but the continuing movement must be supported by a valid e-way bill accurately stating the actual origin and destination. E-way bills that do not cover the diverted route, falsely identify the dispatch point, or have expired may constitute substantive non-compliance. Payment through DRC-03 to secure release of goods does not conclusively admit liability or waive statutory appeal rights and may be credited against any liability.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105117.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105117.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Expired e-way bill transport attracts GST detention penalties without proof of any tax-evasion intent being required.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105116</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(1) of the GST Act applies where goods in transit are transported or stored contrary to the Act or Rules; proof of intent to evade tax is not a condition for detention or penalty because the provision addresses breach of a civil obligation and does not require mens rea. Transportation under e-way bills that had expired remained non-compliant where the asserted vehicle breakdown lacked supporting evidence and no extension or amendment was sought. Stock-transfer documentation and e-invoices did not cure the e-way bill lapse, while circular-based exceptions applied only to consignments accompanied by valid e-way bills. Penalties were sustained.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105116.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105116.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Meaningful hearing in detention penalty proceedings requires reasoned adjudication; payment for release does not waive statutory challenge.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105115</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105115</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penalty adjudication under section 129(3) requires a meaningful hearing under section 129(4) and a reasoned order addressing the taxpayer's explanation and consignment documents. Determining penalty the day after a notice allowed seven days to respond, using FORM GST MOV-09 containing unselected alternatives and drafting placeholders, fails those requirements. Payment through FORM GST DRC-03 to obtain release of detained goods neither cures incomplete adjudication nor waives the statutory challenge. Where FORM GST MOV-07 states an intelligible allegation, fresh adjudication should proceed within the existing notice's scope, with merits of the proposed penalty remaining open.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105115.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105115.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Compensation Cess ITC refunds require independent inverted-tax-structure eligibility; domestic leather supplies did not justify cash refunds.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105114</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105114</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Accumulated Compensation Cess ITC on coal used to manufacture leather products supplied domestically is refundable only where the statutory conditions for an inverted tax structure refund are independently met. Eligibility to avail the credit, including the absence of a blocked-credit restriction, does not itself establish entitlement to a cash refund. Although Compensation Cess credit is usable only against cess liabilities, its inability to be utilised against other liabilities creates no separate refund right. Clarifications and precedents concerning zero-rated or export supplies do not support domestic-supply refund claims. The order granting refund was set aside and the original refund rejections were restored.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105114.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105114.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Request-driven road restoration attracts reverse-charge GST, not governmental-function treatment or compensatory-damages status for business recipients.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105113</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105113</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Request-driven road restoration performed by the PWD for a business's pipeline operations is treated as a distinct service, with work-linked charges constituting consideration rather than compensatory damages. Although routine road maintenance serves a governmental function, targeted restoration for a commercial entity is not treated as a governmental-function non-supply or public-utility exempt service. Taxable Government services supplied to registered business entities fall under reverse charge; revenue neutrality or alleged dual tax incidence does not displace that liability without proof of forward-charge payment. Electronic GST notices and orders issued through the authenticated portal remain valid without a physical DIN where the notice identifies the case and no prejudice or natural-justice breach arises.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105113.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105113.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works are taxable Government services, with reverse charge liability and no public-function exemption.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105112</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105112</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid to a Public Works Department for repairing roads excavated for a commercial gas pipeline constitute consideration for a taxable service because the planned arrangement involved reciprocal obligations, not compensation for a wrongful act. Non-supply treatment and public-function exemptions do not apply where restoration is a targeted, fee-based service supplied to facilitate a business activity. The registered recipient remains liable under reverse charge for taxable Government services absent evidence of supplier tax payment; alleged revenue neutrality does not displace that liability. Electronic GST adjudication remains valid without a physical Document Identification Number where portal authentication establishes source and integrity and the notice adequately permits a response. The refund rejection was sustained and the appeal dismissed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105112.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105112.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 311 CrPC: Essential evidence may be summoned for a just decision without unnecessary costs imposed on the applicant.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105111</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105111</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 311 CrPC permits a court to summon, examine, recall or re-examine witnesses and requires that power to be exercised where evidence is essential to a just decision. The provision serves truth-finding and a fair trial rather than either party's advantage, even where a party failed to produce necessary evidence earlier. Where a complainant witness and supporting documents were necessary to resolve facts in issue and their proof was indispensable, the cost condition attached to allowing their production was set aside as unnecessary.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105111.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105111.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fresh documentary material limits reassessment beyond three years, while audit objections cannot support review of completed assessments.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105110</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105110</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment beyond three years requires books of account, documents or other evidence revealing income escapement; an audit objection alone is an opinion and cannot satisfy this condition or justify review of concluded scrutiny assessments. Re-examination of already disclosed material, including limited-scrutiny records, constitutes a change of opinion, rendering reassessment proceedings time-barred and without jurisdiction. Writ jurisdiction may be invoked on admitted material to challenge a reassessment notice lacking jurisdiction despite an alternative statutory remedy or completion of reassessment. Excise-duty refunds under an industrial incentive scheme for establishing a new undertaking are capital receipts, while goodwill arising on amalgamation qualifies as a depreciable business or commercial right.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105110.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105110.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Conditional release of fixed-deposit liens protects revenue through payment security and asset-preservation undertakings during tax-demand disputes.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105109</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105109</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Conditional release of a lien over provisionally attached fixed deposits can be granted where the outstanding revenue demand is adequately secured. A 20% deposit ordinarily supports a stay during appeal under the applicable CBDT circular; a 25% deposit, through a post-dated cheque, together with an undertaking not to transfer assets or create third-party rights, secured release of the lien. The Assessing Officer was required to lift the lien or recall the attachment and notify the bank once those conditions were met.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105109.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105109.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IGST valuation under DFIA excludes tariff-rate customs duty when the available exemption reduces chargeable duty to nil.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105108</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105108</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[DFIA exemption reducing Basic Customs Duty to nil means that no tariff-rate BCD is added to the value of imported polyester viscose fabrics for IGST computation. IGST valuation includes only customs duty chargeable on the imported goods, rather than a notional tariff duty that disregards an available exemption. Zero duty debit in the Bills of Entry, together with DFIA requirements to disclose import value and quantity rather than duty debit, supports treatment of BCD as nil. A precedent concerning interest on delayed IGST payment does not govern this valuation issue.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105108.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105108.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Consequential penalties for alleged import undervaluation fail when underlying demand proceedings are set aside entirely.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105107</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105107</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Consequential penalties imposed on Chartered Engineers for alleged undervaluation of imported second-hand printing machinery cannot continue where the underlying demand, interest and penalties against the principal parties have been set aside as legally unsustainable. Because the Engineers' penalties rested on the same allegation of undervaluation, setting aside the foundation proceedings removed the basis for those penalties. The penalties were set aside, with consequential relief available in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105107.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105107.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 138B safeguards bar reliance on untested third-party statements, while customs penalties require proven knowledge of confiscability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105106</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105106</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 138B safeguards govern the use of statements recorded under customs law in adjudication. Third-party statements cannot be relied upon against a noticee where their makers were not examined in chief, as the statutory conditions for their admission have not been met. Penalty for dealing with goods liable to confiscation also requires independent evidence that the person consciously dealt with the goods and knew, or had reason to believe, that they were liable to confiscation. Mere allegations that a person was an intended recipient of seized gold do not establish the required knowledge; penalties imposed without such proof are unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105106.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105106.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ICEGATE technical glitches supported interest refunds where delayed Bill of Entry filing alone caused denial under the waiver order.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105105</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105105</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest paid on import duty due to ICEGATE technical glitches was refundable despite Bills of Entry being filed after the cut-off under the Customs (Waiver of Interest) 3rd Order. The Tribunal applied a High Court ruling that an advisory acknowledged glitches continuing beyond the stipulated cut-off. Because the refund denials relied solely on late filing, the rejection orders were set aside and consequential relief was granted according to law.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105105.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105105.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Model-wise import cap monitoring cannot justify withholding used multifunction machines where all-India tracking is absent and full security is furnished.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105104</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105104</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Provisional release of used digital multifunction print and copying machines was considered where a model-wise import cap was allegedly breached. Without an all-India centralised mechanism to monitor the cap, withholding any part of consignments lacked a valid basis where security for the full consignments had been furnished through a provisional duty bond and bank guarantee. The applicable precedent on identical imports supported release against the stipulated security, and the orders permitting provisional release were sustained.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105104.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105104.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Prior hearing before PMLA cognizance is mandatory under BNSS for Enforcement Directorate complaints filed after its commencement.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105103</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105103</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The proviso to Section 223(1) of the BNSS requires an accused to be heard before cognizance is taken of an offence on a complaint. Enforcement Directorate complaints under the PMLA filed after the BNSS commenced are subject to the complaint procedure in Chapter XVI of the BNSS. Applying the repealed procedural code on authorities based on different facts was not appropriate. Cognizance taken without prior hearing was treated as illegal, so the cognizance and consequent rejection of discharge were set aside and the complaint restored for lawful proceedings.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105103.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105103.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Personal penalty for invoices without goods requires proven issuance or abetment and procedurally admissible witness statements.