<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed?type=Duty+Drawback" rel="self" type="text/xml" />
        <title>Tax Updates - Daily Update</title>
        <link>https://www.taxtmi.com</link>
        <description>One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws in India</description>
        <category>Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax Services</category>
        <copyright>TaxTMI.Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <webMaster>webmaster@taxtmi.com</webMaster>
        <managingEditor>editor@taxtmi.com</managingEditor>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
<title>RBI MPC preferred wait-and-watch stance amid food and fuel inflation risks: Minutes</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74351</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74351</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Monetary policy calibration remained on hold because food and fuel inflation had not yet produced broad-based or persistent price pressures. The policy pause was supported by limited pass-through of supply-side shocks, contained core inflation and no clear demand-driven overheating. Recalibration depends on incoming evidence of persistent inflation, entrenched supply-side pressures, de-anchored expectations and the evolving growth-inflation dynamic. Geopolitical disruption, volatile oil prices, monsoon conditions and El Nin o-related agricultural risks remain material inflation risks.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Clear float glass imports become restricted, while qualifying higher-value imports and specified export-linked users remain exempt.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102848</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102848</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Imports of clear float glass, 4 mm to 12 mm, under ITC (HS) codes 70051090 and 70052990 move from the Free to Restricted category. Imports remain free where the CIF value is at least Rs.34,000 per MT, creating a minimum import price condition. Advance Authorisation holders, EOUs and SEZ units are exempt from this condition if the imported inputs are not sold in the Domestic Tariff Area. The minimum import price condition applies for one year from publication.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102848.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102848.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mutual fund registration applications move to consolidated Form A while retaining staged sponsor and AMC compliance requirements.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102847</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102847</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Mutual fund registration applications are consolidated into a revised single Form A, replacing the separate forms previously required for in-principle sponsor approval and final registration. The two-stage registration process continues: Stage I requires sponsor identification, ownership, financial strength, eligibility-route compliance, regulatory history, governance and policy disclosures; Stage II requires AMC particulars, governance, infrastructure, business planning, investor-service, technology, continuity, compliance and conflict-management information. Sponsors and AMCs must provide prescribed annexures, supporting records and self-certified declarations confirming that submitted information is true, complete and compliant. Existing conditions under the Master Circular remain unchanged.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102847.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102847.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Supersession Notification No. S.O.9/P.A.5/2017/S.112/2026, dated the 9th March, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146664</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146664</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Punjab SGST appellate filing timelines under section 112 are revised, with the earlier notification superseded subject to preservation of prior actions and omissions. Appeals against orders communicated before 1 May 2026 and applications concerning orders passed before 1 February 2026 may be filed before the Appellate Tribunal up to 31 July 2026. Later appeals remain subject to a three-month period from communication, while later applications remain subject to a six-month period from the order date. The revised timelines are deemed effective from 30 June 2026.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bihar Police arrests man over alleged exam irregularities</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74350</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74350</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Alleged examination irregularities involved suspected cheating through the receipt of an answer sheet by an examinee from personnel of a private firm conducting the examination. Police arrested a biometric operator following an investigation into his alleged involvement. His prior work with biometric firms and manpower supply agencies was examined in connection with clues concerning allegedly managed examination centres and a suspected solver gang.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>United Arab Emirates suspends trade with Iran after coming under renewed missile fire</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74349</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74349</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[UAE trade restrictions on Iran halted all trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions until further notice following reported ballistic-missile incidents and regional security escalation. The UAE assessed the missiles as directed at maritime traffic, while Iran denied launching them. The suspension disrupts the UAE's role as a major trade and re-export gateway for Iran and may increase Iran's economic isolation. Continuing threats to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz also create economic risk for the UAE's regional business, finance and tourism position.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>RBI minutes: Governor Malhotra awaits more clarity on inflation, opts for rate hold</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74348</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74348</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Monetary policy calibration remains contingent on clearer evidence that supply-side price shocks are becoming persistent, broad-based inflationary pressures. The policy rate was maintained unchanged amid uncertainty from higher energy costs, supply-chain disruption, an erratic monsoon and food, fuel and input-price risks. Policy tightening may be required if inflation becomes generalised, expectations become de-anchored, or inflation persists. A wait-and-watch approach was preferred pending clearer realised inflation, forecasts, weather effects and global conditions.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Instant Credit Card Application With JioFinance: Step-by-Step Guide</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74347</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74347</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Online credit card applications through the JioFinance app combine card comparison, eligibility checks, electronic verification, application submission and status tracking. Eligibility screening may occur without affecting the applicant's credit score, but approval remains subject to the issuing bank's criteria and internal policies. Aadhaar-based e-KYC or other accepted electronic verification may be used where applicable. Applicants should provide accurate Aadhaar, PAN and mobile details. Eligible approved applicants may receive a virtual card before physical-card delivery, subject to applicable terms and conditions.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Minister of Commerce  Industry Shri Piyush Goyal leaves for Singapore for 4th India-Singapore Ministerial Roundtable and 4th India-Singapore Business Roundtable</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74346</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74346</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-Singapore economic engagement is being advanced through ministerial and business roundtables under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. A multidisciplinary business delegation is undertaking business-to-business, government-to-business and institutional engagements focused on partnerships, investment, market access, technology collaboration and talent development. Agricultural trade cooperation includes promotion of Indian agri-food exports through a retail initiative. The engagement seeks to strengthen trade, investment, digitalisation, advanced manufacturing, skills development, green-economy cooperation and people-to-people ties.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IDFC FIRST Bank successfully accesses international debt capital markets with maiden US$500 million bond issuance</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74345</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74345</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[IDFC FIRST Bank accessed international debt capital markets through its IFSC Banking Unit at GIFT City by issuing inaugural fixed-rate senior notes with a three-year tenor, due in 2029. The notes were offered to investors outside the United States under the Regulation S format. The issuance followed an investment-grade long-term issuer credit rating with a stable outlook, diversifies the bank's funding sources, and creates an avenue for access to global capital markets in support of long-term growth.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Any attempt to defame CAS by manipulation will be dealt with sternly, warns Sebi's Pandey</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74344</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74344</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Closing auction session (CAS) improves transparency and reduces manipulation in end-of-trading price formation by pooling buy and sell orders during a designated closing window for auction-style matching. Manipulation intended to undermine CAS is subject to prompt and stringent action, supported by enhanced monitoring. Responsible use of artificial intelligence and machine learning requires tiered accountability and governance, including kill-switch, human-in-the-loop and data controls. Regulated entities remain responsible for privacy, security and integrity of investor data used by every AI tool they deploy.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Rupee falls 2 paise to settle at 95.76 against US dollar</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74343</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74343</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign exchange market movement saw the rupee depreciate marginally against the US dollar amid higher global crude oil prices, heightened West Asia tensions, a stronger dollar environment and weaker domestic equity markets. Central-bank intervention and foreign fund inflows provided support. Adequate foreign-exchange reserves and stronger-than-expected FCNR(B) scheme inflows were identified as factors limiting the scope for sharp depreciation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Launch of Indian Customs EDI System (ICES 1.5) for Import and Export and Commencing of operations at ICD Hirnoda, Jaipur, [INHDA6]</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70841</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70841</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Indian Customs EDI System (ICES 1.5) processing for import and export clearance commences at ICD Hirnoda, Jaipur (INHDA6), enabling computerized processing of Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills. M/s Hasti Petro Chemicals and Shipping Ltd. is appointed custodian and Customs Cargo Service Provider for the ICD and is permitted to commence operations after fulfilling applicable customs and cargo-area requirements. State Bank of India, SMS Highway Branch, is authorised to collect customs duty and make duty drawback and refund payments under the EDI system.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>QualityKiosk Establishes Hyderabad Engineering Hub to Advance AI Reliability, Agentic Engineering and AI Assurance for Global Enterprises</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74342</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74342</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[QualityKiosk Technologies has established a Hyderabad engineering hub to expand AI reliability engineering, AI assurance and agentic engineering capabilities. The centre supports engineering, marketing, branding, analyst-relations and advisory functions, while serving enterprise demand for AI reliability, product engineering, CloudOps and automation. It advances an AI reliability operating framework covering AI for reliability, reliability of AI, agentic engineering, shift-right engineering, frontier-system reliability, observability and platform-based delivery to promote governance, resilience, operational trust and assurance in AI-powered systems.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Automation of Refund Application and Processing for Courier Imports through Express Cargo Clearance System (ECCS)</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70839</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70839</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Refund claims for courier imports under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 are automated through the ECCS Refund Module. Authorised Couriers may electronically file claims with supporting records and bank details, receiving a Refund Request Number for processing and tracking. The Proper Officer must communicate deficiencies within 10 days, issue acknowledgements after rectification, and electronically communicate show-cause notices and speaking orders. Manual or ECCS filing is allowed until 30 September 2026; thereafter, fresh claims for Courier Bills of Entry must be filed through ECCS unless written approval permits manual filing.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Competition Commission of India (Commitment) Amendment Regulations, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146652</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146652</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The amendments extend the period under regulation 3(3) to 60 days and require defective commitment applications to be returned for curing and refiling within 10 working days. Original application fees may be adjusted upon refiling, while failure to cure defects makes the application invalid. The period for conclusion of commitment proceedings is extended to 180 days, excluding time taken for information, clarification, or responses; if not concluded within that period, the inquiry resumes. References are also updated to the CCI (General) Regulations, 2024.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Single Unified Multi-Purpose Electronic Bond in Customs - "Ekal Anubandh"</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70835</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA["Ekal Anubandh" enables importers and exporters to execute a Single All-India Multi-Purpose Electronic Bond through ICEGATE instead of separate transaction-wise customs bonds. Users may select applicable obligations, upload supporting documents, pay stamp duty electronically and complete Aadhaar-based e-signing through NeSL after customs approval. Electronic bank guarantees issued by NeSL-integrated banks may be linked to electronic or physical bonds after validation of the applicant, authorised signatory and bond reference. Manual bonds and guarantees remain an exceptional interim option for documented technical failures, subject to prior approval and limited permissions.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory filing of Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulation (SCMTR) - Discontinuation of supplementary IGM/EGM filings by 12th August 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70834</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=70834</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations compliance requires all cargo and manifest amendments to be filed through prescribed SCMTR amendment messages from 12 August 2026. Supplementary Import General Manifest and Export General Manifest filings are permanently disabled from that date. Sea carriers, shipping lines, agents, transshippers, terminal operators, custodians, freight forwarders, importers, exporters and customs brokers must ensure that their systems and processes are enabled for SCMTR-based filing and amendment.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Circulars</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ED raids SP leader Azam Khan's Trust and university in UP</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74341</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74341</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Money-laundering investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act led to searches of premises associated with the Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust, its university, linked companies, promoters and a chartered accountant. The inquiry concerns alleged diversion of government contract funds through private contractors and their alleged subsequent use, including for creating assets of the Trust and university. Separate planning-law issues concern allegations that most university buildings were constructed without approved plans.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Rupee rises 1 paisa to 95.73 against US dollar in early trade</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74340</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74340</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign exchange market conditions reflected a marginal strengthening of the rupee against the US dollar in early trading, supported by reported Reserve Bank of India intervention, a softer dollar index and foreign institutional equity inflows. Higher global crude oil prices, West Asia tensions and oil-company demand for dollars continued to exert pressure, resulting in a range-bound trading environment.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Amendment in Import Policy and Policy condition of Clear Float Glass (4 mm- 12 mm), falling under ITC (HS) Codes 70051090 and 70052990, covered under Chapter 70 of Schedule - I (Import Policy) of ITC (HS) 2022.