Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Works contract classification of tripartite developer agreements challenged, prompting reconsideration of Raheja Development precedent by larger bench.</h1> The central question is whether tripartite agreements qualify as works contract: Raheja held that agreements entered before completion, where construction is carried out for and on behalf of the purchaser, remain works contracts despite developer lien or termination rights; if the unit is retained on termination or the agreement is post construction, works contract character ceases. A later bench questioned Raheja's breadth, found classifying tripartite agreements as works contracts prima facie problematic and referred the matter to a larger bench.