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105102</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 26(2) personal penalty for invoices issued without delivery of goods requires proof that the individual issued, or abetted the issue of, such invoices. Penalty against a director was unsustainable where the company received no show-cause notice, the director was not an authorised signatory, and no finding established issuance, connivance, or abetment. Purchasers' reversal of credit did not independently establish liability. Truck-owner statements could not be relied upon without compliance with the mandatory procedure for admitting statements under section 9D. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105102.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105102.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Pre-scheme tax payments linked to disclosed income must be adjusted under the Income Declaration Scheme.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105101</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105101</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Pre-scheme voluntary tax payments attributable to undisclosed income declared under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 may be credited against Scheme liability. Although section 187 requires full payment by the notified date, it does not prohibit adjustment of earlier self-assessment tax where the payment is linked to the declared income, recorded in the declaration, and supported by proof of payment. Relatable prepaid tax retains its character as tax and must be adjusted against tax, surcharge and penalty payable under the Scheme. Declarations were therefore to be treated as fully paid, with Form No. 4 to issue.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105101.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105101.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reasoned appellate adjudication remains mandatory even where an income-tax appeal proceeds ex parte after notice non-compliance.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105100</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105100</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 250(6) requires an appellate authority to determine the points in appeal on merits and record reasons for its decision. Non-compliance with hearing notices does not permit a cryptic ex parte affirmation of reassessment additions without addressing the issues, undertaking necessary enquiries, or obtaining assessment records. Although the assessee must comply with notices, any ex parte disposal must remain a reasoned decision on merits. The non-speaking appellate order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication after opportunity to both parties; continued non-compliance permits ex parte adjudication on merits.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105100.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105100.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Trust deed irrevocability prevents missing irrevocability or dissolution clauses from alone defeating charitable registration and donor-tax approval.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105099</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105099</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Public charitable trusts are irrevocable by operation of law unless the trust deed expressly reserves a power of revocation. Absence of an express irrevocability clause or a dissolution clause governing application of net assets therefore does not alone justify refusing renewal registration under section 12AB where voluntary charitable activities are undertaken. Denial of approval under section 80G solely because registration was refused cannot survive when the registration refusal is set aside. The registration and approval refusals were quashed, and registration was directed in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105099.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105099.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 54 capital-gains deposit requirement limits exemption for conjoined homes to timely utilised amounts, with consequential statutory interest.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105098</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105098</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unutilised capital gains claiming section 54 exemption must be deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme by the section 139(1) return-filing date where they have not been used for eligible residential investment. Exemption remains available only for gains utilised by that date; later payments do not qualify. This limitation applies even where two adjacent residential units are treated as one residential unit. The exemption was restricted to timely utilised gains, and interest under sections 234B and 234D was sustained as consequential and mandatory.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105098.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105098.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 263 revision requires valid scrutiny conversion and independent record-based satisfaction; section 28 interest remains enhanced compensation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105097</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105097</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 263 revision of a limited-scrutiny assessment requires conversion to complete scrutiny under applicable instructions before wider issues may be revised. Revision also requires the Principal Commissioner independently to call for and examine the assessment record and form the statutory opinion; an Assessing Officer's proposal responding to an audit objection does not itself meet that jurisdictional condition. Interest awarded on enhanced compensation under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is an accretion to land value and forms part of enhanced compensation, unlike interest for delayed payment under section 34. Later provisions taxing interest on receipt do not alter that character, and a debatable issue cannot render an assessment erroneous and prejudicial.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105097.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105097.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Burden of proving smuggling remains with Revenue for non-notified betel nuts; inconclusive origin evidence cannot sustain confiscation or penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105096</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105096</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[For non-notified betel nuts, the burden under Section 123 remains on Revenue to prove their smuggled character and cannot be discharged by assumptions, presumptions or uncorroborated statements. Transport documents identifying consignors in Mizoram and consignees in West Bengal do not establish cross-border movement. An expert opinion that samples merely appear to originate from the North-East, including the Myanmar region, is inconclusive of Myanmar origin. Without reliable proof of foreign origin and illicit importation, absolute confiscation of the goods and consequential penalties cannot be sustained.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105096.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105096.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory notice limitation invalidates delayed Customs Broker penalty proceedings, leaving alleged regulatory contraventions unexamined on merits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105095</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105095</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Proceedings against a Customs Broker under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations were invalid because the mandatory ninety-day period for issuing notice was breached. Where no date of receipt of the offence report was disclosed, the Department's knowledge of the alleged contraventions through its own customs notice, and at the latest their adjudication, constituted the relevant starting point. The regulatory notice was issued beyond the prescribed period even from the later event. The breach vitiated the proceedings, requiring the penalty order to be set aside; the merits of the alleged contraventions remained unexamined.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105095.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105095.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Composite car radio-DVD classification requires proof of principal function; indeterminacy places goods under the last equally meriting heading.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105094</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105094</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Composite car radio-DVD receivers combining radio reception and video reproduction are composite machines governed by the principal-function test under Note 3 to Section XVI. Revenue must establish a proposed tariff reclassification through cogent technical or trade evidence; promotional descriptions alone cannot prove that video reproduction is the principal function. Where no principal function can be determined, General Interpretative Rule 3(c) places the goods under the heading occurring last in numerical order among those equally meriting consideration. As video reproduction was not established as the principal function, classification under CTI 8527 29 00 prevailed and the linked customs-notification benefit followed.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105094.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105094.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Liquidation auction value governs stamp duty when transparent insolvency sales establish true market value for registration.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105093</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105093</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Stamp duty on a sale certificate issued following an insolvency liquidation e-auction is determined by the auction value where the process establishes the assets' true market value. The expression "Civil Court" in Article 16 extends to an auction conducted by a liquidator appointed under the insolvency framework, following independent valuation, reserve-price fixation, public e-auction and reporting to the Tribunal. An ASR-based valuation cannot displace the realised auction value without a valid basis to find intentional suppression or reduction of value to evade stamp duty. Registration is consequently to proceed on the auction value recorded in the liquidator's sale certificate.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105093.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105093.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Administrative write-down authority cannot be implied after a reconstruction scheme omits specific AT-1 bond powers.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105092</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105092</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Judicial review of the administrative write-down must assess legality against the facts and law existing when it occurred; subsequent financial developments cannot alter that inquiry. Omission from the final Reconstruction Scheme of an express AT-1 bond write-down provision meant that a general savings clause could not imply authority for the Administrator to alter the bonds. The Master Circular required conversion or write-down before the Scheme took effect, and the power at the point of non-viability lay with RBI rather than an Administrator exercising board powers. The post-scheme write-down was therefore ultra vires, was set aside, and coupon payments remained governed by the Information Memoranda.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105092.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105092.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retrospective Cancellation Calls for Inquiry, Not Automatic ITC Denial</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17593</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17593</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Retrospective cancellation of a supplier's GST registration warrants inquiry but does not alone prove invalid invoices, non-receipt of goods, non-payment of tax, or ITC ineligibility. Invoice-related eligibility must be assessed on the date of issuance and under the statutory conditions applicable to the relevant tax period. A show-cause notice must identify the actual ground for denying credit; cancellation alone cannot later be supplemented by unalleged claims of fictitious supply, non-receipt, or supplier tax default. Administrative scrutiny flags may prompt verification but cannot create a disqualification beyond statutory ITC conditions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17593.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17593.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>The AOs should take responsibility of Sec 154 cases so that these do not meet unfavourable judgements at the appellate stage [Sec 154 of ITA'61 - Sec 287 of ITA'25]</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17592</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17592</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rectification under section 154 requires an Assessing Officer to identify a self-evident mistake from the record through independent application of mind. The record includes materials and documents available when the order proposed for rectification was passed. Errors requiring prolonged reasoning, complicated arguments, or resolution of two reasonably possible views do not qualify. Accepted revenue audit objections must be addressed through the appropriate statutory mechanism, including revision or reassessment where applicable, with sufficient reasons for invoking section 154.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17592.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17592.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>SERVICE OF NOTICE ON THE KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL OF CORPORATE DEBTOR</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17591</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17591</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Service of a Section 8 demand notice upon the Key Managerial Personnel of a corporate debtor at its registered office, in their official capacity, may constitute deemed service on the corporate debtor. The statutory purpose is satisfied where the corporate debtor receives an effective opportunity to pay the operational debt or raise a dispute. A procedural irregularity in addressing the notice should not defeat substantive rights where the corporate debtor suffers no substantial prejudice.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17591.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17591.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Calling Road Restoration Compensation Does Not Defeat Reverse-Charge GST</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17590</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17590</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST treatment of road-restoration charges turns on the payment's legal character rather than its label. Charges paid under a prior arrangement granting excavation permission and requiring identified restoration may be consideration for a taxable service, unlike genuine compensation for damage or breach without reciprocal obligations. Government involvement and a connection with public roads do not alone establish non-supply or exemption. Reverse charge applies only after taxable supply and notification coverage are established, and any refund claim must show that tax was not legally payable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17590.