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146644</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/notifications?id=146644</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Import policy for clear float glass classified under ITC (HS) codes 70051090 and 70052990 is changed from Free to Restricted. Imports remain free where the CIF value is Rs. 34,000 or more per metric tonne. The minimum import price condition is inapplicable to Advance Authorisation holders, Export Oriented Units and Special Economic Zone units if imported inputs are not sold into the Domestic Tariff Area, and applies for one year from publication.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Notifications</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves acquisition of 23% equity shareholding of TM International Logistics by Tata Steel Ltd</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74339</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74339</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition approval has been granted for Tata Steel Ltd.'s acquisition of IQ Martrade Holding Und Management GmbH's entire 23% equity shareholding in TM International Logistics Ltd., resulting in IQ Martrade's exit. Following completion, Tata Steel and NYK (Europe) B.V. will hold 74% and 26% equity shareholding, respectively. TM International Logistics primarily serves Tata Steel's logistics and cargo transportation requirements through railway cargo transportation, port operations and cargo handling, freight forwarding, and value-added logistics services.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves acquisition of additional shareholding of Acko Technology  Services Pvt Ltd. by General Atlantic Singapore ACK Pte. Ltd</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74338</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74338</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition approval has been granted for General Atlantic Singapore ACK Pte. Ltd. to acquire additional shareholding in Acko Technology  Services Private Limited through the target's rights issue, resulting in the acquirer crossing the 25% shareholding threshold on a fully diluted basis. The target is an Indian insurtech company with subsidiaries conducting licensed general and life insurance businesses, while another subsidiary awaits a corporate agency licence for insurance-policy distribution.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Minister of Commerce  Industry Shri Piyush Goyal invites Japanese businesses to deepen investments and partnerships in India</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74337</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74337</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-Japan economic cooperation is positioned for deeper investment and commercial partnerships in manufacturing, technology, infrastructure, energy, defence, artificial intelligence, semiconductors, critical minerals, batteries and next-generation mobility. Uttar Pradesh is identified as a prospective destination for Japanese investment because of its workforce, connectivity, manufacturing base, MSME sector, export capacity, transport infrastructure and industrial clusters. Investment facilitation is associated with reforms in ease of doing business, digital public infrastructure and multimodal logistics.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Department of Commerce Organises Awareness Session on EU CBAM Regulations for Exporters</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74336</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74336</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism compliance requires exporters to address covered products, embedded-emissions calculation, data collection, reporting, accreditation and verification. Preparedness across the export value chain depends on timely emissions data from suppliers and other stakeholders, supported by credible verification mechanisms. Capacity-building and engagement seek to facilitate workable compliance with evolving sustainability-related international trade requirements.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>PSB Confluence 2026 concludes with actionable strategies across seven themes for Public Sector Banks and Public Financial Institutions</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74335</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74335</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Public Sector Banks and Public Financial Institutions are urged to implement actionable strategies with clear ownership and realistic timelines. Youth banking engagement is to be strengthened through a focused campaign, a common digital access platform and physical outreach, supporting young customers' evolving financial needs. Priority sector lending requires granular monitoring, early identification of target gaps and productive credit flow to intended beneficiaries. Agriculture and horticulture value-chain financing may cover farmer producer organisations, storage, processing, logistics and market linkages, while credit card strategies include digital onboarding, cross-selling and RuPay-UPI integration.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IN GST, "YES" IS NOTHING WITHOUT "HOW" A Demand Is Not Sustainable Unless the Proper Officer Explains How the Liability Arises</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17226</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17226</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST demands require a factual and statutory explanation of how liability arose, rather than conclusions based on mismatches, short payment, inadmissible input tax credit, suppression or penalty. The proper officer must state relevant facts and reasons, while confirmation must remain within the amount and grounds in the show-cause notice. Return mismatches may trigger scrutiny but do not themselves prove tax evasion. Input tax credit denial requires invoice-specific identification and examination of the statutory condition allegedly breached. Speaking orders must consider the taxpayer's defence and disclose reasons; technology may identify anomalies but cannot adjudicate liability.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Layers of a Shipping Bill under Indian Customs Law.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17225</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17225</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Shipping Bill is the statutory electronic declaration for export goods and requires the exporter to ensure accurate particulars, authentic supporting documents and compliance with restrictions and prohibitions. It integrates transaction identity, commercial value, FOB computation, tariff classification, goods particulars, licences and supporting certificates. Customs processing may include assessment, examination and risk-based verification, followed by the Let Export Order permitting clearance and loading. The declaration may determine export duty, support drawback or export remissions, and operate for IGST refund purposes subject to manifest and GST data requirements. Incorrect declarations can lead to confiscation and penalty proceedings.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Department has helped the taxpayer to get 100 % relief by way of their arguments which went against the department in GSTAT, Thiruvananthapuram Bench.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17224</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17224</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Delayed issuance of MOV-09 after MOV-07 is examined as a limitation defect in detention-based penalty proceedings. The penalty order under section 129(3) must be issued within seven days from service of the penalty notice. MOV-09 issued forty-seven days after MOV-07 was treated as illegal and without jurisdiction. Since the defect was apparent from the record, it could be considered in the second appeal even though it had not been specifically raised before the first appellate authority. Similar cases should be reviewed for breaches of the mandatory timeline.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>An Advocate's Robe Does Not Decide GST on Insolvency Professional Services</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17223</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17223</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST treatment depends on the actual service supplied, not merely on the supplier's professional identity. Legal services rendered by an Advocate may fall under reverse charge where the applicable notification conditions are met. However, services rendered as an Interim Resolution Professional or Resolution Professional are independently classified as insolvency and receivership services. Since reverse charge does not cover that specific category, an Advocate acting as an Insolvency Professional is subject to forward charge and must issue GST-compliant invoices, subject to applicable registration and statutory requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>All orders imposing unwarranted penalty under Section 129 /130 of CGST Act 2017 requires a revisit if adverse order is passed by first appellate authority.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17222</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17222</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST appellate remedies remain available for adverse first-appellate penalty orders, including delayed appeals with condonation under Section 112(6) within the stated period. Movement of goods to a taxpayer's own depot within the same State, without consideration, is examined as a stock transfer rather than a supply. Where the sole allegation is absence of an e-way bill and no tax demand arises, the analysis identifies a GSTAT decision concluding that penalty under Section 129 is not leviable for such stock-transfer movement.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax Adjudication Cannot Sleep for Fourteen Years</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17221</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17221</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Delayed customs adjudication under Section 28(9) must be completed within the prescribed period or within a demonstrably reasonable and practicable period. "Where it is possible to do so" permits limited flexibility, not indefinite pendency, and authorities must establish why timely adjudication was impracticable. Limitation affects jurisdiction and protects legal certainty and effective defence. A later extension of limitation cannot ordinarily revive a proceeding already barred. Call Book pendency requires supporting material and cannot preserve stale demands. Excessive unexplained delay may be arbitrary under Article 14.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Layers of Customs Litigation and Appeals: A Comprehensive Guide to the Customs Dispute Resolution Framework</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17220</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17220</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs dispute resolution proceeds from self-assessment, reassessment or departmental verification to show cause notice, reply, personal hearing and reasoned adjudication. Natural justice requires notice, knowledge of allegations, access to relevant evidence subject to legal limits, an opportunity to submit material and be heard, and appellate recourse. Appeals may proceed through the Commissioner (Appeals), CESTAT and courts on the prescribed scope of review, while writ jurisdiction is exceptional. Importers generally establish exemption or preferential-tariff eligibility, and Customs must support allegations with legally admissible evidence. Accurate documentation and proactive compliance help reduce disputes.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Layers of Customs Audit  Investigation: A Comprehensive Framework for Customs Compliance, Verification, and Enforcement.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17219</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17219</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs audit is a post-clearance process for verifying declarations, records, compliance and correct duty assessment, while investigation addresses suspected fraud, misdeclaration, undervaluation, smuggling, exemption misuse or duty evasion. Risk-based scrutiny may cover classification, valuation, origin, exemptions, end-use, export obligations, refunds, drawback, licences, bonds and records. Proposed duty recovery or penalties ordinarily require a show cause notice and opportunity to respond and be heard. Businesses should maintain accurate records, support exemption and preferential-origin claims, preserve evidence, cooperate with lawful requests, and periodically review customs controls.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Advance Authorisation under Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023: A Comprehensive Legal and Procedural Analysis for Export Professionals.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17218</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17218</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Advance Authorisation is a conditional duty-exemption mechanism for inputs used in export production. Duty-free imports require electronic authorisation, customs registration, bond execution and bank guarantee where applicable. Imported inputs remain subject to the actual user condition and must be used for authorised export production. Export obligation must be fulfilled through prescribed quantity, value, product-linkage and export-proceeds requirements, supported by import, export and consumption records. An Export Obligation Discharge Certificate is obtained after prescribed filings, but customs bond cancellation and bank-guarantee release require separate customs verification.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ISO 22320:2018 Emergency Management Guidelines: A Comprehensive Guide to Incident Response and Disaster Management.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17217</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17217</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ISO 22320:2018 emergency management guidelines support structured incident response through clear command and control, coordination, communication, information management, decision-making and resource deployment. Organisations should define leadership authority, response roles, reporting relationships, escalation procedures and communication channels. Accurate, timely and authorised access to incident information supports risk-based decisions and stakeholder coordination. Implementation includes risk identification, emergency procedures, training, exercises, post-incident reviews and corrective action. Integration with continuity, safety, security and risk-management systems can strengthen preparedness, response capability and organisational resilience.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Regular bail in GST input tax credit fraud granted after investigation concluded and continued custody lacked justification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102846</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102846</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Regular bail was granted to an active partner accused of availing GST input tax credit through firms whose registrations had been cancelled from inception for non-existence or non-operation. Investigation had concluded and a complaint had been filed. Given the maximum prescribed punishment and the absence of reasonable grounds for continued custody, further detention was considered unwarranted. Bail was made subject to stipulated conditions, without affecting the Department's ability to take other measures available in law or the merits to be determined at trial.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102846.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102846.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Bail in GST input tax credit prosecutions requires concrete risks, not criminal antecedents alone, where investigation is complete.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102845</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Bail in GST prosecutions involving alleged fraudulent input tax credit depends on whether detention is necessary to secure trial attendance or prevent interference with justice. Criminal antecedents alone do not justify refusal without material indicating a risk of absconding, witness intimidation, evidence tampering, repetition of offences, or other obstruction. Pre-trial detention is not punitive, particularly where investigation is complete, the prosecution rests on documentary evidence, and trial may be delayed. The offence being triable by a Magistrate and carrying limited maximum punishment, together with the absence of assessment proceedings that could affect the alleged contravention, supported release on conditions protecting the trial and prosecution evidence.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Criminal antecedents alone cannot defeat bail where GST evidence is documentary and prolonged pre-trial detention lacks justification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102844</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102844</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Bail in GST prosecutions involving alleged fraudulent input tax credit through fake invoices should not be denied solely because of criminal antecedents where no exceptional risk of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, evasion, or misuse of liberty is shown. Completed investigation, a filed complaint, predominantly documentary evidence, Magistrate-triable offences, and the absence of an immediate prospect of trial completion support release, consistent with the presumption of innocence and the non-punitive nature of pre-trial detention. Bail was granted subject to conditions preventing interference with evidence or witnesses, similar offences, unauthorised foreign travel, and requiring attendance before the trial court.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Extended limitation notices require pleaded fraud or suppression with intent to evade tax, otherwise they are unsustainable.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102843</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102843</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Extended limitation under Section 74 of the SGST/CGST Act requires a show-cause notice to specifically allege fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of material facts with intent to evade tax. A notice issued for the relevant tax period without disclosing these statutory ingredients cannot be sustained. The impugned notice was quashed, while the tax authorities retained liberty to issue a fresh notice in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Parallel GST proceedings require identical subject matter, while fact-intensive objections should ordinarily proceed through statutory appeal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102842</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102842</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Parallel GST proceedings are barred only where Central and State proceedings concern the same subject matter. Common input tax credit issues or the same financial year alone do not establish that condition; the respective show-cause notices, allegations, transactions, computations, evidentiary material and proposed liabilities require comparison. Where an effective statutory appeal is available and the objection requires examination of the underlying record, writ jurisdiction need not be exercised. Failure to raise the objection in a written reply and participation in adjudication may be relevant to discretionary writ relief, without deciding the objection on its merits. The parallel-proceedings issue and demand challenge remain available for appellate consideration.