Functional comparability under TNMM supported exclusion of ITeS comparables with R&D, intangibles, diversified operations, or unavailable segmental da...
Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