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17590.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>An Excess First-Appeal Deposit Can Satisfy the GSTAT Pre-Deposit Requirement</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17589</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17589</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST appellate pre-deposit is calculated on the tax actually disputed before the Tribunal. An eligible earlier payment, verified, linked to the relevant demand and available for adjustment, may satisfy the aggregate first-appeal and Tribunal components without a fresh challan when it covers the recalculated requirement. A remanded component remains separate rather than being treated as deleted; deposits must be specifically allocated and cannot be reused. Recognition of an existing deposit remains subject to admitted-tax payment, applicable limits, demand mapping, filing fees and other appeal conditions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17589.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17589.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST invoice break up- Bank charges</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121174</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121174</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit on GST charged for foreign-exchange conversion, card fees, current-account charges, and operational bank charges is treated as available where the services are legitimate business overheads. Bank-issued tax documentation, including a consolidated GST tax invoice, is suggested for reconciling GST reflected in GSTR-2B. The adequacy of transaction advice displaying GST deducted, and the implications of claiming unmatched credit where no consolidated invoice is issued, remain unresolved.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Introduction of e-Invoicing Facility for Recipient Generated Self Invoices under Reverse Charge Mechanism for Domestic Supplies from Unregistered Persons (RCMDOM) and Import of Services (RCMIMP)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75102</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75102</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Eligible active registered recipients meeting the applicable aggregate annual turnover threshold may report recipient-generated self-invoices for specified reverse-charge domestic supplies from unregistered persons and imports of services. RCMDOM and RCMIMP must be selected as the relevant e-invoice supply types when reporting through an authorised Invoice Registration Portal. Submission and validation of prescribed invoice particulars would generate an Invoice Reference Number, subject to applicable GST provisions, notifications and e-invoice specifications.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>DFS Organises Workshop on Reservation Policy for Public Sector Banks, Public Sector Insurance Companies and Public Financial Institutions</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75101</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75101</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Implementation of the Government of India's Reservation Policy across public sector banks, public sector insurance companies, sectoral regulators and public financial institutions was addressed through capacity building to support uniform and effective application. Deliberations considered practical implementation issues, operational challenges and actionable measures for consistent policy application, alongside related welfare measures and interactive discussion of implementation questions.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Delivery challan for sales return</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121173</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121173</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Sales-return movement may be supported by a delivery challan when goods are transported back without issuing a tax invoice. The challan should contain identifying and transactional particulars, including party details, goods description, quantity, taxable value, place of supply for inter-State movement, and signature. Tax rate and tax amount are required only where transportation is for supply to the consignee; they are not required for a sales-return movement. The e-way bill should classify the transaction as inward sales return and refer to the delivery challan where applicable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Review of certain aspects of the Closing Auction Session, market timings and settlement methodology for derivatives contracts</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=71618</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Closing Auction Session procedures in the equity cash segment are revised to promote transparent price discovery and orderly functioning of the cash and derivatives segments. CAS will operate as a distinct ten-minute session from 3:30 p.m. to 3:40 p.m., with a system-driven random order-entry closure between 3:38 p.m. and 3:40 p.m. The CAS reference price is based on the volume-weighted average price of cash-segment trades during the final 15 minutes of CTS. CAS permits only limit and market orders; new iceberg and stop-loss orders are prohibited.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>APEDA Facilitates Export of 1.755 MT of Organic Palmyra Jaggery Powder from Tamil Nadu to Bulgaria</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75100</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75100</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[APEDA facilitated the maiden sea export of NPOP- and EU-certified organic Palmyra Jaggery Powder from Tamil Nadu to Bulgaria. The initiative seeks to diversify India's organic export basket, create market linkages for traditional Palmyra-based products, and improve producer access through export-oriented value chains. It covers organic cultivation and reports improved price realisation for participating farmers and the manufacturer compared with the domestic market. APEDA supports certified organic and value-added agricultural exports through market development, quality compliance, and overseas buyer linkages.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs clearance at Mandalgarh now covers unloading imported goods and loading export goods at the designated location.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105091</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105091</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Mandalgarh, Bhilwara, is added to the Rajasthan entry in the table to Notification No. 12/97-Customs (N.T.). The location is authorised for unloading imported goods and loading export goods, including any class of those goods. The amendment expands notified customs locations in Rajasthan and permits those import-unloading and export-loading operations at Mandalgarh.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105091.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105091.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Seeks to amend Notification No. 12/97-Customs (N.T.) dated the 2nd April, 1997 - Inland Container Depots for loading and unloading of goods</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147341</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147341</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs designation is extended to Mandalgarh, Bhilwara, Rajasthan, as item (xiii) in the Rajasthan entry under serial number 10. The location may be used for unloading imported goods and loading export goods, including any class of such goods, under the statutory framework for appointing customs places within inland container depot arrangements.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147362</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147362</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Listed entities whose non-convertible debt securities are listed on or after 14 October 2026 must list on stock exchange(s) every non-convertible debt security issued after the date of that listing. Regulation 62A(1) is substituted to impose this mandatory listing obligation, while regulation 62A(2) and 62A(3) are omitted. The revised requirement takes effect from publication in the Official Gazette on 14 October 2026.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Securities and Exchange Board of India (Real Estate Investment Trusts) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2026.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147361</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147361</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The amendments permit issuance of Depository Receipts on REIT units, subject to applicable requirements and Board-specified procedures. They revise specified unitholder approval requirements so that votes in favour must constitute at least seventy-five per cent of total votes cast, excluding votes cast by parties related to the transaction. In a multiple-sponsor REIT, a sponsor exit requires the outgoing or continuing sponsor, or their sponsor-group entities, to provide dissenting unitholders an exit option through purchase of their units.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147359</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147359</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Accredited investor eligibility is expanded through securities market exposure criteria and accreditation by a specified registered or regulated entity. Alternative eligibility is available for limited liability partnerships, body corporates and family trusts based on prescribed net worth or market exposure, while limited liability partnerships may qualify where each partner independently satisfies accreditation criteria. Investor disputes with an Alternative Investment Fund or its manager must proceed through specified mediation, conciliation and/or arbitration mechanisms. Managerial losses, damages and dispute-resolution expenses cannot be paid from Alternative Investment Fund property.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Commerce and Industry Minister Shri Piyush Goyal Launches National Strategic Trade Command Centre at Vanijya Bhawan</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75099</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75099</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The National Strategic Trade Command Centre provides an integrated analytics and visualisation platform consolidating trade data to monitor trade indicators, scheme performance, application pendency, processing timelines, regional trends and compliance-related parameters. It enables analysis across national trade performance, Regional Authorities, schemes, products, destination markets and individual applications, subject to role-based access permissions. Initial dashboards cover key trade-facilitation and regulatory processes, including SCOMET, export promotion schemes, certificates of origin, importer-exporter registration and restricted imports and exports.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Minister for Finance  Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman participates in the 114th meeting of the Development Committee Plenary of the World Bank in Bangkok, Thailand</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75098</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75098</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Private capital mobilisation is treated as essential to employment generation and productivity growth. Private enterprises, MSMEs and startups should remain central to job creation, with financing assessed by employment and productivity outcomes rather than volume. Guarantees, risk-mitigation instruments, local-currency financing and lower transaction costs are identified as means to expand affordable and predictable access to capital. Methodologies underlying governance indicators should be transparent, objective, evidence-based and responsive to diverse development experiences.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs officers detect 148.67 kg hydroponic weed from Bangkok at air cargo complex at IGI Airport</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75097</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75097</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[A Bangkok-origin air-cargo consignment declared as PU Tubes was examined on suspicion of mis-declaration. Plastic spools were found to contain concealed cavities holding polythene-wrapped packets of compacted green substance, preliminarily identified as suspected ganja/marijuana and described as hydroponic weed. The concealed substance, packaging and concealment material were seized under the NDPS Act, 1985. One person was arrested, and follow-up searches produced leads for continuing investigation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>DRI seizes around 6.2 kg foreign-origin gold; busts sophisticated gold smuggling modus operandi through unaccompanied baggage; three arrested</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75096</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75096</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign-origin gold smuggling through the unaccompanied baggage channel involved concealment of gold within hardware items and coordinated retrieval through warehouse personnel and intermediaries. Intelligence-led interception resulted in recovery and seizure of foreign-origin gold concealed in a floor spring, metal locks, a grease gun and a door closer. The arrangement used a trolley secured by a pre-decided number-lock combination, with a warehouse staff member, mediator and receiver allegedly involved in delivery of the concealed gold.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) U.P. Unit holds public hearing to address grievances of opium cultivators</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75095</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75095</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Opium cultivation licensing grievances were addressed through a public hearing where cultivators raised irrigation, climatic, single-plot licensing, and village-wise allocation concerns. Participants were informed of available legal provisions and administrative remedies. Requests for more licences and larger cultivation plots were considered, with policy matters recorded. A helpline is intended to assist cultivators during the 2026-27 licensing operation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) destroy 2.87 Hectares (7.08 Acres) of illicit cannabis (ganja) cultivation in wildlife sanctuary, District Dhule, Maharashtra</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75094</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75094</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Illicit cannabis cultivation was located by a joint DRI and CBN team across five stretches of remote, densely forested wildlife-sanctuary land near village Jamniapani, Shirpur, District Dhule, Maharashtra. The cultivation covered 2.87 hectares. Following requisite legal formalities, the cannabis crop was destroyed using a rotavator in the presence of Police and Forest Department officials. Investigation remains in progress.