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Legal possession for GST registration cannot be denied solely because landlords dispute the tenant's lease rights.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102841</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102841</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST registration requires the registering authority to verify whether the applicant has legal possession of the business premises, without conducting a detailed adjudication of landlord-tenant disputes over the scope of lease rights. Lease documents permitting showroom operations, co-lessees' authorisation for a managing partner to form and operate a partnership firm, and landlords' own proceedings indicating the partner's possession may prima facie establish the firm's legal possession for registration purposes. Where a registration application lacks required supporting documents, a fresh application may be filed with those documents and must be considered in accordance with these principles within the stipulated period.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit benefits must reach eligible property buyers, with interest and potential anti-profiteering penalties for shortfall.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102840</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102840</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Additional input tax credit arising in a construction project must be passed to eligible buyers through commensurate price reductions under the anti-profiteering framework. Buyer-wise verification may establish that substantial credit has been passed on while identifying outstanding benefit due to remaining recipients. Unpassed benefit attracts interest from the date of supply because recipients were deprived of the monetary benefit; it cannot generally be withheld against disputed consideration where a separate consumer dispute remains pending. Continuing failure to pass on benefit after the penalty provision took effect can also attract a penalty, subject to the statutory relief available where the profiteered amount is deposited within the prescribed period.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Input tax credit reversal amendment operates prospectively, while unsupported fraud allegations require assessment under ordinary demand procedures.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102839</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102839</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[CBIC monetary-limit instructions bind central tax officers, not the Tribunal. Where a composite order covers multiple demands, the total amount involved must be considered; appeals concerning recurring issues or statutory interpretation fall outside the monetary-limit bar. Duty credit scrips became exempt supplies in 2017, but their exclusion from aggregate exempt supplies for proportionate input tax credit reversal applies prospectively from 5 July 2022. The later amendment conferred a prospective benefit and did not retrospectively alter earlier reversal obligations. Extended demand proceedings require material showing fraud, wilful misstatement or deliberate suppression intended to evade tax; mere non-declaration is insufficient. Absent such material, tax liability must be determined under the ordinary demand procedure after hearing the taxpayer.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Draft assessment procedure cannot create enforceable tax demand where no final assessment exists or international transaction variation is proposed.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102838</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102838</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[A draft assessment order cannot support a tax demand or penalty proceedings because a demand requires a final assessment determining the sum payable. Where an order's heading, operative language, proposed disallowance, objection mechanism and express non-issuance of demand consistently identify it as a draft, it cannot be treated as final merely as an uploading error. The statutory curative provision does not validate this substantive defect, particularly where no corrective or final assessment order follows. Draft-assessment procedure is also unavailable where no variation in international transactions is proposed, leaving no competence to issue a draft order. The draft order and consequential demand and penalty notices were set aside.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Finality of appellate findings bars revision, while unsupported allegations of undisclosed tanker income cannot sustain an addition.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102837</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revision of block assessment under section 263 could not revisit additions concerning claimed unaccounted expenditure, asset investments and petrol-pump income after those additions had been adjudicated in appellate proceedings and the Tribunal's decision had attained finality following dismissal of Revenue appeals. Revisionary proceedings on those matters were therefore set aside. Regarding tanker acquisition and operating income, concurrent factual findings after record verification established no material showing unaccounted income. With no legal infirmity in those findings, deletion of the tanker-related addition was sustained and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in India.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102836</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102836</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Service permanent establishment analysis under the India-USA DTAA requires services to be furnished through employees or other personnel and excludes services covered as royalties or fees for included services. Stewardship, oversight and other auxiliary activities do not establish a service PE unless the nature of training, administrative, news-gathering or sales-support functions is shown to exceed auxiliary activity or to constitute technical or consultancy services. A distributor operating independently on a principal-to-principal basis, without authority to conclude contracts, maintain delivery stock or habitually secure orders, does not constitute a dependent agent PE. Where intercompany dealings are at arm's length, no further profit is attributable to an alleged PE.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Safe harbour for unquoted share valuation treats issue price within the permitted Rule 11UA variation as fair market value.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102835</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 56(2)(viib) share-premium additions may not arise where the issue price of unquoted shares exceeds the Rule 11UA value by no more than 10%. The CBDT's curative safe-harbour amendment treats the issue price within that permissible variation as fair market value. Applying this safe harbour, an addition for excess share premium within the 10% range was treated as unsustainable and deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscription expiry.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102834</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102834</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SaaS subscription receipts from Indian customers for a standard, non-customised software development kit and dashboard facility did not constitute fees for included services under Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA. Customers integrated the product and generated reports independently, while the provider retained its algorithms, source code and processes; use of technology did not make technical knowledge available for independent post-subscription use. Incidental account management, support and demonstrations did not change the transaction's predominant automated character. The related additions were deleted for both assessment years. Tax deducted at source credit required Assessing Officer verification before grant, and the challenge to penalty initiation for under-reporting was premature.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Undisclosed income requirement limits search penalty where surrendered land advances are merely uncorroborated applications of funds.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102833</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102833</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penalty under section 271AAB requires undisclosed income as exhaustively defined in its Explanation; a surrender made during a search does not alone establish that statutory character. Land and other advances represent application or outflow of funds rather than an unrecorded income inflow, and deeming provisions for unexplained investments cannot be automatically applied to this self-contained penal provision. Uncorroborated diary notings without verifiable particulars cannot independently prove real transactions or undisclosed income. As the amount was accepted as current-year business income without a requisite finding of undisclosed income, deletion of the penalty on the surrendered advances was sustained.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Erroneous and prejudicial assessments permit revision where deeming provisions, special tax rates, and penalty proceedings were overlooked.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102832</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102832</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Revision of an assessment is warranted where the Assessing Officer fails to apply the statutory deeming provisions to additions for undisclosed investment and unexplained cash, omits the applicable special tax rate, and does not consider penalty proceedings. An order is erroneous when based on incorrect facts or law, made without due application of mind, or contrary to natural justice. It is prejudicial to revenue where lawful tax is not realised. The revisional authority may set aside such an assessment, direct further inquiry, and require reassessment under the correct provisions after providing an opportunity of being heard.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Protective additions for seized jewellery require independent evidence once ownership is substantively assessed in another taxpayer's hands.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102831</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102831</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Protective assessment of seized jewellery requires independent evidence that the person in physical possession is its actual or beneficial owner where the same jewellery has been substantively assessed in the hands of a company claiming ownership. Physical possession and inability to prove another person's ownership do not displace the Revenue's substantive treatment when the individual consistently denies ownership and no positive material establishes ownership. Failure to pursue a first appeal does not cure the absence of evidence or transform a protective addition into a substantive charge. The protective addition for unexplained jewellery was deleted, and consequential interest was to be recomputed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended purpose.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102830</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Donor-wise records containing names, PANs, addresses and supporting material established the identity of donors to a charitable trust. Undisputed remand-report records could not be displaced merely because donors did not comply with notices or because no further independent verification occurred. Evidence also showed that corpus contributions were intended for the trust's corpus. Voluntary and corpus donations from identified donors therefore could not be treated as anonymous donations, and the related additions were deleted. The challenge to the scrutiny notice was not pressed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Approved resolution plans bind tax authorities and extinguish pre-approval tax appeals where plan terms require withdrawal of proceedings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102829</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102829</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[An approved resolution plan binds governmental and statutory authorities and operates on a clean-slate basis for tax proceedings relating to pre-approval periods. Where plan clauses expressly extinguish and require withdrawal of pending tax proceedings concerning the corporate debtor, affiliates and subsidiaries, income-tax jurisdiction cannot be exercised inconsistently with the plan. A legal plea based on subsequent undisputed approval of the plan may be admitted in appellate proceedings where it goes to the root of the matter and requires no fresh factual enquiry. Income-tax appeals for the relevant pre-approval assessment years cannot continue; the taxpayer's appeals succeed on this preliminary issue, the Revenue's appeals fail, and merits issues remain open.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Penalty immunity under Vivad Se Vishwas excludes independent tax-audit defaults; futures and options turnover requires factual verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102828</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102828</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penalty immunity under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme does not extend to an independent penalty for failure to obtain a statutory tax audit merely because related quantum additions were settled. The penalty issue remains separately examinable. For futures and options transactions, tax-audit applicability depends on evidence establishing the transaction nature and turnover computation under the ICAI Guidance Note. Where the record does not show whether transactions were futures and options or delivery-based, the tax-audit requirement and consequential penalty require factual verification by the Assessing Officer after the taxpayer provides supporting particulars.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Eligible company incorporation timing controls capital-gains exemption; later commencement of manufacturing cannot cure an earlier incorporation date.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102827</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102827</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 54GB requires an investee company to have been incorporated in India within the stipulated period to qualify as an eligible company for capital-gains exemption. Commencement of business or manufacturing, acquisition of plant and machinery, or MSME registration cannot substitute for the legal incorporation date. A dormant company's later commencement of operations does not change its incorporation date under company law. Although incentive provisions may be construed liberally where ambiguous, an unambiguous exemption condition applies strictly. Investment in a company incorporated before the prescribed period therefore does not qualify for section 54GB exemption.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Transfer pricing method selection favours TNMM where medical-equipment distribution involves substantial post-import value addition and operational risk assumption.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102826</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Transactional Net Margin Method was treated as the most appropriate method for benchmarking purchases by a medical-equipment distributor performing substantial post-import functions, including configuration, integration, installation, training, warranty and maintenance support. The Resale Price Method was considered unsuitable where resale involved significant value addition and risk assumption, and the transfer-pricing adjustment based on that method was deleted. Comparable companies require verification where related-party transactions may exceed the prescribed filter. Verification was also directed to prevent double taxation where a sundry balance written back had already been offered to tax and was again added during return processing. The appeal was partly allowed, with the remaining issues remanded for fresh determination.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Sufficient cause for customs appeal delay requires bona fide diligence throughout; prolonged unexplained inaction defeats condonation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102825</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102825</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Condonation of delay in customs appeals requires a bona fide, satisfactory explanation covering the entire period of delay. Although "sufficient cause" receives a liberal, justice-oriented construction, that approach does not excuse gross negligence, lack of diligence or prolonged inaction. Participation through counsel, communication of the adjudication order to counsel, departmental efforts to serve the order, and failure to enquire about the outcome for nearly three years may support refusal of condonation; later receipt of an order copy does not explain earlier inaction. Under the Customs Act, High Court review does not permit reappreciation of such factual findings absent perversity, disregard of material evidence or legal error.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Fire-damaged vehicles treated as scrap cannot trigger import licensing confiscation, while vessel berthing alone is not unloading.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102824</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102824</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Fire-damaged motor cars brought with a vessel for ship-breaking may be classified as scrap where extensive damage has destroyed their identity and utility as motor vehicles, and salvage arrangements restrict disposal to demolition. Such goods are not restricted commercial or passenger vehicles, usable second-hand goods, or prohibited imports; confiscation for import without a licence is therefore not attracted. Unloading requires physical removal of cargo from a vessel; berthing at a notified ship-breaking port is not unloading. Where no unauthorised removal or other statutory contravention is established, neither the scrap cargo nor the vessel carrying it is liable to confiscation, and consequential penalties are unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Post-export shipping bill conversion remains available where contemporaneous evidence supports EPCG benefits despite curable procedural omissions and delayed requests.