1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Coram non judice challenge and time limit disputes delaying confirmation of provisional asset attachments under anti money laundering law.</h1> Two procedural issues have produced widespread litigation delaying confirmation of Enforcement Directorate provisional attachments under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act: coram non judice challenges to single member confirmations in the absence of the judicial member of the three member Adjudicating Authority, and disputes over the statutory 180 day limit for confirmation during extraordinary circumstances such as the COVID 19 pandemic. These challenges have led to multiple stay orders that account for a substantial portion of the gap between assets provisionally attached and those confirmed by the Authority.