Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Omitted export-refund restriction cannot govern pending integrated-tax refund proceedings without an express saving or sunset clause.
    Arrest safeguards under the CGST Act support regular bail where recorded reasons and statutory thresholds are absent.
    Rule 86A credit restrictions require recorded written reasons; non-compliant ledger blocking may trigger compensation liability.
    Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
    Consolidated show-cause notices may cover multiple years, but appellate authorities must provide a meaningful hearing on merits.
    Statutory appellate remedy bars delayed writ challenge to GST registration cancellation absent exceptional circumstances, preserving fresh registratio...
    Fresh adjudication on contractual material requires reconsideration of service-tax demand and exemption claim after a hearing.
    Parallel GST proceedings on identical issues were invalid after Central GST adjudication for the same assessment period.
    Premature tax assessment before the annual-return deadline is invalid, requiring fresh proceedings with notice and hearing.
    Incorrect GST head payment: clerical IGST remittance can be adjusted against CGST and SGST without interest or penalty.
    Revisional relief for omitted charitable-trust capital-gains claims extends to fixed-deposit reinvestment where disclosure was complete.
    Subsisting reasons to believe fail when appellate relief removes every subsequent-year foundation for reassessment; the notice was quashed.
    Reason to believe in reassessment requires a live material nexus; unrelated allegations and later law cannot sustain reopening.
    Draft assessment procedure requires eligible-assessee status and final determination before demand or penalty notices can validly issue.
    Signed statutory approval is essential for reassessment jurisdiction; electronic authentication cannot replace a manual or digital signature.
    Intra-group service pricing adjustment deleted after arm's length price was set at nil without sustainable basis.
    Transfer-pricing benchmarking requires proven COVID costs, consistent TNMM classifications, and reliable internal CUP comparability before adjustments...
    Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
    Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
    Transfer-pricing comparability requires aligned related-party exposure, ownership profile, revenue model and sourcing-support functions to prevent dis...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Section 536(2) was construed as making post-petition...

Post-petition transfer validation under winding-up law upheld for a bona fide transaction benefiting creditors and lacking fraud.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Companies Law May 9, 2026 Case Laws HC
Section 536(2) was construed as making post-petition dispositions voidable rather than automatically void, so the court could validate a bona fide transaction if it benefited the company or creditors. The first transaction was validated because the applicant showed no knowledge of the winding-up petition despite due diligence, paid above market value, used the proceeds to discharge creditors, and no fraud, taint, or undervaluation was proved. Alleged statutory dues did not defeat validation on the material before the court. The second transaction, being a private inter se transfer, was held outside the scope of the application and was not adjudicated.

Topics

Acts Income Tax