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102823</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102823</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Post-export conversion of free shipping bills into EPCG shipping bills cannot be rejected solely for delay where contemporaneous documentary evidence supports the export. The three-month limitation prescribed by a Board Circular was treated as inconsistent with Section 149, while the one-year period under the 2022 Regulations applies prospectively and does not govern earlier exports. Failure to state EPCG authorisation details in the original free shipping bills is a curable procedural lapse when export duty payment records, invoices and bank realisation documents establish the goods exported and receipt of export proceeds. Conversion must be processed after verification of that evidence.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Delayed customs refund interest starts after the refund-application period, with an enhanced rate for prolonged Revenue inaction.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102822</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102822</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest on delayed customs refunds of excess duty following reassessment commences after three months from receipt of the refund application, rather than from the later reassessment or refund order. Where the importer pursued reassessment and refund but Revenue delayed action for several years, the delay is attributable to Revenue. Interest was therefore payable from 20.02.2019 until the refund date. The applicable rate was 12 per cent, not 6 per cent, because the refund was withheld through prolonged inaction. The balance interest was required to be paid within eight weeks.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Special Additional Duty refund limitation cannot curtail substantive refund rights through subordinate legislation without statutory authority.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102821</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102821</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Special Additional Duty refund limitation under an amending customs exemption notification is addressed in relation to a claim rejected solely for filing beyond one year. The limitation was treated as requiring read-down because subordinate legislation could not impose a time bar affecting substantive refund rights without applying a statutory limitation under the parent enactment. A contrary High Court view was noted, but the refund claim was treated as covered by the decisions supporting read-down. The time-bar rejection was set aside, with consequential relief in accordance with law.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Toy parts classification permits concessional customs duty treatment where imported components lack the essential character of complete ride-on toys.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102820</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102820</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Imported electric ride-on toy components comprising only 60-65% of the parts needed for a complete toy, with essential components absent, are treated as toy parts rather than complete toys in CKD/SKD condition. Assembly with locally procured or manufactured components and subsequent testing produces a distinct finished product and constitutes manufacture under the concessional-duty import rules. Such imports are classified under CTH 95030091 and qualify for concessional customs-duty exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Cus. The Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020 does not apply because toy parts cannot independently be regarded as toys and BIS certification is not required for them.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs transaction value rejection requires Rule 12 procedure despite importer consent to reassessment of imported scrap values.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102819</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102819</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs valuation rules require the proper officer, before rejecting a declared transaction value, to form reasonable and cogent grounds for doubt, seek necessary information, disclose those grounds when requested, and provide a hearing under Rule 12. An importer's written consent to reassessment may dispense with a speaking order under Section 17(5), but does not make the enhanced value the declared transaction value, waive mandatory valuation procedures, or prevent challenge to final assessment. Enhancement of imported scrap values solely on consent was therefore set aside and remanded for fresh reassessment after statutory compliance and observance of natural justice.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tribunal intervention in requisitioned meetings requires proven impracticability, despite independent statutory remedies for members to convene them.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102818</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102818</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tribunal jurisdiction to convene a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting is not conditional on the requisitioning member first using its statutory power to call the meeting after Board default; those remedies operate independently. However, intervention in corporate internal management remains exceptional and requires a reasonable factual basis showing that convening the meeting through ordinary statutory or articles-based mechanisms is impracticable. Board division or rejection of a requisition alone does not establish impracticability. Where the requisitioning member neither demonstrates difficulty in convening shareholders nor uses the available statutory mechanism, a direction to convene the meeting lacks the required factual basis and should be set aside.]]></description>
<category>Corporate Laws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom permits reconsideration and rejection of a resolution plan before adjudicatory approval.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102817</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102817</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Committee of Creditors may reconsider a resolution plan at any time before the Adjudicating Authority approves it, including after remand to address statutory stakeholder claims. Directions requiring provision for provident fund, gratuity and other claims became final when unchallenged. Although the resolution applicant sought revision, it declined to increase the plan value when the remanded plan was reconsidered. The Committee of Creditors' commercial decision to reject the plan and proceed with liquidation was treated as non-justiciable in these circumstances. The proposed plan's rejection and the challenge to that rejection were upheld, with no basis for appellate interference.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Earnest money forfeiture in liquidation schemes fails where the proponent withdraws after its proposal is not accepted.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102816</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102816</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Earnest money guarantees furnished by scheme proponents in a liquidation process cannot be recovered merely because the proponent withdraws after its proposed scheme is not accepted. The guarantee secures submission of the proponent's own scheme and does not require submission of a scheme meeting the satisfaction of the stakeholders' committee or Adjudicating Authority. Commercial considerations and delay may justify a decision not to continue participating. Without an established legal basis imposing liability, withdrawal does not permit recovery of the guarantee for the liquidation estate. The direction requiring deposit of the earnest money guarantee into the liquidation estate was therefore set aside.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Money-laundering bail conditions prevailed where prima facie betting-account evidence, flight risk and progressing charges outweighed prolonged custody.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102815</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102815</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Alleged arrest irregularities did not support bail where the accused was produced before an available Magistrate after court hours and before the Special Court within twenty-four hours. Material showing that the written grounds of arrest were subsequently handed to relatives, together with prompt legal action on the accused's behalf, rebutted the claimed non-communication and showed no prejudice at the bail stage. Money-laundering bail remained unavailable despite prolonged custody because prima facie material linked the accused to providing mule accounts for illegal online betting, indicated a principal role, and raised risks of absconding, witness influence and evidence tampering. Proceedings had progressed towards framing of charges, and bail was refused.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Third-party property attachment requires proof of a money trail or equivalent-value liability, not alleged control alone.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102814</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102814</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Attachment of property held by a person not accused of money laundering requires proof that proceeds of crime reached that person and funded acquisition of the property, or that the property constitutes equivalent-value property of a person involved in laundering. Alleged control of the purchasing company by an accused, based mainly on witness statements, does not replace evidence of a money trail. Bank-financed acquisition and the company's own savings were not shown to be proceeds of crime, layered proceeds, or assets belonging to the accused. The provisional attachment and its confirmation were therefore set aside.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interim release of frozen funds permitted for verified salaries and statutory dues, subject to safeguards protecting attached assets.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102813</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102813</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interim access to frozen funds under the PMLA may be permitted for essential employee salaries and statutory dues where the liabilities are genuine, the subsidiary prima facie owes funds to its holding company, and safeguards preserve the attached assets. Verified payments of TDS and GST avoid compelled statutory defaults while benefiting the Central Government. Limited access was permitted for verified outstanding salaries and statutory dues, subject to submission of payment details, verification and bank-authorisation safeguards, without addressing the merits of the pending appeals.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interest on refundable revenue deposits runs from deposit date, while blanket enhanced interest awards require case-specific justification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102812</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102812</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest on refundable revenue deposits, including unspent Personal Ledger Account balances, is payable from the date of deposit where amounts were deposited during investigation before any duty liability was determined and therefore retained the character of revenue deposits. The majority view rejected the Revenue's challenge to interest from the deposit date and dismissed both appeals. The discussion distinguishes statutory and equitable interest and rejects blanket awards of 12% interest based solely on Sandvik, requiring consideration of relevant factors and later Supreme Court guidance. The majority treated the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Parle Agro as governing the entitlement to interest from the deposit date.]]></description>
<category>Excise</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>NDPS bail safeguards for foreign nationals require statutory compliance, verified sureties and proportionate measures to prevent absconding.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102811</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102811</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[NDPS bail for foreign nationals accused of offences involving commercial quantity remains subject to the statutory twin conditions, and incarceration alone does not displace them. Bail safeguards must protect Article 21 while reasonably securing attendance and preventing flight: passport deposit, FRRO registration, verified residence, disclosure of funds and bank accounts, embassy intimation, and ordinarily two genuine sureties may be required. Sureties must undergo pre-release scrutiny of identity, address and financial credentials; fabricated sureties may trigger departmental inquiry where officials failed to exercise reasonable care, and surety property may be subject to a lien or charge upon bond forfeiture. Interim Article 142 directions prescribe uniform safeguards pending action by competent authorities.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Disciplinary inquiry delay requires demonstrable prejudice; charge memorandum survives where competent authority validly considered the disciplinary proposal.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102810</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102810</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Rule 14(24) of the CCS (CCA) Rules does not automatically invalidate disciplinary proceedings merely because an inquiry exceeds the prescribed period without a written extension. Its time prescription is directory because it specifies no abatement or invalidation consequence; intervention requires inordinate unexplained delay, demonstrable prejudice, mala fides, or oppressive proceedings. Deferred promotion during pending proceedings alone is not legal prejudice. Approval of a charge memorandum is valid where the competent disciplinary authority considered the proposal, vigilance advice and relevant records; unsupported allegations of mechanical approval are insufficient. Preliminary fact-finding during deputation is permissible, and judicial review at the charge stage remains limited to jurisdictional error, patent illegality, mala fides, or fundamental statutory violation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Previous LDF govt didn't fulfil many obligations related to Vizhinjam port: CM Satheesan</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74334</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74334</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Vizhinjam port concession obligations include road and rail connectivity to maximise the benefits of export-import operations. The State government proposes land acquisition funding for a ring-road project, is engaging with central ministries on rail connectivity, and is seeking to expedite national-highway construction. Mission Samudra is intended to connect Cochin port and 18 mini ports with Vizhinjam to support lower-cost, faster exports. Concerns were also raised over the State government not receiving prior intimation of a proposed stake transfer in the port project company.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Sitharaman calls on public sector banks to translate strength into competitiveness and leadership</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74333</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74333</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Public sector banks are urged to use their customer base, branch networks, geographic reach, institutional experience and digital capabilities to build stronger competitive positions and leadership. Each bank may develop distinct areas of excellence based on geography, customer relationships, sectoral expertise, technology capabilities or international presence. Strategic priorities include deposit mobilisation, banking for youth, support for investment and global capability centres, agriculture and horticulture infrastructure, credit-card business reorientation and priority sector lending.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Sitharaman asks public sector banks to focus on youth; provide cool, simple banking to suit their needs</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74332</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74332</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Public sector banks are urged to implement sustained youth-focused banking through campus outreach, simple personalised round-the-clock services, dedicated youth support and financial awareness. Engagement should develop long-term relationships beyond account opening while preserving prudential standards. Youth should receive guidance on the formal credit ecosystem, including credit scores, credit history, bank credit products and government credit schemes, to support responsible credit discipline and future financial needs. A dedicated portal may provide a single access point for banking awareness and suitable financial opportunities.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>I-T department officials discuss roadmap for improving services for taxpayers</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74331</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74331</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Improvement of taxpayer services, reduction of tax litigation, infrastructure strengthening and preparation of an actionable roadmap for future Income Tax Department functioning were considered as operational priorities. Deliberations covered e-HRMS, service matters, reservation policy, systems administration, capacity building, expenditure budgeting, TDS administration, inter-agency coordination, and office infrastructure. Officials identified institutional challenges and priorities for strengthening taxpayer-facing and internal departmental functions.