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Areca Nut, Gold and Silver</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147358</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147358</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tariff values are revised for edible oils, brass scrap, gold, silver and areca nuts under section 14(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Edible-oil and brass-scrap values are fixed per metric tonne, while gold and silver values apply per 10 grams and per kilogram respectively for specified forms and concessional categories, subject to stated product and import-mode exclusions. Areca nuts receive a tariff value per metric tonne. The revised values take effect on 16 October 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Seeks to amend Notification No. 77/2023–Customs (N.T.), dated the 20th October, 2023</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147357</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147357</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Duty drawback schedule entries in Chapter 71 are revised under the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017. The figure in column (4) for tariff item 711301 is replaced from 1851.99 to 1794.11. For tariff items 711302 and 711401, the corresponding figure is replaced from 29501.09 to 26859.02.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Appoint Common Adjudicating Authority</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147356</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147356</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication), Mumbai is appointed as the Common Adjudicating Authority to exercise the powers and duties of the Commissioner of Customs, NS-I Commissionerate, Mumbai Customs Zone-II, for adjudicating and disposing of specified customs show-cause notices. The appointment covers identified importers and exporters, with notice particulars and applicable order-in-original deadlines, including extensions where specified. It takes effect upon publication in the Official Gazette.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Amendments in the Employees’ Pension Scheme, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147355</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147355</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under the Code on Social Security, 2020, paragraph 4(2) of the Employees' Pension Scheme, 2026, applies the stated monthly wage limit in place of a centrally specified sum. The first proviso to paragraph 4(2) is amended by omitting the words "and the Central Government". The amendments take effect on 17th September 2026.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Seeks to amend Notification No. 06/2026-Central Excise, dated the 26th March, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147354</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=147354</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Central excise exemption table entries at serial numbers 1 and 2 are amended by substituting the per-litre rates in column (4). The rate for serial number 1 is substituted with "Rs. 2.5 per litre", and the rate for serial number 2 is substituted with "Rs. 8.5 per litre". These revised entries take effect from 16 October 2026.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>PMLA Act and Maintenance of records become more stringent [Sec 11 of ITA'61 - Sec 347 of ITA'25]</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17588</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17588</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[PMLA coverage extends to virtual digital asset exchanges, transfers, custody or administration, and related financial services, with virtual digital asset entities treated as reporting entities. Enhanced record-maintenance and due-diligence obligations require beneficial ownership identification, client-structure information, trustee and senior-management details, and registered-office information. Trusts and companies are subject to a ten per cent controlling-interest threshold for beneficial interest, while non-profit organisation clients require registration on the NITI Aayog DARPAN portal. Politically exposed persons are defined by reference to prominent foreign public functions.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17588.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17588.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>No Substitute for a Hearing – Gujarat HC Quashes Non-Speaking Section 74 Order for Denial of Personal Hearing</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17587</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17587</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act is mandatory where an adverse decision is contemplated, regardless of a "No" selection in FORM GST DRC-06. Where FORM GST DRC-01 does not contain hearing particulars, the proper officer must separately communicate the date, time, and venue; reminders showing "N.A." do not provide an effective hearing. Section 75(6) additionally requires a reasoned order addressing relevant facts, the taxpayer's reply, and supporting material. For ITC eligibility, the recipient must establish actual movement of goods and transaction genuineness beyond invoices and banking payments.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17587.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17587.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>A Clerical Error in the GST Payment Head Warrants Adjustment But Does Not Excuse The Unpaid Balance</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17586</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Wrong-head GST payments must be reconciled against the correct tax liability where IGST was mistakenly paid under CGST and SGST because of a clerical return-entry error. Established and available excess amounts may be adjusted to prevent duplicate recovery, but the adjustment extends only to that extent. A residual IGST shortfall remains recoverable in cash with applicable interest. Demand confirmation must remain within the grounds stated in the show-cause notice and must address the taxpayer's reconciliation through a reasoned adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17586.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17586.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>398 orders by all means undoubtedly is a very good score amongst various challenges.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17585</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17585</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transitional input tax credit omitted because the portal did not permit correction of an earlier return should be tested through verification rather than defeated solely by procedural lapse. Proper officers must examine relevant records and issue a reasoned determination. First appellate authorities must independently assess facts, identify issues, address defence grounds and give speaking orders. Clerical tax-head mismatches may permit CGST/SGST credit set-off against an IGST shortfall through the electronic credit ledger, with any remaining dues payable in cash with applicable interest.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17585.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17585.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST OFFENCES DO NOT SHIELD CHEATING AND FORGERY FROM POLICE INVESTIGATION</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17584</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17584</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Police investigation is not excluded merely because allegations arise from GST registration, invoicing, input tax credit claims, or tax compliance. Where an FIR contains distinct cheating and forgery offences, tax authorities and police may examine connected aspects under their respective legal powers. GST officers may scrutinise registrations, invoices, returns, credits and tax consequences, while police may investigate separate criminal ingredients. A disputed return, accounting error, or input tax credit claim does not itself establish penal offences; statutory ingredients and supporting evidence remain necessary.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17584.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/article_17584.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Financial Default Determination: Information Utility records and contemporaneous evidence support CIRP admission despite profitability disputes.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105090</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105090</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 7 admission turns on financial debt and default, determined summarily on a prima facie, preponderance-of-probabilities basis; exact claim quantification is reserved for CIRP verification. An authenticated Information Utility record has high evidentiary value, and unanswered authentication cannot later be met by bare denial; other contemporaneous documents may collectively prove default. Profitability or positive EBITDA does not displace default as the Code's trigger once statutory conditions are satisfied. A concluded determination validating an assignment may bar renewed challenge through issue estoppel, leaving the assignee able to apply as financial creditor. Section 62 appeals are confined to questions of law and cannot reweigh concurrent factual findings absent perversity, lack of evidence, ignored material evidence, or an erroneous legal standard.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105090.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105090.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Deemed withdrawal of GST best-judgment assessments follows delayed GSTR-3B filing when the requisite late fee is paid.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105089</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105089</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 62(2) of the GST law provides for deemed withdrawal of a best-judgment assessment when the requisite GSTR-3B return is filed. Delayed filing does not prevent that statutory benefit where the applicable late fee is also paid, following the amendment permitting condonation of delay in return filing. Once the assessment is deemed withdrawn, the tax demand and related dues under that assessment cannot be recovered, and recovery proceedings cannot be initiated or continued on its basis.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105089.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105089.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory GST liability prevails over works-contract terms, leaving VAT-to-GST reimbursement claims for resolution against employers.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105088</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105088</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST liability on works contracts remains governed exclusively by the applicable GST enactments, notwithstanding contractual arrangements between contractors and employers. Claims for reimbursement of the incremental tax burden arising from the VAT-to-GST transition are contractual claims against the concerned employer, rather than grounds to modify statutory assessment, recovery, return-filing, interest, or penalty processes. Challenges to assessment orders and statutory representations concerning recovery must proceed through available statutory remedies.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105088.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105088.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST Payment Timing: Cash Ledger credit ends interest accrual, while late post-notice payment attracts mandatory penalty.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105087</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105087</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tax paid before adjudication cannot be recovered again through a demand where the Government had already received the short-paid amount; the tax demand was therefore set aside. For delayed GST payment, interest accrues only until cash is credited to the Government account and Electronic Cash Ledger through Form GST PMT-06, not until the later ledger debit on return filing. Interest paid on a residual tax shortfall cannot be set off against separate interest liabilities for delayed monthly payments. Penalty immunity applies only where tax and interest are paid within thirty days of the show-cause notice; payment after that period attracts the prescribed minimum penalty.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105087.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105087.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retrospective GST interest liability confines delayed-payment interest to cash-ledger tax, requiring reassessment of credit-ledger interest refunds.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105086</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105086</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Retrospective operation of the substituted proviso to section 50(1) confines GST interest on delayed tax payment to the tax discharged through the electronic cash ledger, excluding the component paid by utilising input tax credit. Refund claims for interest paid on the credit-ledger component require verification of statutory conditions, payment and eligible quantum. Refund limitation cannot be introduced as a decisive appellate ground without notice and an effective opportunity to address the relevant date, computation and applicable exclusions. Limitation must be recomputed under section 54 after applying the notified exclusion of the specified COVID-19 period, followed by a hearing and consequential determination.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105086.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105086.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ISD-distributed input tax credit refunds remain available to SEZ units for their own zero-rated exports, subject to verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105085</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105085</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SEZ units may seek refund of eligible unutilised input tax credit distributed through an Input Service Distributor where the credit is attributable to their own zero-rated exports without payment of integrated tax. The supplier-specific procedure for direct SEZ supplies does not automatically bar such claims. Refund eligibility remains subject to verification, statutory conditions and quantification. A proposed exclusion for alleged prior supplier refund requires cogent documentary evidence, disclosure to the claimant and a reasonable opportunity to respond; supplier applications or unexplained back-office records alone do not establish double refund.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105085.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105085.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Anti-profiteering obligations apply to regulated Rail Neer transfer prices, requiring GST benefits to reach recipients despite price controls.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105084</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105084</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 171 requires suppliers of Rail Neer to pass GST rate-reduction benefits through commensurate reductions in transfer prices, even where maximum retail prices are railway-regulated and supplies are subsidised or complimentary. No exclusion applies to public-sector or governmental suppliers. Profiteering may be computed through a fair, case-specific comparison between pre-GST average base prices and post-GST transaction prices; no uniform formula or advance disclosure of the exact methodology is required where the supplier participated in the investigation. Investigation duration depends on circumstances rather than a one-year limit. Interest applies only prospectively from the interest provision's effective date, while penalty for continuing contraventions remains subject to statutory waiver upon timely deposit.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105084.