1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Unjust enrichment principle: refunds require proof duty incidence was not passed on and strict accounting and documentary evidence.</h1> The circular applies the unjust enrichment test to refunds of excise, service tax and customs duty, presuming incidence is passed on except for exports, export inputs and unspent PLA; claimants must evidence non passing by recording refundable amounts as 'Duty Receivable' in Current Assets across relevant financial years, avoid capitalising duty into cost or depreciation, and produce specified documentary and certificate evidence (including supplier and recipient certifications and CENVAT credit reversals). Pre deposits are excluded from this test.