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>India-UK trade agreement to benefit Haryana's industries and services sector: CM Saini</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74330</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74330</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement provides duty-free access to the UK market for nearly all Indian exports and may improve the competitiveness of Haryana's manufacturing, agricultural, MSME and services sectors. Preferential access covers products including textiles, engineering goods, auto parts, processed foods and pharmaceuticals, while agricultural exports remain subject to exceptions for sensitive products. The agreement also provides market access across 137 UK services sub-sectors, supporting IT, digital, professional, financial and technical services and facilitating global value-chain participation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>FM asks banks to keep pace with youth expectation; calls for outreach campaign from Oct 2</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74329</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74329</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Public sector banks are urged to conduct a month-long "Banking for Youth" outreach campaign from 2 October 2026 for persons above 16 years of age. Outreach through educational and skill-development campuses should combine account opening, financial awareness and direct engagement. Banks should develop tailored youth strategies to build long-term banking relationships. Proposed measures include online learning content, lifestyle-linked benefits, dedicated youth banking support, and awareness of credit scores, credit products and government credit schemes. A dedicated youth banking-awareness portal may serve as a single access point for appropriate banking services and financial opportunities.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Foreign asset disclosure valuation rules set eligibility, electronic payment procedures, and conditional immunity for qualifying small taxpayers.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102809</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102809</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme Rules, 2026 establish electronic procedures for declaring specified undisclosed foreign assets and income. Fair market value is prescribed by asset class, generally using the higher of acquisition cost and valuation-date market value, with indexed cost deemed applicable where valuation is unavailable; special rules apply to bank accounts, transferred assets, reinvestment chains, partnership interests and currency conversion. Declarations in Form 1 are limited by separate aggregate-value thresholds for undisclosed assets and income, and for previously taxed or non-resident-acquired foreign assets not disclosed after becoming resident. Payment, electronic intimation and certification are mad.....]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102809.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102809.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs tariff values for edible oils, metals and areca nuts are revised with effect from 15 August 2026.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102808</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102808</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Tariff values for specified imported edible oils, brass scrap, gold, silver and areca nuts are substituted under the customs valuation framework. The revised tables prescribe tariff values for crude and refined palm oil and palmolein, crude soya bean oil, brass scrap, specified gold and silver forms, and areca nuts. The gold and silver entries distinguish goods qualifying for specified customs-notification benefits and certain other prescribed forms, while excluding particular silver articles and certain post, courier or baggage imports where stated. The revised tariff values take effect from 15 August 2026.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102808.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102808.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CCI approves acquisition of certain equity shareholding in Bharti Life Insurance Company by Prudential Corporation Holdings</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74328</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74328</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Competition approval has been granted for Prudential Corporation Holdings Limited to acquire certain equity shareholding in Bharti Life Insurance Company Limited. The acquirer is the holding company for its group's insurance and asset-management operations in Asia and supports operations in Asia and Africa. The target is an IRDAI-licensed Indian life insurer.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Applicability of GST under RCM on CFO renewal fees paid to KSPCB</title>
<link>/forum/issue?id=121074</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">/forum/issue?id=121074</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Consent for Operation renewal fees paid to a statutory pollution control board may be exempt where the service is supplied by a governmental authority in connection with environmental protection and ecological functions under Article 243W, thereby excluding reverse-charge liability. Supporting records should establish the payment, consent renewal, fee basis, and environmental-function nexus. A contrary view treats the consent as a taxable permission or authorisation rather than registration, attracting reverse charge and requiring self-invoicing and a payment voucher for input tax credit.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Discussion-Forum</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Suspicious foreign remittances under I-T department scanner</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74327</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74327</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Verification of suspicious outward foreign remittances focuses on entities with little or no reported business activity, their controllers, and accountants issuing tax-determination certificates. Scrutiny addresses remittances disproportionate to reported turnover, non-filers, entities not operating from declared addresses, and payments whose stated purposes appear inconsistent with reported activity. Form 15CB/Form 146 certification requires accountants to examine taxability through books of account and relevant documentation, validating tax deduction at source and applicable treaty compliance. Accountants must exercise due care, diligence and professional judgment before certifying remittances.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Delhi tightens rules for ration shops, makes big stock discrepancies an FIR offence</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74326</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74326</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Fair Price Shop regulation introduces quantity-based penalties for stock discrepancies, ranging from performance-guarantee forfeiture and replenishment obligations to interim suspension, cancellation-related action and mandatory FIR registration for major shortages. Repeated or deliberate diversion or manipulation of public distribution supplies may lead to cancellation, blacklisting and FIR registration. Licensing now includes continuing regular licences and short-term temporary licences, with wider eligibility, points-based selection, card-linked performance guarantees and compulsory approved e-PoS, weighing-scale and iris-scanner use.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) Record Strong Growth in Credit Delivery during FY 2025–26</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74325</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74325</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Regional Rural Banks expanded rural credit delivery while maintaining strong Priority Sector Lending performance during FY 2025-26. Almost all Regional Rural Banks met the prescribed overall priority-sector target. Agriculture and allied activities remained the largest priority-sector component, with farm credit accounting for nearly all agricultural lending. MSME finance predominantly supported micro enterprises, rural entrepreneurs, artisans and small businesses. Lending to weaker sections and finance for housing, education, renewable energy and social infrastructure promoted inclusive access to institutional credit and sustainable rural development.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>METSTO Delivers Adjustable Pallet Racking System Solutions for Warehouses</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74324</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74324</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Adjustable pallet racking systems are configurable warehouse-storage solutions for varied inventory dimensions, weights and product types. They support bulk pallet storage, multi-level picking and high-density configurations through adjustable beams and shelves, load-bearing capacity, structural durability and space-efficient layouts. Storage configurations are customised after assessing inventory dimensions, payload requirements, available space and material-movement frequency, with support for design, installation, inspections and after-sales service.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>China rolls out new measures to boost consumption in counties, smaller cities</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74323</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74323</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[China has introduced measures to strengthen domestic consumption in counties, smaller cities, townships and rural areas. The measures include upgrading township commercial centres, rural markets and local fairs; encouraging domestic and international brands to establish regional debut stores; and reusing existing land resources to improve services. They also seek better services for elderly persons and children, stronger urban-rural distribution networks, county-level employment and resident income channels. The strategy supports a shift towards household consumption amid weak domestic demand, property-sector pressures and subdued consumer sentiment.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Strengthening Collaboration to Preserve Sovereignty: Collaborative Cash Ecosystems - Global Strategies to Preserve Trust and Sovereignty - Keynote Address [Contributions by Shri Sanjeev Prakash, Chief General Manager, and Ms. Hema Chatterjee, General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, are gratefully acknowledged. delivered by Shri Shirish Chandra Murmu, Deputy Governor at Focus Group Discussion: Global Cash Management, 2026, organised by Bank Indonesia in Jakarta, Indonesia, on August 13, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74322</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74322</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Currency management supports trust in cash and monetary sovereignty through demand planning, secure production, distribution, replacement, and disposal. The Clean Note Policy requires good-quality banknotes to be available in required denominations and locations, with unfit notes continuously withdrawn and replaced. A decentralised Currency Chest network distributes fresh currency, processes returned notes, supports linked bank branches, and operates under licensing, real-time reporting, inspection, and audit requirements. Current priorities include managing uncertain cash demand, improving note durability, and reducing the carbon footprint of the cash cycle.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>SC asks CBI to examine all six allegations of dubious transactions involving Indiabulls</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74321</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74321</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Investigation into alleged dubious transactions involving Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited and related entities must cover all six allegations identified by the Enforcement Directorate. The CBI must independently examine five allegations previously reviewed by the Delhi Police Economic Offence Wing, irrespective of its conclusion, and submit a comprehensive report. Further investigation into the sixth allegation depends on the special PMLA court deciding the CBI's pending application, after which the CBI must provide a progress or status report.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Cyber fraudsters invent 'boss' scam to target companies; Ahmedabad cops bust international network</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74320</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74320</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Boss scam, or CEO impersonation fraud, uses malicious WhatsApp attachments and impersonation of regulatory officials or company executives to obtain control of WhatsApp sessions and issue fraudulent payment instructions. The alleged network supplied SIM cards, dummy SIMs, WhatsApp accounts and one-time passwords to cyber-fraud operators, illustrating a Cybercrime as a Service model. Preventive measures include avoiding suspicious ZIP, executable, library and APK files and independently verifying all financial-transfer requests.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Personal Loan Prepayment Charges: What RBI Rules Say in 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74319</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74319</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Prepayment charges are prohibited for part or full repayment of qualifying floating-rate loans availed by individual borrowers for non-business purposes and sanctioned or renewed on or after 1 January 2026. Compulsory lock-in periods cannot restrict prepayment of such loans. Fixed-rate personal loans may still attract prepayment or foreclosure charges under lender policy and contractual terms. Borrowers should check the loan's rate type, sanction letter, loan agreement and key fact statement, where applicable, and compare applicable charges with potential interest savings before early repayment.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Zeeba Revamps Packaging and Announces Chef Vikas Khanna as Its Global Brand Ambassador</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74318</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74318</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Zeeba has refreshed its packaging and appointed Chef Vikas Khanna as global brand ambassador to support expansion in India. Its "Aisa Basmati Nahi Dekha" campaign positions the brand around export-quality Basmati rice, consistency, authenticity and a superior culinary experience. Promotional activity will extend across digital, retail and consumer touchpoints. The premium Basmati range is described as carefully sourced, naturally aged and processed according to global quality standards, with emphasis on grain quality, authentic taste, purity and consistency.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Paul Merchants Finance Launches Loan Against Silver, Becomes India’s First NBFC to Set Up Exclusive Silver Loan Branches</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74317</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74317</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Loans against silver collateral have been introduced following the Reserve Bank of India's Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral Directions, 2025, enabling eligible regulated lenders to accept silver as security. The offering provides a formal and transparent credit channel against eligible silver jewellery, ornaments and approved silver coins. It is intended for individuals, proprietors and MSMEs requiring liquidity for personal, business and other legitimate financial needs, subject to lending policies and applicable regulatory requirements.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>CarePass Launches This Independence Day, Bringing Healthcare Savings Across India's Top and Premium Hospitals</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74316</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74316</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[CarePass is a healthcare savings membership card providing instant point-of-billing discounts at participating premium healthcare providers across India. It covers out-of-pocket spending on hospital treatment, diagnostics, dental, vision, dermatology, hair and skin care, and IVF and maternity services, without claim processing, waiting periods or paperwork. Members present a digital CarePass at a participating provider to receive the applicable discount. Four membership tiers offer differing benefits, with higher tiers including tele-consultations and annual health checks. CarePass is a discount membership and not an insurance product.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Keralam CM flags off containers from Vizhinjam, marking start of EXIM operations</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74315</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74315</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[EXIM operations at Vizhinjam international seaport commenced with the flagging off of two containers after a successful trial export shipment. The state government proposes investor engagement, regulatory facilitation and infrastructure support to expand global export activities through the port. Mission Samudra is to operate as a port-led industrial and logistics development scheme. The deep-water port was developed under a public-private partnership model and had received commercial commissioning certification.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Kerala: Fresh ED raids in CMRL-Exalogic Solutions case</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74314</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74314</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Money-laundering investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act involves fresh searches connected with Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd and Exalogic Solutions. The inquiry concerns alleged fraudulent payments made under the guise of IT consultancy services and a purported money trail involving persons allegedly connected with those transactions. The action follows earlier searches and questioning in relation to the same matter.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ED raids KPSC office, ex-chairman in veterinary officers hiring 'scam' case</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74313</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74313</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Money-laundering investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act concerns alleged irregularities in veterinary officers' final selection through a public recruitment examination. Searches covered premises linked to commission officials, alleged intermediaries, the digital evaluation entity, and selected candidates. Allegations include bribery demands, examination-paper leakage, OMR answer-sheet tampering, and facilitation of selection for relatives of commission officials.