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105084.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bill-to/Ship-to E-Way Bills permit direct dispatch where the person causing movement generates compliant transport documentation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105083</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105083</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Bill-to/Ship-to transactions permit an intermediate purchaser to instruct the original supplier to dispatch goods directly to the ultimate recipient, provided the supplies are genuine, documented and properly accounted for. Rule 138(2) allows the consignor or consignee causing movement to generate the e-way bill. Where e-invoices and e-way bills are generated before interception by the party arranging transport, the supplier's separate non-generation does not justify detention of goods. Compliance with these requirements makes detention and penalty for e-way bill non-compliance unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105083.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105083.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges constitute taxable Government services, triggering reverse charge and defeating claims of governmental-function exemption.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105082</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105082</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid by a business entity for permission to cut public roads for a pipeline constitute consideration for a taxable restoration service, not compensatory or liquidated damages. Targeted, request-driven restoration for commercial operations does not qualify for non-supply treatment or exemption available for governmental road functions, which concern community-wide maintenance. Where Government supplies that taxable service to a registered business entity, reverse charge applies to the recipient absent proof of tax paid under forward charge; revenue-neutrality claims do not override that liability. Electronically conducted GST adjudication remains valid where portal records authenticate the proceedings and the notice gives sufficient grounds without prejudice, despite no physical DIN.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105082.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105082.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cumulative GST appellate pre-deposit permits prior deposits against the same demand, eliminating duplicate payment where statutory thresholds are met.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105081</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105081</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST appellate pre-deposit is cumulative, calculated against the tax still disputed in the Tribunal appeal, rather than requiring a separate fresh payment after the first appeal. A deposit already held against the same demand may be apportioned between both appellate stages, including amounts paid through FORM GST DRC-03, because pre-deposit forms part of disputed tax rather than an independent levy. Requiring refund and redeposit of the same sum would be anomalous. Deposits connected with separate proceedings cannot be double counted. Where the existing deposit meets the aggregate requirement, it may be appropriated and electronically mapped to the disputed demand, with no further deposit required.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105081.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105081.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Revision for inadequate enquiry may stand where assessment fails to test present liability against future obligation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105080</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105080</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revisionary jurisdiction requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue and cannot merely replace one plausible view with another. Deduction for contributions to a Core Settlement Guarantee Fund required enquiry into whether payment created an accrued business liability or constituted a corpus for potential future defaults. Examination of genuineness and reasonableness alone was insufficient, given the fund's segregation, accumulated corpus and interest income. The ITAT sustained limited revision because the Assessing Officer had not undertaken requisite verification, directing fresh examination after hearing the assessee while leaving deductibility open.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105080.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105080.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Document Identification Number compliance renders TDS-default orders invalid where mandatory DIN requirements are breached and curative provision does not apply.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105079</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105079</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 292BA cures defects only in an assessment or assessment order and does not extend to a TDS-default order under section 201(1)/(1A). Although such an order may be treated as assessment-like in another statutory context, its legislative character as an order cannot be converted into an assessment order for this curative provision. Mandatory Document Identification Number requirements under the CBDT Circular therefore governed validity. Issuance without a DIN was a substantive legal breach rather than a technical defect, rendering the TDS-default order invalid and requiring its quashing along with the appellate order.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105079.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105079.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST assessment without verified turnover required fresh manual rectification review, while coercive recovery remained barred pending reconsideration.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105073</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105073</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST assessment was unsustainable where actual turnover had not been ascertained, an adjournment request was declined, and the taxpayer could not electronically file rectification because departmental creation of a temporary identification prevented portal access. Although personal-hearing notices were issued, the assessment followed soon after the final reminder, and no other works during the relevant period were asserted. The High Court directed the assessing authority to consider a fresh manual rectification application after hearing the taxpayer and barred coercive recovery until that decision.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105073.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105073.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Statutory limitation for GST detention penalties makes delayed orders jurisdictionally invalid despite an available appellate remedy.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105072</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105072</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(3) requires a detention penalty order to be passed within seven days of service of the notice issued after detention. Penalty orders concerning vehicles carrying scrap, made after that mandatory period, were barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. Pending proceedings concerning the supplier's registration did not suspend the statutory period because no competent court had stayed the detention proceedings. The availability of a statutory appeal did not preclude writ jurisdiction against jurisdictionally invalid orders. The time-barred orders were quashed, the detained vehicles were directed to be released without payment of alleged duty, and otherwise permissible proceedings against the supplier or recipient remained unaffected.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105072.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105072.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Retrospective input tax credit regularisation protects delayed returns filed by the prescribed cut-off from denial solely for lateness.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105071</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105071</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Input tax credit for invoices from the covered period is regularised under section 16(5), retrospectively effective from 1 July 2017, where the relevant returns were filed by 30 November 2021. Credit relating to July 2018 through March 2020, including financial year 2019-20 invoices, cannot be denied solely because returns were filed after the original deadline. Orders denying the credit were quashed and remitted for re-adjudication under section 16(5) after hearing, including reconsideration of Electronic Credit Ledger blocking. Further coercive action was restrained pending re-adjudication.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105071.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105071.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Nil valuation of unbilled head office services prevents GST demands based on proportionate allocation of common expenditure.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105070</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105070</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Head office services supplied to separately registered branches or depots constitute supplies between distinct persons even without consideration. Where no invoices are issued for those services, CBIC clarifications and Rule 28 require their value to be treated as nil; common expenditure cannot instead be proportionately allocated to create taxable value. Extended limitation under Section 74 requires facts establishing fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade tax, rather than mechanical allegations. Recorded expenditure and recipient eligibility for input tax credit may demonstrate revenue neutrality and, without more, do not establish those conditions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105070.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105070.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Anti-profiteering obligations survive business demerger, complaint withdrawal, and customized supply arrangements where rate-reduction benefits are not passed on.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105069</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105069</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Anti-profiteering liability following a GST rate reduction may apply despite a business demerger and a post-reduction registration where transactional evidence establishes the supplier's nexus to affected supplies. Investigation may extend beyond the original complaint and continue after its withdrawal because the regime serves consumer welfare. For customised lump-sum supplies, invoice-wise base-price comparison is permissible if rational, evidence-based and reconciled; the computation was accepted. Wilful retention need not be proved, although non-passing of the benefit must be established. The supplier was found to have breached the pass-through obligation and was subject to restitution and deposit directions; no penalty applied because the penal provision operated only prospectively.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105069.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105069.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST penalty provisions for fraudulent invoices remain under consideration despite an available statutory appeal mechanism.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105068</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105068</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The scope of "any person" in GST penalty provisions for fraudulent invoice and input tax credit transactions, their prospective operation, and the availability of writ jurisdiction despite a statutory appeal were identified as questions apparently covered by earlier High Court rulings. The matter was listed for the CGST Department to examine those rulings and state whether it accepts or challenges them.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105068.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105068.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory GST appeal pre-deposit raises conflict with IBC liquidation priorities when estate funds finance a statutory appeal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105067</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105067</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The interaction between the mandatory pre-deposit for a GST appeal and the IBC liquidation framework raises whether a corporate debtor in liquidation may be excused from making that deposit. The issue is whether using liquidation-estate funds for the pre-deposit conflicts with the statutory distribution waterfall governing creditors' claims. The High Court sought assistance on whether liquidation priorities affect the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for filing a GST appeal.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105067.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105067.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Omitted refund rule cannot sustain pending export refund proceedings without an express saving provision after its omission.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105066</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105066</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving or sunset clause prevented its continued application to pending export refund proceedings. Proceedings initiated under an omitted rule can continue only where an express saving provision or statutory legal fiction preserves them. Applying this principle, the High Court treated the Supreme Court precedent as applicable and quashed the adjudication notices and orders founded on Rule 96(10), allowing the writ petitions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105066.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105066.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Intermediary service classification excludes subcontractors providing contracted marketing and support services on their own account.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105065</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105065</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Intermediary-service classification turns on whether a supplier arranges or facilitates an identifiable main supply between other parties; a subcontractor supplying contracted services on its own account is excluded. Marketing, promotion, business-support and IT-enabled services provided independently on a principal-to-principal basis, without authority to bind the foreign principal or participate in third-party arrangements, qualify as export of services rather than intermediary services, supporting refund of unutilised input tax credit. Section 107(11) bars the first appellate authority from effectively remanding a refund matter after annulling the original order, while preserving the Tribunal's separate remand power.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105065.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105065.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary-limit compliance requires Revenue to prove a recognised exception; bare Commissioner approval cannot sustain a departmental penalty appeal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105064</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105064</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Departmental appeals disputing only a penalty are governed by the disputed penalty for monetary-limit purposes. Where the amount is below the prescribed limit, the Revenue must specifically identify and establish a recognised exception. Reliance on a residual exception requires material that the Commissioner considered the particular matter and recorded the requisite opinion; bare approval or authorisation to appeal is insufficient. Maintainability must be determined before merits, resulting in threshold dismissal where policy compliance is not shown.