<h1>Alleged removal of key documents and devices during ED PMLA coal-smuggling search, bid to add public functionary as accused rejected</h1> Allegations were made that a public functionary intervened during ED search-and-seizure operations in a PMLA money-laundering investigation linked to alleged coal smuggling, and removed physical documents and electronic devices described as 'key' evidence from raided premises. The asserted legal characterization is that such conduct amounts to obstruction of a lawful investigation and forcible removal of seized or seizable material, which is described as a penal offence, and a demand was raised that she be arraigned as an accused under applicable criminal provisions. If accepted by the investigating agency and competent court, the consequence would be potential criminal liability and prosecution for interfering with and undermining evidentiary collection in the ongoing PMLA case.