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Keralam CM reviews operational preparedness at Vizhinjam port</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74312</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74312</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Operational preparedness for full land-based export-import operations at Vizhinjam Seaport was reviewed, including the Vehicle Traffic Management System. EXIM cargo operations follow a trial shipment of the port's first export container to Valencia. Mission Samudra is proposed to support port-led industrial and logistics development alongside these operations. The deep-water port was developed through a public-private partnership model and had obtained commercial commissioning certification before its dedication to the nation.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST recovery pending appeal: bank attachment lifted and coercive action restrained, while input tax credit merits await determination.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102807</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102807</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST recovery pending a statutory appeal may warrant interim protection where more than 10% of the assessed demand has been recovered and the required appeal pre-deposit has been made. Further coercive recovery may be restrained, and attachment of the proprietor's bank account may be lifted to enable business operations, subject to maintaining sufficient balance and bank monitoring. The merits of the GST demand, including input tax credit availability, remain for the Appellate Authority. Recovery may resume in accordance with law if the appeal is dismissed and the demand is upheld.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102807.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102807.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Supplier registration cancellation alone does not defeat input tax credit or justify custodial interrogation without evidence of purchaser collusion.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102806</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102806</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Cancellation of a supplier's GST registration or closure of business does not, by itself, defeat a purchaser's input tax credit entitlement; the department must establish collusion between the supplier and purchaser. Alleged fraudulent input tax credit availment was not prima facie supported where there was no material showing foundational supplier violations, and subsequent supplier non-existence or registration cancellation was insufficient. Anticipatory bail was granted because the petitioners lacked criminal antecedents, had appeared before authorities, and undertook to cooperate and produce documents; custodial interrogation was not warranted merely because the allegations involved an economic offence. Release was subject to investigation-cooperation and appearance conditions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102806.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102806.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Penalty notice jurisdiction under UPGST turns on delegated authority and election of statutory appellate remedy.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102805</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102805</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Under the UPGST Act, State circulars are described as placing penalty proceedings under Section 122 within the framework of Section 127 and authorising the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax where the prescribed turnover threshold is met. A jurisdictional objection to a penalty show-cause notice was therefore considered prima facie untenable. The doctrine of election also applies where a taxpayer participates in proceedings on merits without raising a jurisdictional objection and challenges the adverse penalty order through writ jurisdiction. The taxpayer should pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with Limitation Act relief for the writ-pendency period available subject to statutory requirements.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102805.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102805.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Condonation of delay restored the GST appeal against retrospective registration cancellation for adjudication on merits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102804</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102804</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Condonation of delay in a GST appeal against retrospective cancellation of registration was granted to restore the appellate remedy. Following Ritik Acharya, whose applicability was not disputed, the High Court considered merits-based adjudication appropriate. The appellate order dismissing the appeal as time-barred was set aside, and the Appellate Authority was directed to entertain and decide the appeal on merits.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102804.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102804.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Intra-firm stock transfers without taxable supply cannot trigger detention penalties solely for missing e-way bills.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102803</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102803</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Intra-firm stock transfers between premises of the same registered person, without distinct entities or consideration, do not constitute supply and do not create tax liability. Consequently, detention penalty under section 129, which is quantified by reference to tax payable on the goods, is not leviable where no tax is payable. Absence of an e-way bill alone does not establish that such movement is non-genuine where there is no allegation or material of fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression or non-genuineness. A document-related breach during movement otherwise than for supply may instead attract the specific penalty provision for e-way bill contraventions.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102803.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102803.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Mandatory seven-day limitation for transit-goods penalty orders renders delayed detention penalties without jurisdiction under Section 129(3).</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102802</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102802</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 129(3) of the CGST/KGST Act requires a proper officer to pass a penalty order within seven days of serving a detention notice for goods in transit. The use of "shall" is treated as mandatory because the provision governs coercive detention and seizure powers, even though no express consequence is specified for delay. A penalty order issued forty-seven days after notice was treated as beyond the prescribed limitation and without jurisdiction. The resulting penalty and appellate orders were set aside, with consequential release of the bank guarantee.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102802.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102802.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST rate-reduction benefits on cinema tickets require commensurate price cuts; raising base prices to retain cum-tax fares breaches anti-profiteering rules.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102801</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102801</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 171(1) requires GST rate reductions to produce a commensurate reduction in the price payable by cinema-ticket recipients; charging GST at the reduced rate alone is insufficient where the operator increases the pre-tax base price and retains the same cum-tax fare. Regulatory permissions concerning maximum or proposed ticket fares do not displace this independent anti-profiteering obligation, particularly without competent approval of enhanced rates. Profiteering may be quantified by retaining the pre-rate-reduction base price, applying the reduced GST rate to determine the commensurate price, and comparing it with actual ticket sales. Where recipients cannot be identified, the determined amount with applicable interest is deposited in the Consumer Welfare Funds; no penalty applied for the investigation period.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102801.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102801.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>GST rate reduction benefits must lower cum-tax cinema ticket prices despite fare-regulation directions and proposed fares.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102800</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102800</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 171(1) requires GST rate-reduction benefits on cinema admission tickets to be passed to recipients through a commensurate reduction in cum-tax ticket prices. Retaining the same ticket price by increasing the pre-tax base price does not satisfy this obligation. Directions permitting collection of proposed cinema fares and representations to licensing authorities do not create an exception to the anti-profiteering requirement, particularly where approval is unsubstantiated or relates to later periods. Profiteering may be quantified by retaining the pre-reduction base price, applying the reduced GST rate to determine the commensurate price, and calculating excess collections from actual ticket sales, while excluding correctly accounted transactions at other rates.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102800.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102800.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tariff Notes prevail over trade parlance, classifying PTFE braided gland packing as plastic and subjecting it to GST.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102799</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102799</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[PTFE braided gland packing manufactured from PTFE fibre yarn for industrial stuffing-box sealing is classified as an article of plastic under HSN 39209949, rather than as a textile article for technical use under HSN 5911. Plastic monofilament exceeding the specified cross-sectional dimension is excluded from Section XI and falls within Chapter 39; braiding and industrial use do not alter that result. Clear statutory tariff headings, Section and Chapter Notes, and HSN Explanatory Notes prevail over industry practice and trade parlance. The product falls within the residual PTFE sub-heading under heading 3920 and attracts GST at 18%.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102799.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102799.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 10B loss set-off remains available against other undertaking profits despite separate computation of export-profit deductions.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102798</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 10B requires separate computation of export profits for each eligible software-export undertaking only to quantify the deduction. That separate computation does not alter the undertaking's profit or loss for computing combined income, nor does it displace the normal rules for inter-source and inter-head set-off and carry forward of losses. Losses of a Section 10B-eligible undertaking may therefore be set off against profits of other undertakings, with any unabsorbed balance carried forward in accordance with law. The contrary denial of set-off was set aside.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102798.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102798.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business profitability.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102797</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102797</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Contributions to an electricity board for augmenting a transmission network may constitute revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) where the board retains ownership, maintenance responsibility and the right to use the service line for other consumers. No tangible asset, ownership right or enduring capital asset arises for the contributor in those circumstances. The expenditure is incurred to improve the profitability of the existing business apparatus and does not render an assessment order erroneous or prejudicial to revenue merely because it was allowed as revenue expenditure.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102797.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102797.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment beyond four years fails where recorded reasons produce no addition and full disclosure conditions remain unmet.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102796</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102796</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment initiated beyond four years requires failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts relating to the recorded escapement of income. Explanation 3 to section 147 permits assessment of other escaped income discovered during valid reassessment proceedings, but does not expand the jurisdictional basis for reopening or sustain proceedings when no addition is made on either recorded ground. Where the recorded reasons yield no addition and the requisite failure of disclosure is not established, the reopening lacks jurisdiction. The reassessment was quashed, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102796.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102796.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Business loss carry-forward fails where intervening returns were not filed, preventing determination of unabsorbed losses for set-off.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102795</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102795</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Carry-forward of business losses requires the loss to be determined from a return filed under section 139(3) and quantified in assessment. Failure to file valid returns for intervening assessment years prevents determination and notification of the unabsorbed loss available for further carry-forward. Consequently, an earlier business loss cannot be set off in later years where intervening returns were not filed. The disallowance of the claimed set-off was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed because no substantial question of law arose.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102795.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102795.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 263 revision fails where completed inquiry shows no identifiable revenue prejudice from unsecured loans or trade payables.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102794</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102794</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 263 revision requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Where the Assessing Officer has called for and considered details on unsecured loans and trade payables, revision cannot rest merely on audit objections or an assumption that further inquiry would produce an addition under section 68. Explanation 2 creates a deeming framework for insufficient inquiry but does not remove the twin statutory requirements. In the stated circumstances, the assessment was made after inquiry, no revenue prejudice was identified, and the revisional order was quashed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102794.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102794.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>TDS on cash withdrawals remains the bank's responsibility, and unsupported liens over customer accounts must be released.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102793</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102793</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 194N places the obligation to deduct tax at source on the banking company making a cash payment, not on the customer withdrawing cash. Failure to deduct attracts the statutory consequence under section 271C against the person responsible for deduction. A bank cannot impose a lien on a customer's current account for an alleged TDS liability without statutory authority or a direction from the income-tax authorities. The lien was directed to be released and account operations permitted after the customer furnished income-tax returns for the relevant three consecutive years, without limiting lawful action by tax authorities.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102793.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102793.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Digital advertising and search optimisation costs remain revenue expenditure when they create no capital asset or enduring capital advantage.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102792</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102792</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Digital advertising and sales-promotion expenditure on media space, SMS broadcasts, search-engine optimisation, campaign content, marketing videos and social-media strategy is revenue expenditure where it comprises recurring promotional measures, creates no business asset and only improves product promotion through a digital platform. The enduring-benefit test does not make such expenditure capital without an asset or capital-field advantage. Payments for website and mobile-app search services are likewise revenue expenditure where they improve product searches, correct search terms and facilitate sales without creating a capital asset or enduring capital advantage. Disallowances of both categories were deleted; the Revenue's appeals failed and supportive cross-objections became infructuous.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102792.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102792.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Third-party search assessments fail after the statutory cut-off, while unrelated cash-acceptance penalties remain subject to strict limitation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102791</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102791</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Third-party search assessments under section 153C require the seized material to be handed over to the other person's Assessing Officer before the statutory cut-off. Where handover occurs after 1 April 2021, section 153C is unavailable and proceedings may be pursued only under reassessment provisions; the resulting notice and assessment lack jurisdiction. Penalty for cash acceptance contrary to section 269SS, when unrelated to assessment, is subject to the limitation period beginning with the Assessing Officer's recommendation to initiate penalty proceedings. A penalty order issued after that period is time-barred and liable to be quashed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102791.