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105064.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105064.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Monetary-limit compliance in departmental GST appeals requires Revenue to prove a recognised exception beyond Commissioner authorisation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105063</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105063</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Departmental GST appeals involving disputed tax below the prescribed monetary limit require the Revenue to specifically plead and establish a recognised exception to the litigation-control policy. The threshold is calculated on aggregate disputed tax, excluding interest and penalty. Mere Commissioner authorisation does not establish the residual exception; the record must show a case-specific exercise of that power and its supporting basis. Where no applicable exception is proved, the appeal is not maintainable, may be dismissed at the threshold, and the underlying tax merits remain unexamined.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105063.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105063.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges constitute taxable services when requested for commercial pipeline activity, requiring reverse-charge GST from the business recipient.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105062</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105062</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid by a business entity for PWD-authorised road cutting and request-driven restoration constitute consideration for a taxable service because payment is directly linked to identified work and bilateral reciprocity. Such work is not a non-supply or exempt public-function service merely because routine road maintenance is governmental; it is performed for the entity's commercial activity. Government services supplied to registered business entities attract reverse charge where forward-charge payment is unproven, so refund of GST paid under reverse charge is unavailable. Electronic GST proceedings authenticated through the portal remain valid without a physical DIN where notice particulars enable a meaningful response and no prejudice arises.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105062.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105062.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges are taxable services, leaving commercial recipients liable under reverse charge without exemption or refund.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105061</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105061</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid for request-driven repair after excavation for commercial pipeline laying constitute consideration for a taxable service rather than compensatory damages. Routine public-road maintenance differs from targeted restoration supplied to a business entity; consequently, non-supply treatment and the governmental-services exemption do not apply, and tax under reverse charge remains payable. Prior refund sanctions in other jurisdictions and unsubstantiated double-taxation claims do not displace that mechanism. Electronic GST proceedings remain valid where portal records authenticate the application, notice, replies and orders, and the notice gave adequate factual and legal particulars without prejudice despite no physical DIN. The refund rejection and reverse-charge payment were sustained.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105061.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105061.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works attract reverse-charge GST, while portal-issued proceedings remain valid without physical DIN.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105060</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105060</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid for restoring public roads excavated for a commercial gas pipeline constitute consideration for a taxable service because the payment directly corresponds to requested restoration work. Targeted, fee-based restoration for a business entity differs from routine public road maintenance and does not qualify as non-supply or for public-function exemption treatment. GST is payable by the recipient under reverse charge, resulting in rejection of the refund claim. Electronically issued GST notices and orders authenticated through the official portal remain valid without a physical DIN where they clearly state the factual and legal basis and cause no prejudice.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105060.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105060.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Road restoration charges for business pipeline work attract reverse-charge GST, while portal-authenticated proceedings remain procedurally valid.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105059</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105059</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Road restoration charges paid to the PWD for restoring public roads cut for a business pipeline project constitute consideration for a taxable service, rather than compensatory payment or liquidated damages, because they arise from a requested and reciprocal restoration arrangement. Targeted restoration for a business entity is not treated as a general governmental or public-utility function eligible for non-supply treatment or exemption; the recipient remains liable under the reverse-charge mechanism and cannot obtain a related refund. Electronic GST proceedings remain valid without a physical Document Identification Number where portal authentication establishes the notice's source and integrity and the recipient suffers no prejudice. The refund claim was rejected.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105059.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105059.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cross-objections in income-tax appeals remain maintainable only for substantial questions of law arising from an adverse appellate order.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105058</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105058</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 260A(7) imports CPC appellate procedure into High Court income-tax appeals to the extent compatible with Section 260A. Because such appeals resemble second appeals and Order XLII applies Order XLI to them, Order XLI Rule 22 can permit cross-objections despite no express provision in Section 260A. A cross-objection remains limited to the adverse part of the Tribunal's order and must raise a substantial question of law. It cannot expand jurisdiction to factual issues or matters outside that order. Maintainability therefore depends on satisfying the statutory substantial-question-of-law requirement.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105058.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105058.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interest on delayed release of requisitioned cash includes statutory pre-assessment interest and restitutionary compensation for unlawful post-assessment retention.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105057</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105057</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 132B provides statutory simple interest on cash requisitioned under section 132A from the day after expiry of 120 days following requisition until completion of assessment. Where no tax liability is determined, the requisitioned cash must be released, with interest at one-half per cent for every month or part thereof during that pre-assessment period. Following assessment and discharge of any liability, seized cash must be released forthwith. Continued retention contrary to that requirement warrants restitutionary compensation for loss of use of money, irrespective of whether the tax department earned interest on the retained cash. Interest at six per cent per annum applies until actual release.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105057.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105057.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Penalty proceedings must remain suspended while an assessment appeal is pending before the Appellate Tribunal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105056</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105056</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 275(1)(a) requires penalty proceedings to remain in abeyance while an appeal against the relevant assessment order is pending before the Appellate Tribunal. A penalty order for under-reporting of income passed during that pendency is contrary to the statutory bar, regardless of whether the Assessing Officer had been informed of the appeal. The penalty order was quashed, with liberty to recommence penalty proceedings if the assessment appeal is decided against the assessee and the law permits.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105056.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105056.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Incomplete inventory records justify rejecting accounts, while profit estimation requires relevant comparable material and interest falls under other sources.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105055</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105055</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Incomplete inventory and stock records, coupled with absent individual ledgers and trial balance, justify rejection of accounts where they cannot disclose true profits. Following valid rejection, net-profit estimation must rest on relevant material rather than ad hoc rates; net-profit rates declared or earned in the five immediately preceding years and special-audit results guide recomputation, with interest excluded from turnover or gross receipts and no further expense deduction. Interest on bank or financial-institution deposits and delayed customer instalments is taxable as Income from Other Sources where the taxpayer does not conduct money-lending, financing, banking, or similar activities, irrespective of the funds' source.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105055.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105055.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Business-use evidence for director-linked vehicles permits partial expense disallowance, while contractual penal interest remains deductible.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105054</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105054</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Vehicle expenses and depreciation for cars registered in a director's name were restricted by 25% because no logbook or equivalent evidence excluded personal use and the company funded loan margin money; prior-year non-disallowance did not create res judicata in income-tax proceedings. Interest disallowance on borrowings was deleted because the interest-free advance's source and the loans' use, repayment and purpose had been explained, while the assessment lacked reasoned consideration. Rent paid for the director's residence remained deductible, with the accommodation taxable as a perquisite in the director's assessment. Penal interest for delayed loan instalments remained deductible as compensatory contractual expenditure, not an offence-related or legally prohibited payment.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105054.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105054.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>TDS credit timing: Compensation tax withholding must be claimed in the assessment year reflected in Form 26AS.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105053</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105053</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[TDS credit on compulsory-acquisition compensation is tied to the assessment year in which the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS. Tax deducted during FY 2022-23 and reflected for AY 2023-24 cannot be claimed for AY 2024-25. The procedure under section 155(20), Rule 134 and Form 71 does not alter that factual alignment; any entitlement for AY 2023-24 remains subject to independent adjudication.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105053.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105053.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mechanical reassessment sanction requires independent application of mind; a bare endorsement can invalidate the resulting reassessment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105052</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105052</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 151 sanction for reassessment requires meaningful, independent application of mind; a bare endorsement that notice is fit to issue on the Assessing Officer's recorded reasons is mechanical and invalid. This statutory safeguard applies even if sanction is administrative, because reasons must demonstrate the approving authority's consideration. Conflicting non-jurisdictional High Court views remain independently persuasive where related special leave petitions were summarily dismissed, since neither merger nor binding law under Article 141 follows. The assessee-favourable construction was applied, invalidating the sanction and quashing the reassessment while other grounds remained open.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105052.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105052.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional alignment; delayed associated-enterprise receivables need separate LIBOR-based benchmarking, while indirect forex gains fail export deduction.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105051</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105051</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Functional comparability for captive cost-plus ITeS providers requires alignment of scale, brand, intangibles, technology and service profile; materially dissimilar outsourcing, accounting or publishing businesses are excluded, while functionally similar ITeS providers may remain comparable. Companies outside the TPO search matrix cannot be rejected solely on that basis if they satisfy applicable filters, subject to functional, asset and risk analysis and annual-report verification. Delayed associated-enterprise receivables are international transactions requiring separate benchmarking after the comparable credit period, using LIBOR plus an appropriate spread. Foreign-exchange gains on reinstated trade payables and receivables lack the direct and proximate export nexus required for a section 10AA deduction.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105051.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105051.