Mumbai, Jul 18 (PTI) The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India has pulled up the Maharashtra state excise department for serious lapses in its operations, leading to a substantial revenue shortfall.

The CAG report pointed out that due to incorrect assessment of licence renewal fees, the state lost Rs 20.15 crore in revenue and Rs 70.22 crore in interest.

The audit further said failure to implement revised rates for supervision fees led to an additional shortfall of Rs 1.20 crore.

According to the report, the then Excise Commissioner exempted excise duty on old stock of beer without obtaining prior approval from the state government.

The report also highlighted that delayed submission of mild beer samples for chemical analysis hampered tax recovery to the tune of Rs 73.18 crore.

"Under the Bombay Prohibition (Privilege Fee) Rules, 1954, a provision exists to charge fees for changes in partnership. However, no such provision was applicable to significant changes in shareholding of public limited companies, resulting in a loss of Rs 26.93 crore to the state," the CAG observed.

The absence of a provision in the Excise Act for declaring production cost also led to a missed opportunity for the government to earn additional revenue, it added.

The audit further revealed that in the case of Canteen Stores Department (CSD), the production cost of 11 products or brands was undervalued, causing a revenue loss of Rs 38.34 crore in excise duty.

Additionally, errors in the purchase cost of imported foreign liquor resulted in non-collection of Rs 11.48 crore between August 2018 and March 2022, and Rs 2.89 crore between May 2017 and March 2022.

The cumulative effect of these lapses has led to a massive revenue loss for the government, raising serious concerns over the functioning of the Excise Department, the CAG stated. PTI ND BNM

Excise audit lapses expose systemic revenue shortfalls and procedural failures, prompting scrutiny of licence, valuation and duty controls The audit finds procedural and valuation deficiencies in the Excise Department-incorrect licence renewal fee assessments, non-implementation of revised supervision fees, unauthorized duty exemptions on old beer stock, delayed chemical analysis of mild beer samples, lack of provision for declaring production cost, failure to charge fees on major shareholding changes under the privilege fee rules, undervaluation of CSD production costs, and errors in imported liquor purchase costs-each causing quantifiable losses to excise revenue.