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102791.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Interest expenditure linked to interest-bearing advances is deductible against taxable interest income when the borrowing nexus is established.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102790</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102790</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest expenditure on borrowings used to make interest-bearing unsecured advances is deductible against taxable interest income under section 57 where the nexus is established. The Assessing Officer's findings showed that the advances to private parties were funded through interest-bearing loans from banks and non-banking financial companies. As the borrowing cost was directly connected with earning the interest income assessed under income from other sources, the disallowance was deleted for the relevant assessment years.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102790.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102790.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Consequential cash-receipt penalty fails when the underlying addition is deleted and seized material does not implicate the assessee.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102789</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102789</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penalty for cash receipts under section 271DA requires proof that the assessee received cash in breach of section 269ST. Where the underlying quantum addition was deleted because the alleged transaction involved other parties and not the assessee, no factual basis remained for a consequential penalty; deletion of the penalty was therefore upheld. The presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C apply against the person from whose possession or control seized material is found. A WhatsApp screenshot recovered from another entity's premises, without the assessee's name or admission of cash receipt, could not support a presumption against the assessee. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102789.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102789.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Post-purchase residential reconstruction costs qualify for capital gains exemption when they genuinely improve the acquired house for residence.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102788</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102788</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 54F permits exemption based on investment in a residential house through purchase, construction, or a combination of both. The cost of the new asset can include bona fide expenditure incurred after purchase for reconstruction, alteration, renovation and improvements that make the house fit for residence. Habitability of the purchased house and reconstruction expenditure exceeding its purchase cost do not independently restrict the exemption, as no statutory ceiling applies to construction quality or amenities. Expenditure on independent comfort items remains excluded. Where reconstruction expenditure is genuine and not linked to excluded items, the aggregate purchase and reconstruction cost qualifies for the Section 54F exemption.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102788.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102788.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Co-operative society deposit interest may retain business-income character, subject to statutory deposit conditions and factual verification.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102787</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102787</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on deposits of surplus profits may qualify as business income attributable to providing credit facilities to members where the deposits are mandated or permitted by the statute governing the society. This differs from interest on members' surplus receipts, which may be taxable as income from other sources. The deduction claim requires verification of the relevant deposit details and reconsideration in line with the applicable High Court principles. Expenditure disallowance for alleged tax-deduction failures and taxability of miscellaneous interest also require fresh examination where the society asserts non-service of a show-cause notice and seeks to furnish supporting particulars, ensuring an adequate opportunity of hearing.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102787.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102787.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Reassessment of a dissolved firm fails where successor income was already assessed and recorded reasons lacked transaction-specific material.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102786</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102786</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Reassessment against a dissolved partnership firm after its business succession is void where the Department had accepted that the firm ceased to exist and the successor proprietor disclosed and was assessed on the same business transactions and bank accounts. Assessing the erstwhile firm in these circumstances would duplicate taxation of the same business income. Jurisdiction for reassessment also requires recorded reasons identifying the relevant bank account or transaction and foundational material showing income escaped assessment; vague reasons do not meet that standard. A notice issued to a non-existent entity after succession renders the consequential assessment and estimated addition unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102786.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102786.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Commission expenditure linked to pharmaceutical marketing income qualifies as business deduction when recipient identity, genuineness and business purpose are established.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102785</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102785</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Commission payments to agents were allowable as business expenditure where they were intrinsically linked to commission income earned from pharmaceutical companies for facilitating marketing and sales. The disallowance based on an assumption that payments related to direct sales to Government hospitals lacked factual support. Recipient details, tax deduction at source, banking-channel payments and recipients' income-tax returns established the identity of recipients, genuineness of payments and business purpose. With no evidence of fictitious payments, non-existent recipients or diversion back to the assessee, the expenditure satisfied the wholly and exclusively business-purpose test and the disallowance was deleted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102785.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102785.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Section 87A rebate applies to tax on listed equity short-term capital gains taxed at the special rate.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102784</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102784</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 87A does not expressly bar rebate against tax payable on short-term capital gains from listed equity shares taxed at the special rate under section 111A. Applying a plain reading of both provisions and following the cited Tribunal precedent, rebate under section 87A is available in respect of such tax liability. Denial of the claimed rebate was therefore unsustainable, and the Assessing Officers were directed to grant it.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102784.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102784.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Unabsorbed depreciation retains its character and can offset house-property income despite absence of positive business income.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102783</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102783</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Brought-forward unabsorbed depreciation is added to current-year depreciation and retains the character of depreciation, allowing set-off against income under other taxable heads. Its availability does not depend on the existence of positive business income. Accordingly, unabsorbed depreciation may be set off against income from house property, consistent with the principle that it can be carried forward and adjusted against other taxable income.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102783.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102783.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Business expenditure and hedging premium claims remain allowable, while plant-related receipts reduce capital work-in-progress.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102782</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102782</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Employee-welfare payments to educational institutions and club expenditure were treated as business expenditure where incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Enabling-facility costs were characterised as revenue expenditure because no capital asset was acquired. Receipts directly connected with setting up a plant were treated as capital receipts reducible from capital work-in-progress. Depreciation on business vehicles and temporary structures was allowed, while a challenge based on additional depreciation was treated as misconceived because the relief concerned consequential differential depreciation. Bad debts, advances and claims written off were allowable. Premium amortisation on foreign-exchange forward contracts used fo.....]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102782.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102782.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Captive wind-power profits use consumer tariff for deduction; unsupported payment disallowance for alleged withholding failures cannot stand.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102781</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102781</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Profits from an eligible windmill unit's electricity transferred for captive consumption qualify for deduction under section 80IA. The profit must be computed using the rate charged by the Electricity Board to consumers, rather than the lower rate paid by the Board to generating companies. Payments were not liable to disallowance merely because payees could not be produced after a substantial lapse of time or because expenditure had increased over earlier years. The nature of payees, including labourers, contractors and job workers, and the fact that several payments were below the tax-deduction threshold, precluded treatment of the payments as unexplained. Deduction for captive wind-generated electricity and the payment claims were consequently accepted.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102781.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102781.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Indexed cost of improvement requires proof of actual works and payments; estimates and quotations cannot support the claim.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102780</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102780</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Indexed cost of improvement claimed on flats received under a joint development arrangement requires evidence of actual improvement works and related payments. Construction costs were contractually borne by the developer, and the flats were sold in the semi-furnished condition received from the developer. Quotations and estimates for proposed additional work did not establish material purchases, labour payments, or execution of improvements. The NALA component was also unsupported. Consequently, the claimed indexed cost of improvement was disallowed, and the appeal was dismissed.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102780.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102780.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Penny-stock sale additions require taxpayer-linked evidence, while undisclosed exempt capital gains can justify reassessment proceedings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102779</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102779</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Penny-stock share sale proceeds cannot be treated as unexplained money merely on suspicion of accommodation entries where purchases and sales occurred through banking channels, demat accounts and the stock exchange. Investigation findings about broker manipulation require material linking the taxpayer to bogus purchases, cash exchanges, price rigging or an entry arrangement; absent such evidence, documentary transaction records prevail and the addition is unsustainable. Exempt long-term capital gains nevertheless require disclosure through a return, and failure to file a return for the relevant year can justify reassessment proceedings.]]></description>
<category>Income Tax</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102779.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102779.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Evidentiary currency seizure under customs law remains retainable despite expiry of the notice period for confiscation proceedings.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102778</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102778</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Section 110 distinguishes goods seized for confiscation from documents or things retained as useful or relevant to Customs Act proceedings. The six-month notice period applies to goods seized under Section 110(1), but not to currency treated as a "thing" under Section 110(3) when retained as evidence in an investigation into fraudulent amnesty claims, suspected hawala transactions, illegal gratification, or related offences. Currency is treated as goods where it is itself the subject of a customs violation, such as undeclared cross-border carriage. The return direction was set aside, and the currency was to be deposited in an interest-bearing nationalised-bank scheme pending investigation.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102778.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102778.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Unjust enrichment in customs refunds fails where sales evidence proves duty incidence was not passed to buyers.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102777</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102777</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Unjust enrichment does not bar a customs-duty refund where evidence establishes that the duty incidence was not passed to buyers. A Chartered Accountant certificate, Bills of Entry and sales invoices showing bunker oil was sold below its import value supported non-recovery of even the import cost. Once that material was produced, Revenue needed tangible evidence that buyers bore the duty; recording duty as expenditure in the profit and loss account was insufficient. The High Court upheld the finding that the importer had not passed on the duty incidence, so the refund was properly allowed and no substantial question of law arose.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102777.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102777.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs detention starts the notice limitation period, invalidating extensions issued after the original period expires.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102776</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102776</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs detention of imported goods is synonymous with seizure once the goods are under Customs control and cannot be cleared without permission; a formal seizure memo is only a later procedural step. The six-month period for issuing a show-cause notice therefore runs from initial detention. Any statutory extension of that period must be granted and communicated before the original period expires; a later extension is without jurisdiction. The time-barred extension was quashed and the goods were directed to be released upon an indemnity bond and proof that any sale would be solely for animal-feed use. Classification, duty liability and the goods' nature remain open for adjudication.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102776.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102776.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs detention without seizure requirements is arbitrary; imported goods require conditional release while assessment and adjudication continue.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102775</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102775</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Detention of imported goods without complying with statutory requirements for seizure and notice is arbitrary and without legal authority. Even where goods may be prohibited, customs authorities retain discretion to allow provisional release on suitable conditions. Imported betel nut products retained pending classification assessment were directed to be released upon an indemnity bond for their value and a bank guarantee for part of the differential duty, subject to confirmation of fitness for human consumption. Customs authorities may continue adjudication in accordance with law. Demurrage waiver remains for consideration by the appropriate authority upon representation.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102775.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102775.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman chairs 3rd Meeting of Apex Monitoring Authority of NICDIT and reviews the progress of projects under NICDP</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74311</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74311</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[National Industrial Corridor Development Programme implementation prioritises timely infrastructure completion, land allotment, investment mobilisation and commencement of manufacturing. PM GatiShakti-aligned planning requires integrated connectivity, utilities and social infrastructure, while States should resolve land, clearance and SPV-power bottlenecks. BHAVYA proposes investment-ready, plug-and-play industrial parks appraised for ready land, credible demand, connectivity, utilities, realistic phasing and early investor attraction. NICDIT routes Government participation and equity support for BHAVYA project SPVs, and NICDC coordinates implementation and monitoring.