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Allotment-based property rights determine capital-gains holding periods and agreement-date stamp valuation for residential flat acquisitions</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105050</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105050</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Capital-gains holding period for a residential flat acquired under a builder's allotment letter runs from allotment rather than later registration, because the statutory test is whether the asset was held. A flat held beyond the applicable long-term period consequently qualifies for long-term capital-gains treatment, with indexation and section 54 relief available in accordance with law. For section 56(2)(vii)(b), an allotment letter containing the essential acquisition terms may constitute the relevant agreement. Where part consideration was paid through banking channels before allotment, stamp-duty value must be determined as on the agreement date, requiring valuation and recomputation on that basis.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105050.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105050.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Subcontract Profit Duplication Bars Separate Estimated Addition, While Unsupported Donations and Provident Fund Damages Remain Disallowable</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105049</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105049</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Profit on payments for subcontracted civil work cannot be separately estimated where the underlying contract receipts and profit have already been recorded, as this would duplicate disclosed profit; the related addition was deleted. A donation deduction remains disallowable where banking entries are unsupported by receipts. For delayed provident fund remittances, compensatory interest is deductible, whereas statutory damages for breach of payment obligations are penal and disallowable. The payment requires bifurcation between interest and damages, with the allowable interest component to be verified and permitted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105049.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105049.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended reassessment limitation in search cases requires asset-linked escaped income, invalidating additions based only on unexplained money or expenditure.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105048</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105048</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Extended reassessment beyond six years from a search requires material showing that escaped income is represented in the form of an asset. Additions for unexplained money and unexplained expenditure cannot support the extended period where they are not founded on an asset discovered during the search; a statement recorded during search does not, by itself, satisfy that statutory condition. On that basis, the reopening was invalid, the additions remained deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The assessee's cross-objection was infructuous.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105048.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105048.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Enhanced tolerance band under section 43CA applies retrospectively, deleting qualifying deemed-sale additions while disputed stamp valuation requires verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105047</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105047</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Enhanced 10% tolerance band under section 43CA is treated as a curative measure against hardship from deemed sale consideration and applies retrospectively; additions for two flat transfers whose valuation differences fell within that band were deleted. Where stamp-duty valuation is disputed for a transfer under section 43CA, the agreement-date value may apply if the earlier-agreement and banking-channel receipt conditions are met, and the section 50C valuation procedure must be considered. The remaining flat's proposed addition requires verification of the allotment material and statutory conditions, with a Valuation Officer reference where warranted, before redetermination.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105047.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105047.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Aircraft dry-lease rentals receive India-Ireland treaty protection where international-traffic rules apply and unnotified anti-abuse modifications cannot deny benefits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105046</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105046</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-Ireland DTAA protection for aircraft dry-lease rentals cannot be denied under the Multilateral Instrument's Principal Purpose Test unless Articles 6 and 7 have been specifically notified under section 90(1); valid tax residency, substantive commercial activity and cross-border leasing alone do not establish impermissible treaty shopping. Article 8(1) covers profits from operating or renting aircraft in international traffic, allocating the rentals solely to Ireland and prevailing over general business-profits provisions. Aircraft presence and ordinary inspection, maintenance and repossession rights do not create a fixed-place permanent establishment. Where ownership, return obligations and repossession rights remain with the lessor, dry leases are operating leases rather than interest-bearing finance leases.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105046.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105046.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Profit-element taxation of unrecorded property on-money limits assessment to income rather than gross cash payment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105045</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105045</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unrecorded cash paid as on-money for commercial property, where established on the evidentiary standard applicable to income-tax proceedings, is taxable only to the extent of the profit element embedded in the payment, since income tax applies to income rather than gross receipts. The assessable addition was confined to 10% of the unrecorded payment and made taxable at normal income-tax rates rather than under section 115BBE.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105045.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105045.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Excess managerial remuneration recovered by an employer may adjust later-year salary income without reopening the original salary assessment.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105044</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105044</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Excess managerial remuneration, previously taxed but later finally determined and actually recovered by the employer, may be adjusted against salary income in the year of recovery. The adjustment operates under section 15 as recognition of remuneration the employee was not entitled to retain, rather than as a deduction of expenditure under section 16. Annuality of assessment does not prevent recognition of the distinct subsequent recovery where its genuineness and repayment are undisputed. The original year's salary assessment and tax deduction remain undisturbed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105044.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105044.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>PBDIT benchmarking addresses depreciation-driven comparability distortions, requiring recomputation alongside working-capital adjustment and statutory loss set-off verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105043</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105043</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[PBDIT was treated as the appropriate profit level indicator for manufacturing transactions where materially higher fixed assets and depreciation distorted comparability under the operating-profit-to-operating-cost indicator and no reliable depreciation adjustment to comparables was feasible. The taxpayer's and comparables' margins were therefore to be recomputed on a PBDIT basis. A working-capital adjustment was required in benchmarking the international transactions. Set-off of brought-forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation was mandatory under the Act, subject to verification of the losses available, because the final assessment did not consider or give reasons for denying the claim.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105043.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105043.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Territorial jurisdiction in customs seizure disputes follows the place where seizure and provisional-release proceedings create the cause of action.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105042</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105042</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Territorial jurisdiction over customs seizure and provisional release depends on where the material cause of action arises. When the seizure of imported goods and release proceedings occur at ICD Dadri under the Customs Commissionerate at Noida, neither the Delhi location of CBIC or DRI headquarters nor disputes over classification or a Chartered Engineer's certificate creates jurisdiction in Delhi. Absence of any part of the cause of action is a jurisdictional defect, rather than a basis for applying forum conveniens, requiring recourse to the appropriate forum.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105042.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105042.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Knowledge of illegal import activity is essential before facilitation can support Customs Act penalties for undervaluation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105041</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105041</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs Act penalties for facilitating undervalued imports require evidence that the person procured or used an IEC, participated in unlawful import activity, or knew of it. Introducing an importer to a freight forwarder or providing contact details for a person able to arrange an IEC, without such evidence, does not establish a Customs Act violation or conspiracy. On that basis, penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were set aside, with consequential relief.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105041.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105041.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs transaction value rejection requires communicated reasonable doubt, while written reassessment acceptance preserves challenges to enhanced valuation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105040</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105040</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rejection of a declared customs transaction value requires recorded and communicated reasonable doubt and cannot rest solely on acceptance letters or uncorroborated contemporaneous-import data. Comparable-import valuation must establish relevant comparability factors, including quality, quantity, GSM and timing. Written acceptance of reassessment can dispense with a speaking order but does not waive the importer's statutory right to challenge the formation of opinion or the reassessment on merits. Enhanced valuation based only on acceptance letters and unsupported import data therefore lacks a lawful basis, and the importer may contest it despite written acceptance.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105040.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105040.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 123 presumption requires Customs to establish foreign origin before gold confiscation or penalties can follow.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105039</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105039</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 123 presumption for seized primary gold and gold cut-pieces shifts the burden to the ownership claimant only after Customs establishes that the goods are of foreign origin. Foreign markings alone do not prove smuggling and require supporting evidence of illegal importation. Where the seized gold lacks clear foreign markings and Customs produces no further evidence of foreign origin or smuggled character, the burden remains with Customs. The statutory presumption does not apply in those circumstances, and confiscation of the gold and consequential penalty were set aside.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105039.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105039.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Compulsory share buy-outs require prior oppression findings and current valuation, requiring reconsideration when statutory conditions are unmet.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105038</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105038</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Compulsory share buy-out orders in oppression and mismanagement proceedings require a prior finding that the alleged conduct falls within the statutory framework and satisfaction of the requisite conditions before remedial powers may be exercised. The share-purchase power is consequential rather than independent. A compulsory buy-out must also rest on the shares' current value at the determination date, or on a valuation closely proximate to that date. Failure to object to a valuation does not remove the Tribunal's duty to assess its genuineness and suitability. A valuation based on an earlier financial position was insufficient; the buy-out direction was quashed and fresh valuation and merits determination were required.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105038.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105038.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Operational Debt Proven by Tax Records and Ledger Balance Supports Insolvency Admission Despite Invoice PIN Error</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105037</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105037</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Operational debt and default arising from mustard-seed supplies were established through TDS deductions, GST input tax credit and ledger entries showing that goods were supplied and received. An incorrect PIN Code in invoices and e-way bills did not disprove delivery where those records otherwise matched the corporate debtor's registered-office address and no contemporaneous non-supply objection was raised; the non-supply defence was rejected. The corporate debtor's own ledger showed an outstanding balance above the insolvency threshold, so further reconciliation was unnecessary and admission of the insolvency application was upheld.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105037.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105037.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Deposited Funds: Withdrawal entitlement followed appeal party status, requiring remittance exclusively to the eligible appellant.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105036</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105036</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Withdrawal directions permitting an appellant to seek a court-deposited amount "subject to entitlement" must be read by reference to the party designations in the relevant civil appeal. The appellant in the Supreme Court appeal was therefore eligible to apply for release of the deposit, while the corporate debtor, as respondent and depositor, was not. The corporate debtor's withdrawal request was rejected, and the fixed-deposit amount was directed to be remitted to the appellant.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105036.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105036.