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>News</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Customs show cause adjudication must meet statutory timelines; procedural amendments cannot revive stale or delayed claims.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102774</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102774</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs show cause notice adjudication must ordinarily be completed within one year under the unamended framework, unless the officer demonstrates that completion was impracticable. The phrase "where it is possible to do so" does not allow proceedings to remain pending indefinitely or for an unreasonable period. Limitation affects jurisdiction, rendering an order passed beyond the applicable period invalid. Although a procedural amendment may generally operate retrospectively, it cannot revive a stale claim; adjudication must also satisfy any extended period available under the amended regime. Unsupported placement in the Call Book does not justify prolonged delay. Unreasonable and arbitrary delay in adjudication violates Article 14 and can invalidate the resulting customs order.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102774.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102774.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained unrefuted.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102773</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102773</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Country of Origin Certificates accepted during customs assessment support preferential duty exemption unless cancelled, revoked, or shown to involve importer collusion. Of 38 certificates for stainless steel imports from Malaysia, one appearing on an unauthentic list was excluded after duty was paid, while the remaining 37 were treated as authentic for exemption purposes. Declared transaction value cannot be enhanced solely by reference to contemporary imports without following prescribed valuation rules or evidence of payment beyond invoice prices. Where allegations of non-genuine origin certificates and undervaluation fail, suppression with intent to evade duty is not established and penalties for misdeclaration or undervaluation do not arise.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102773.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102773.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Social Welfare Surcharge requires actual collection of basic customs duty, not MEIS or SEIS scrip debits.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102772</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102772</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Social Welfare Surcharge on imports under MEIS/SEIS duty-credit scrips depends on customs duties levied and collected, rather than notional duty quantified or debited under an exemption mechanism. Where notifications exempt goods from basic customs duty and the equivalent amount is debited in scrips, the debit does not constitute actual duty realisation. The surcharge base is therefore nil, making a separate surcharge exemption unnecessary. The Board circular is characterised as clarificatory and applicable to pending earlier-period disputes, while warehousing and education-cess rulings are distinguishable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102772.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102772.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Lawful domestic procurement evidence defeats gold confiscation when authorities fail to verify documents or prove smuggling and currency-sale links.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102771</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102771</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Verifiable evidence of lawful domestic procurement can discharge the claimant's burden for notified gold. Supplier invoices, bank-payment records and GST returns require departmental verification and rebuttal; foreign markings, delayed production of documents and uncorroborated or retracted statements do not by themselves establish smuggling or justify final confiscation. Initial seizure may rest on credible intelligence and reasonable belief, but final confiscation requires proof. Indian currency may be confiscated as smuggled-goods sale proceeds only upon proof of a proximate, identifiable link to specified smuggled goods and knowing dealings. Where these requirements are unmet, confiscation and related penalties are unsustainable.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102771.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102771.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Burden of proof for foreign-origin gold requires lawful import evidence; unsupported claims can trigger confiscation and penalties.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102770</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102770</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Foreign-origin gold seized under a reasonable belief of smuggling is subject to a statutory burden of proof requiring the claimant-owner to establish lawful import. Foreign markings, unsupported purchase documents and failure to correlate those documents with the seized bars may establish that this burden remains undischarged, rendering the gold liable to confiscation. Confiscation may be accompanied by redemption on payment of the adjudged fine. A person who knowingly handles, transports or possesses goods known or reasonably believed to be liable to confiscation may incur penalty. Handling and possession of gold found liable to confiscation can therefore support both confiscation-related consequences and a statutory penalty.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102770.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102770.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Vegetable extract classification: standardising oil and antioxidant additions do not convert Keranat into a residual food preparation.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102769</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102769</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Keranat, comprising millet and wheat extracts standardised with sunflower seed oil and containing rosemary extract, is treated as a compound and standardised vegetable extract under Heading 1302. The botanical extracts provide its essential character, while sunflower seed oil acts as a carrier, diluent and standardising medium and rosemary extract as an antioxidant; these additions do not make it a food preparation, medicament or other specifically covered product. As no named extract entry applies within the relevant sub-heading, the residual tariff item for other vegetable extracts applies. Classification under the residual food-preparation Heading 2106 is not appropriate. Keranat falls under CTI 1302 19 39.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102769.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102769.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Front-running allegations require SEBI's statutory complaint, barring investor FIRs that seek to prosecute securities-market offences directly.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102768</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102768</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SEBI Act offences involving front running must be prosecuted through a complaint filed by SEBI before the competent court, because section 26 bars cognizance on an investor's FIR. Front running involves using non-public information about impending substantial securities transactions to obtain wrongful gains and falls within the specialised securities-market regime. That regime prevails over general penal law where the FIR's allegations essentially constitute the SEBI offence, preventing circumvention through ordinary criminal registration. The FIR was quashed in its existing form, while leaving SEBI free to consider criminal action under the SEBI Act and preserving any independent remedies or distinct IPC/BNS offences.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102768.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102768.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Use of alleged crime proceeds for another company's liabilities rejected; interim release of frozen funds set aside.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102767</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102767</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Frozen funds alleged to be proceeds of crime could not be released under an interim arrangement to meet employee salaries and statutory dues of another company identified as the primary accused. The liabilities were not those of the company holding the frozen funds, and the asserted arrangement between the two companies did not justify their use. The interim direction permitting release was set aside, while the pending appeal before the Tribunal remained open for independent adjudication on its merits and was directed to be decided expeditiously.]]></description>
<category>PMLA</category>
<category>Highlights</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
<enclosure url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102767.jpg" type="image" />
<media:content url="https://www.taxtmi.com/file_folder/infographics/marquee_102767.jpg" medium="image" />
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Settled Means Settled - No Fresh SCN On A Decided Issue</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17216</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17216</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Finality of adjudication and judicial discipline prevent revenue authorities from reopening a classification controversy through successive show cause notices where identical facts and issues have already been decided by a competent court and the decision remains operative. Limitation only fixes the period for an otherwise lawful proceeding; it does not create jurisdiction. Revenue may challenge an adverse decision through available remedies and seek interim protection, but departmental review does not suspend its binding effect. Unless stayed or set aside, the decision must be followed.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17215</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17215</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Disclosure of a field visit report relied upon for cancellation of GST registration is necessary before deciding an application for revocation. A registered person must receive the foundational material and a meaningful opportunity to answer the allegations. Revocation is a substantive statutory remedy, and rejection requires an opportunity of hearing. Procedural fairness also requires specific allegations and disclosure of supporting material; vague assertions do not permit an effective response. Fresh consideration may require supply of the report, an opportunity to respond, and further business-place verification where necessary.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>PROCEDURE OF DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17214</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17214</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Debt recovery proceedings allow banks and financial institutions to seek recovery before the Debts Recovery Tribunal where jurisdiction is linked to the account-holding branch, a defendant's location, or the cause of action. Applications require prescribed pleadings, fees, supporting documents, asset disclosures and service on respondents. Defendants must file their defence and may raise set-off or counterclaims. Summons may require asset disclosure and restrict transfers. The Tribunal may order security or attachment to protect recovery, determine claims and interest, identify secured assets, and direct distribution of sale proceeds.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>USE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN GST SEARCH  SEIZURE</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17213</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17213</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[GST search and seizure incorporates criminal-procedure safeguards for searches of premises and persons, search warrants, access to closed places, disposal of articles, and officer-led searches. The corresponding Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita framework is identified as applicable following replacement of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Searches require valid authorisation founded on recorded reasons, document identification number compliance, a valid warrant, independent witnesses, a lady officer for residential searches, and a panchnama listing recovered material. Videography may be used in sensitive premises.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Corporate Guarantees Under GST: Taxability Survives, Arbitrary Valuation Does Not</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17212</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17212</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Corporate guarantees for subsidiaries may be taxable GST supplies between related persons even without consideration, where they provide credit support in the course or furtherance of business. Rule 28(2) remains a valid valuation mechanism where actual consideration is absent or unascertainable, but it cannot compel a higher notional value when lower actual consideration is ascertainable. Its application to guarantees furnished before 26 October 2023 is impermissible, though continuing guarantees may be assessed from that date. Section 74 cannot rest solely on a bona fide interpretative dispute.]]></description>
<category>GST</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>ISO 22301:2019 Business Continuity Management System (BCMS): A Comprehensive Guide to Disaster Recovery, Organizational Resilience, and Crisis Management.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17211</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17211</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[ISO 22301:2019 requires a Business Continuity Management System based on risk assessment, Business Impact Analysis, continuity strategies, incident response, crisis management, disaster recovery, performance evaluation, and continual improvement. Organisations identify threats, determine critical activities, acceptable downtime, recovery priorities, and resource needs, then establish recovery arrangements and test them through exercises and audits. Core requirements include defined scope, leadership commitment, policy, resources, competent personnel, communication, documented information, operational controls, and corrective action. The framework supports resilient essential operations, compliance, supply-chain continuity, and stakeholder confidence.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Tax Collected Twice Cannot Hide Behind Limitation</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17210</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17210</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Service-tax double collection under reverse charge is treated as an exceptional refund situation. Section 11B limitation and unjust-enrichment safeguards ordinarily govern service-tax refunds, but limitation cannot legitimise retention where the same tax has been recovered from both a service provider and the service recipient legally liable under complete reverse charge. Article 265 requires legal authority for tax collection and retention. The principle may have cautious relevance to GST reverse-charge and duplicate-recovery disputes, without creating a general exemption from refund limitation.]]></description>
<category>Service Tax</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>IATF 16949:2016: A Comprehensive Guide to Automotive Quality Management Systems.</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17209</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17209</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[IATF 16949:2016 is an automotive-sector quality management system framework operating with ISO 9001:2015. It requires prevention-oriented quality controls across planning, operations, supplier oversight, traceability, change management, performance evaluation and continual improvement. Risk prevention is supported through Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, control plans, statistical process control and measurement systems analysis. Product-safety and contingency processes address safety characteristics, escalation, traceability and operational disruptions. Customer-Specific Requirements must be integrated into relevant processes, while supplier development and auditing must assess process effectiveness and product conformity.]]></description>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
        <item>
<title>Layers of Customs Origin - Where Do the Goods Legally Originate?</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17208</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17208</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 20:21:10 +0530</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Customs origin establishes the legal economic nationality of goods and governs preferential tariff eligibility, trade remedies, import controls and country-specific customs treatment. Determination requires correct product identification and tariff classification, identification of the applicable trade agreement, and application of wholly obtained, substantial transformation, product-specific, regional value content and tariff-shift criteria. Minimal processing generally does not confer origin. Preferential claims require direct consignment where applicable, a Certificate of Origin and supporting production, cost, supplier and transport records. Importers claiming preference generally bear responsibility for demonstrating compliance with applicable Rules of Origin.]]></description>
<category>Customs</category>
<category>Articles</category>
<category>TaxLaws</category>
<category>TaxTMI</category>
        </item>
<item>
<title>TMI Updates - Newsletter dated: August 19, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=08/19/2026</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/newsletter?id=08/19/2026</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Newsletter for tax updates and legal information]]></description>
<category>Daily Updates</category>
<category>Tax</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>