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Challenge-mechanism compliance clarifications permitted, while unilateral revised resolution plans may be refused under creditors' commercial discretion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105035</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105035</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Resolution-plan modification after a challenge mechanism may address statutory compliance through clarifications authorised by the RFRP, where material queries are circulated to all applicants; unilateral revised bids may be declined under the CoC's commercial discretion. The applicable framework permits the Resolution Professional to place non-compliant plans before the CoC, provided compliance is achieved before approval. CoC-accepted statutory valuations are not reopened without material disparity or glaring illegality. A suspended director who is also a personal guarantor and unsuccessful applicant may challenge plan approval. Where the RFRP states that a special purpose company "may" be incorporated, it is optional; the successful consortium must retain over 50% shareholding until plan implementation. The approved plan remained undisturbed.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105035.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105035.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>FERA evidentiary proof: doubtful recovery, inadmissible loose sheets and uncorroborated retractions cannot sustain penalties or confiscation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105034</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105034</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[FERA contraventions require the Department to prove both the recovery of currency and its nexus with unauthorised foreign-exchange dealings. Unexamined panch witnesses and a doubtful panchnama left the alleged recovery unproved, while mere possession of currency did not displace a reasonable explanation based on bank and cash-book records. The statutory presumption for seized documents applies only to otherwise admissible material; loose sheets are not books of account and could not be relied upon. A retracted statement requires proof of voluntariness and independent corroboration. The burden to prove permission arises only after proof of an act requiring permission. Penalties and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>FEMA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105034.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105034.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Joint development service-tax treatment requires contractual analysis, while reverse-charge demands need proof of qualifying services and providers.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105033</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105033</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Joint development arrangements may involve non-monetary consideration where land or development rights are exchanged for flats, but taxability depends on contractual rights and obligations. Valuation follows only after identifying a taxable service, and comparable-flat values require genuine comparability and verification against duplicate taxation. Builder-developer construction before 1 July 2010 may qualify as self-service if applicable factual conditions are met; composite works contracts must be distinguished from pure construction services by contractual transfer of property in goods. An incorrect statutory citation does not alone invalidate an otherwise sustainable notice. Reverse-charge liability requires proof of qualifying GTA, security, manpower-supply or legal services. Extended limitation requires deliberate suppression with intent to evade tax.]]></description>
<category>Service Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105033.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105033.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Share pledge priority protects fresh refinancing security against claims based solely on personal guarantees and negative covenants.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105032</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105032</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Fresh pledge of specifically identified shares for a refinancing facility constitutes an independent proprietary security interest where earlier lender arrangements terminate upon discharge of its debt. A personal guarantee and a negative covenant create personal obligations only; without identification of the shares or an enforceable charge, they cannot defeat a later valid pledge. An unrecorded oral undertaking does not nullify subsequent facility and pledge arrangements, while breach of a valid undertaking normally gives rise to enforcement or contempt consequences. A guarantor cannot encumber a co-owner's interest in jointly held shares without express consent. Continuing claims over pledged shares lack justification once restored assets substantially satisfy the underlying loan claim.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105032.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105032.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>The cumulative exports (merchandise  services) during April-September 2026-27 are estimated at US$ 476.20 Billion, as compared to US$ 418.31 Billion in April-September 2025-26, an estimated growth of 13.84%.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75093</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=75093</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Combined trade estimates for April-September 2026-27 show exports of US$ 476.20 billion and imports of US$ 551.13 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of US$ 74.93 billion. Merchandise exports rose to US$ 259.89 billion, while merchandise imports reached US$ 437.53 billion. Estimated services exports were US$ 216.31 billion and services imports were US$ 113.60 billion, producing a services trade surplus of US$ 102.71 billion. September services figures are estimates, and specified earlier-period data were revised using quarterly balance-of-payments data.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Recovery of Corporate Debtor Premises and Proof of Tenancy, Lease or Licence Rights under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2573</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2573</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Where premises form part of the corporate debtor's assets, Sections 18 and 25 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 require the resolution professional to take custody, control, preservation and protection measures. An occupant resisting recovery must prove a subsisting tenancy, leasehold interest or enforceable licence through reliable evidence of the parties' intended relationship and its essential terms. Permission to stock goods or conduct limited business activity, prolonged occupation, and business or utility records do not independently create rights in the premises. Section 60(5)(c) supports insolvency jurisdiction over asset-recovery measures connected with the insolvency estate.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2573.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2573.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Service of GST Notices through the Common Portal: Statutory Validity and Practical Accessibility</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2572</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2572</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST portal service is a statutory method under Section 169, but its use in an ex parte demand proceeding depends on effective accessibility and a meaningful opportunity to reply and be heard. Rule 142 requires electronic DRC-01 and DRC-07 summaries to operate alongside the underlying show-cause notice and reasoned order. Portal placement, complete communication, e-mail transmission, technical reliability and proof of actual access may determine whether service is effective, whether waiver applies, and whether appellate limitation begins.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2572.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2572.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>TNMM Comparability: Operating Items, Search Matrix and Functional Analysis under Rule 10B</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2571</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2571</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[TNMM requires consistent computation of operating profit and operating cost for the tested party and comparables. A provision for doubtful debts connected with sales and trade receivables may be an operating expense, as may routine business levies; income-tax on profits remains excluded. A search matrix is a disciplined evidentiary tool, not a statutory bar to an out-of-matrix comparable. Inclusion requires proof of functional fit, filter satisfaction and reasons for its absence, while rejection cannot rest solely on matrix absence. FAR analysis, segmental reliability and material scale differences govern comparability.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2571.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2571.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Misreporting penalties for political-donation deductions require proof of a specified statutory default, not merely disallowance of the claim.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105078</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105078</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Disallowance of a political-donation deduction does not, without more, establish misreporting for enhanced penalty purposes. A valid misreporting charge requires proof that the taxpayer's conduct falls within a specified statutory category, such as suppression of facts, false entries, or an evidentially unsupported claim; an adverse finding on the deduction's genuineness is insufficient by itself. Transparent disclosure and a bona fide, fully supported explanation remain relevant to ordinary under-reporting. Notices and penalty orders must clearly distinguish under-reporting from misreporting, identify the precise allegation, and provide a meaningful opportunity to respond. Acceptance of a disallowance is not an admission of misreporting.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105078.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105078.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Conditional registration under section 12AB cannot suspend tax benefits pending litigation outside the statutory grant-and-cancellation framework.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105077</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105077</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 12AB requires the Commissioner to grant or reject charitable-registration applications after examining objects, genuineness of activities and material legal compliance. It does not create a category of registration whose effectiveness or tax benefits are suspended pending future litigation. Conditions may operate only where they reflect statutory requirements; prescribed forms, rules and administrative circulars cannot enlarge substantive powers. Post-registration concerns must be addressed through the separate cancellation process, including inquiry and hearing safeguards. A binding jurisdictional ruling remains applicable unless stayed, modified or reversed. The absence of an express irrevocability clause does not itself establish that a public charitable trust is revocable where no power of revocation is reserved.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105077.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105077.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Consent letters in customs reassessment waive speaking orders, not an importer's right to challenge enhanced valuation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105076</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105076</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Written acceptance of customs reassessment under Section 17(5) may dispense with a speaking order but does not, by itself, waive an importer's statutory right to challenge enhanced valuation. Consent letters must be read with the surrounding correspondence; payment under protest or requests for provisional clearance may negate unconditional acceptance. Transaction value remains the primary basis for valuation. Declared value may be rejected only where objectively grounded reasonable doubt exists under Rule 12, with written disclosure of grounds and a hearing on request. Any redetermination must follow the sequential valuation rules and rely on demonstrably comparable import data; generic NIDB references are insufficient. Challenges to an unchanged assessment must proceed through the statutory appeal route, not refund proceedings.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105076.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105076.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Validity of Gold Seizure under Section 110 and the Conditional Reverse Burden under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2570</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/tmi_notes?id=2570</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Gold seizure under Section 110 requires the proper officer to hold, before seizure, objectively supportable reasons to believe that goods are liable to confiscation. For gold, Section 123 shifts the burden of disproving smuggling only after a lawful seizure made in reasonable belief that the gold is smuggled. A general panchnama recital, foreign markings, high purity, or an uncorroborated retracted statement cannot alone establish that foundation. Reasons must exist contemporaneously and cannot be supplied retrospectively through later investigation.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notes</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2570.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/note_2570.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Assignment of leasehold rights may fall outside GST when the lessee completely divests its immovable-property interest.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105075</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105075</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:24:56 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST treatment of leasehold transfers depends on whether the transaction is an original grant, sub-lease, or complete assignment. An original grant of a lease, tenancy, easement or licence to occupy land is classified as a supply of services; qualifying long-term industrial leases may receive the stated exemption for upfront amounts. A complete assignment, where the outgoing lessee transfers the whole residual term, possession, building and associated benefits and retains no reversionary or possessory interest, may constitute transfer of an immovable-property interest rather than a taxable service. Consideration labels are not decisive; the deed, lessor consent, assignee substitution and future rent obligations determine characterisation. Sub-leases or continuing occupation arrangements remain susceptible to GST.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105075.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_105075.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
<item>
<title>TMI Updates - Newsletter dated: October 18, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/18/2026</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=10/18/2026</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Newsletter for tax updates and legal information]]></description>
<category>Daily Updates</category>
<category>Tax</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>